Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: A challenge for physicians is determining when an injured athlete is ready to return to competition. While a wide variety of ankle strength and fitness tests have been described, there are no norms or minimum performance thresholds for any of them. In this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Greisberg MD, J. Turner Vosseller MD, Peter Gould BA, Christopher Ahmad MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-09-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00229
id doaj-0703f5d44e424c76b3488e5e933ed962
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0703f5d44e424c76b3488e5e933ed9622020-11-25T02:48:37ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142018-09-01310.1177/2473011418S00229Performance Function Tests in Healthy AthletesJustin Greisberg MDJ. Turner Vosseller MDPeter Gould BAChristopher Ahmad MDCategory: Sports Introduction/Purpose: A challenge for physicians is determining when an injured athlete is ready to return to competition. While a wide variety of ankle strength and fitness tests have been described, there are no norms or minimum performance thresholds for any of them. In this study, healthy athletes were given a series of functional tests to complete. We propose that there will be a minimum performance level for each of the tests that all athletes can complete. We also propose, for tests which assess the right and left legs independently, that performance of the right leg will consistently be within 10% of the left. Finally, we propose that performance on one of the functional tests will be predictive of function on all of the tests. Methods: Healthy college athletes were put through a testing protocol, beginning with simple range of motion assessment and progressing through a series of functional ankle tests of increasing difficulty. The athlete began with the dorsiflexion lunge test, and then progressed to single leg heel raising, single leg hopping, side hopping, front-back hopping, functional hop test, and finally 180 degree rotational jump. Right and left legs were recorded separately for the first five tests. For each test, means, ranges, and standard deviations were calculated. Results: Eighty-one athletes (male and female from different sports) completed the protocol; no athlete was unable to finish the testing sequence. There was a wide variation in performance ability between athletes; the standard deviation for any of the individual tests was too high to determine a minimum threshold of normal performance. However, when comparing right to left leg in any one athlete, the difference in performance testing was always less than 10%. Furthermore, performance on any of the hopping tests was predictive of performance on all of them. Conclusion: Ideally, an athlete could be deemed ready to return to sports activity if he or she performed above a certain threshold on a performance test. Unfortunately, athletes had such a wide range of performance that it is not possible to define a minimum threshold for any of these tests. However, right and left leg performance was always within 10% of each other. For an athlete with a single leg injury, we propose that performance on a functional hopping test less than 10% different from the uninjured leg should be the standard.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00229
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Greisberg MD
J. Turner Vosseller MD
Peter Gould BA
Christopher Ahmad MD
spellingShingle Justin Greisberg MD
J. Turner Vosseller MD
Peter Gould BA
Christopher Ahmad MD
Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet Justin Greisberg MD
J. Turner Vosseller MD
Peter Gould BA
Christopher Ahmad MD
author_sort Justin Greisberg MD
title Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
title_short Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
title_full Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
title_fullStr Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Performance Function Tests in Healthy Athletes
title_sort performance function tests in healthy athletes
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: A challenge for physicians is determining when an injured athlete is ready to return to competition. While a wide variety of ankle strength and fitness tests have been described, there are no norms or minimum performance thresholds for any of them. In this study, healthy athletes were given a series of functional tests to complete. We propose that there will be a minimum performance level for each of the tests that all athletes can complete. We also propose, for tests which assess the right and left legs independently, that performance of the right leg will consistently be within 10% of the left. Finally, we propose that performance on one of the functional tests will be predictive of function on all of the tests. Methods: Healthy college athletes were put through a testing protocol, beginning with simple range of motion assessment and progressing through a series of functional ankle tests of increasing difficulty. The athlete began with the dorsiflexion lunge test, and then progressed to single leg heel raising, single leg hopping, side hopping, front-back hopping, functional hop test, and finally 180 degree rotational jump. Right and left legs were recorded separately for the first five tests. For each test, means, ranges, and standard deviations were calculated. Results: Eighty-one athletes (male and female from different sports) completed the protocol; no athlete was unable to finish the testing sequence. There was a wide variation in performance ability between athletes; the standard deviation for any of the individual tests was too high to determine a minimum threshold of normal performance. However, when comparing right to left leg in any one athlete, the difference in performance testing was always less than 10%. Furthermore, performance on any of the hopping tests was predictive of performance on all of them. Conclusion: Ideally, an athlete could be deemed ready to return to sports activity if he or she performed above a certain threshold on a performance test. Unfortunately, athletes had such a wide range of performance that it is not possible to define a minimum threshold for any of these tests. However, right and left leg performance was always within 10% of each other. For an athlete with a single leg injury, we propose that performance on a functional hopping test less than 10% different from the uninjured leg should be the standard.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00229
work_keys_str_mv AT justingreisbergmd performancefunctiontestsinhealthyathletes
AT jturnervossellermd performancefunctiontestsinhealthyathletes
AT petergouldba performancefunctiontestsinhealthyathletes
AT christopherahmadmd performancefunctiontestsinhealthyathletes
_version_ 1724747492093853696