Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources
Using state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How d...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-10-01
|
Series: | AERA Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863 |
id |
doaj-071b0be8d8c443eabb0a847c43e9d480 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-071b0be8d8c443eabb0a847c43e9d4802020-11-25T03:17:51ZengSAGE PublishingAERA Open2332-85842018-10-01410.1177/2332858418806863Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and ResourcesAdam K. EdgertonLaura M. DesimoneUsing state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How does their policy environment predict standards-emphasized instruction? Do these relationships differ for those who teach different subjects (math and English Language Arts [ELA]), different grades (elementary or high school), different populations (English Language Learners [ELLs], students with disabilities [SWDs]), and in different areas (rural, urban, or suburban)? We found elementary math teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than elementary ELA teachers, whereas secondary ELA teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than secondary math teachers. Teachers of SWDs and rural teachers taught significantly less of the emphasized content. In all three states, we found greater buy-in (authority) predicted increased emphasized content coverage among ELA teachers but not among math teachers.https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adam K. Edgerton Laura M. Desimone |
spellingShingle |
Adam K. Edgerton Laura M. Desimone Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources AERA Open |
author_facet |
Adam K. Edgerton Laura M. Desimone |
author_sort |
Adam K. Edgerton |
title |
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources |
title_short |
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources |
title_full |
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources |
title_fullStr |
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources |
title_sort |
teacher implementation of college- and career-readiness standards: links among policy, instruction, challenges, and resources |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
AERA Open |
issn |
2332-8584 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Using state-representative teacher surveys in three states—Texas, Ohio, and Kentucky—we examine teachers’ implementation of college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards. What do teachers report about the specificity, authority, consistency, power, and stability of their standards environment? How does their policy environment predict standards-emphasized instruction? Do these relationships differ for those who teach different subjects (math and English Language Arts [ELA]), different grades (elementary or high school), different populations (English Language Learners [ELLs], students with disabilities [SWDs]), and in different areas (rural, urban, or suburban)? We found elementary math teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than elementary ELA teachers, whereas secondary ELA teachers taught significantly more standards-emphasized content than secondary math teachers. Teachers of SWDs and rural teachers taught significantly less of the emphasized content. In all three states, we found greater buy-in (authority) predicted increased emphasized content coverage among ELA teachers but not among math teachers. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806863 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adamkedgerton teacherimplementationofcollegeandcareerreadinessstandardslinksamongpolicyinstructionchallengesandresources AT lauramdesimone teacherimplementationofcollegeandcareerreadinessstandardslinksamongpolicyinstructionchallengesandresources |
_version_ |
1724629511998275584 |