Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources

Using state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam K. Edgerton, Laura M. Desimone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-10-01
Series:AERA Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863
id doaj-071b0be8d8c443eabb0a847c43e9d480
record_format Article
spelling doaj-071b0be8d8c443eabb0a847c43e9d4802020-11-25T03:17:51ZengSAGE PublishingAERA Open2332-85842018-10-01410.1177/2332858418806863Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and ResourcesAdam K. EdgertonLaura M. DesimoneUsing state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How does their policy environment predict standards-emphasized instruction? Do these relationships differ for those who teach different subjects (math and English Language Arts [ELA]), different grades (elementary or high school), different populations (English Language Learners [ELLs], students with disabilities [SWDs]), and in different areas (rural, urban, or suburban)? We found elementary math teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than elementary ELA teachers, whereas secondary ELA teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than secondary math teachers. Teachers of SWDs and rural teachers taught significantly less of the emphasized content. In all three states, we found greater buy-in (authority) predicted increased emphasized content coverage among ELA teachers but not among math teachers.https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adam K. Edgerton
Laura M. Desimone
spellingShingle Adam K. Edgerton
Laura M. Desimone
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
AERA Open
author_facet Adam K. Edgerton
Laura M. Desimone
author_sort Adam K. Edgerton
title Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
title_short Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
title_full Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
title_fullStr Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
title_full_unstemmed Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
title_sort teacher implementation of college- and career-readiness standards: links among policy, instruction, challenges, and resources
publisher SAGE Publishing
series AERA Open
issn 2332-8584
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Using state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How does their policy environment predict standards-emphasized instruction? Do these relationships differ for those who teach different subjects (math and English Language Arts [ELA]), different grades (elementary or high school), different populations (English Language Learners [ELLs], students with disabilities [SWDs]), and in different areas (rural, urban, or suburban)? We found elementary math teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than elementary ELA teachers, whereas secondary ELA teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than secondary math teachers. Teachers of SWDs and rural teachers taught significantly less of the emphasized content. In all three states, we found greater buy-in (authority) predicted increased emphasized content coverage among ELA teachers but not among math teachers.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863
work_keys_str_mv AT adamkedgerton teacherimplementationofcollegeandcareerreadinessstandardslinksamongpolicyinstructionchallengesandresources
AT lauramdesimone teacherimplementationofcollegeandcareerreadinessstandardslinksamongpolicyinstructionchallengesandresources
_version_ 1724629511998275584