Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components

Additive manufacturing (AM) is being used increasingly for repair and remanufacturing of aeroengine components. This enables the consideration of a design margin approach to satisfy changing requirements, in which component lifespan can be optimized for different lifecycle scenarios. This paradigm r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lydia Lawand, Massimo Panarotto, Petter Andersson, Ola Isaksson, Michael Kokkolaras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/7/8/110
id doaj-0705b71ade14454e8991874372ad36e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0705b71ade14454e8991874372ad36e72020-11-25T03:46:02ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102020-07-01711011010.3390/aerospace7080110Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine ComponentsLydia Lawand0Massimo Panarotto1Petter Andersson2Ola Isaksson3Michael Kokkolaras4Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Göteborg, SwedenGKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Flygmotorvägen 1, 461 38 Trollhättan, SwedenDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Göteborg, SwedenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaAdditive manufacturing (AM) is being used increasingly for repair and remanufacturing of aeroengine components. This enables the consideration of a design margin approach to satisfy changing requirements, in which component lifespan can be optimized for different lifecycle scenarios. This paradigm requires lifecycle cost (LCC) modeling; however, the LCC models available in the literature consider mostly the manufacturing of a component, not its repair or remanufacturing. There is thus a need for an LCC model that can consider AM for repair/remanufacturing to quantify corresponding costs and benefits. This paper presents a dynamic LCC model that estimates cumulative costs over the in-service phase and a nested design optimization problem formulation that determines the optimal component lifespan range to minimize overall cost while maximizing performance. The developed methodology is demonstrated by means of an aeroengine turbine rear structure.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/7/8/110design optimizationlifecycle costadditive remanufacturingflexible component designdynamic design margins
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lydia Lawand
Massimo Panarotto
Petter Andersson
Ola Isaksson
Michael Kokkolaras
spellingShingle Lydia Lawand
Massimo Panarotto
Petter Andersson
Ola Isaksson
Michael Kokkolaras
Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
Aerospace
design optimization
lifecycle cost
additive remanufacturing
flexible component design
dynamic design margins
author_facet Lydia Lawand
Massimo Panarotto
Petter Andersson
Ola Isaksson
Michael Kokkolaras
author_sort Lydia Lawand
title Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
title_short Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
title_full Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
title_fullStr Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Lifecycle Cost Modeling for Adaptable Design Optimization of Additively Remanufactured Aeroengine Components
title_sort dynamic lifecycle cost modeling for adaptable design optimization of additively remanufactured aeroengine components
publisher MDPI AG
series Aerospace
issn 2226-4310
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Additive manufacturing (AM) is being used increasingly for repair and remanufacturing of aeroengine components. This enables the consideration of a design margin approach to satisfy changing requirements, in which component lifespan can be optimized for different lifecycle scenarios. This paradigm requires lifecycle cost (LCC) modeling; however, the LCC models available in the literature consider mostly the manufacturing of a component, not its repair or remanufacturing. There is thus a need for an LCC model that can consider AM for repair/remanufacturing to quantify corresponding costs and benefits. This paper presents a dynamic LCC model that estimates cumulative costs over the in-service phase and a nested design optimization problem formulation that determines the optimal component lifespan range to minimize overall cost while maximizing performance. The developed methodology is demonstrated by means of an aeroengine turbine rear structure.
topic design optimization
lifecycle cost
additive remanufacturing
flexible component design
dynamic design margins
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/7/8/110
work_keys_str_mv AT lydialawand dynamiclifecyclecostmodelingforadaptabledesignoptimizationofadditivelyremanufacturedaeroenginecomponents
AT massimopanarotto dynamiclifecyclecostmodelingforadaptabledesignoptimizationofadditivelyremanufacturedaeroenginecomponents
AT petterandersson dynamiclifecyclecostmodelingforadaptabledesignoptimizationofadditivelyremanufacturedaeroenginecomponents
AT olaisaksson dynamiclifecyclecostmodelingforadaptabledesignoptimizationofadditivelyremanufacturedaeroenginecomponents
AT michaelkokkolaras dynamiclifecyclecostmodelingforadaptabledesignoptimizationofadditivelyremanufacturedaeroenginecomponents
_version_ 1724508354465759232