Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?

According to earlier studies, Finnish physicians suffer from stress caused by poor usability of their digital tools and feel excluded from healthcare IT development. Active participation in usability evaluation could help involve doctors into developmental work, but more effective and participatory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nico Vehmas, Johanna Kaipio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association 2018-05-01
Series:Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/69162
id doaj-06ffd644e6c24698a3964b10e56f0aca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06ffd644e6c24698a3964b10e56f0aca2021-04-21T08:11:41ZengFinnish Social and Health Informatics AssociationFinnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare1798-07982018-05-01102-310.23996/fjhw.69162Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?Nico Vehmas0Johanna KaipioUniversity of Helsinki According to earlier studies, Finnish physicians suffer from stress caused by poor usability of their digital tools and feel excluded from healthcare IT development. Active participation in usability evaluation could help involve doctors into developmental work, but more effective and participatory methods are needed. The objective of this study was to research whether physicians with no training in usability evaluation are able to discover usability problems using heuristic walkthrough technique. In addition, we wanted to find out if the level of EHR user experience affects the nature of the usability problems found. Heuristic walkthrough using a modified set of Nielsen’s heuristics and clinical tasks was performed to evaluate usability of a widely used Electronic Health Record (EHR) in Finland. Medical students and physicians with no previous experience in usability evaluation and 1) with or 2) without prior experience in using the EHR in question were recruited as evaluators. A control group of usability experts was used. Physicians were able to identify usability problems, ranging from cosmetic flaws to problems concerning patient safety and significant hindrance for work. Analysis of the found usability problems revealed that experienced EHR users discovered usability problems in nearly all major functions within the given scenario and time span. Physicians as evaluators in heuristic walkthrough has the potential to produce relevant data about EHR usability. The arrangement benefits participating physicians by introducing them to usability. Further research needs to find out, whether the suggested method could support better communication and collaboration between end-users and software developers. https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/69162Electronic Health RecordPhysicianUsabilityHeuristic walkthroughUsability evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nico Vehmas
Johanna Kaipio
spellingShingle Nico Vehmas
Johanna Kaipio
Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
Electronic Health Record
Physician
Usability
Heuristic walkthrough
Usability evaluation
author_facet Nico Vehmas
Johanna Kaipio
author_sort Nico Vehmas
title Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
title_short Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
title_full Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
title_fullStr Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
title_full_unstemmed Physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor EHR usability?
title_sort physicians as usability evaluators – first aid for poor ehr usability?
publisher Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association
series Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
issn 1798-0798
publishDate 2018-05-01
description According to earlier studies, Finnish physicians suffer from stress caused by poor usability of their digital tools and feel excluded from healthcare IT development. Active participation in usability evaluation could help involve doctors into developmental work, but more effective and participatory methods are needed. The objective of this study was to research whether physicians with no training in usability evaluation are able to discover usability problems using heuristic walkthrough technique. In addition, we wanted to find out if the level of EHR user experience affects the nature of the usability problems found. Heuristic walkthrough using a modified set of Nielsen’s heuristics and clinical tasks was performed to evaluate usability of a widely used Electronic Health Record (EHR) in Finland. Medical students and physicians with no previous experience in usability evaluation and 1) with or 2) without prior experience in using the EHR in question were recruited as evaluators. A control group of usability experts was used. Physicians were able to identify usability problems, ranging from cosmetic flaws to problems concerning patient safety and significant hindrance for work. Analysis of the found usability problems revealed that experienced EHR users discovered usability problems in nearly all major functions within the given scenario and time span. Physicians as evaluators in heuristic walkthrough has the potential to produce relevant data about EHR usability. The arrangement benefits participating physicians by introducing them to usability. Further research needs to find out, whether the suggested method could support better communication and collaboration between end-users and software developers.
topic Electronic Health Record
Physician
Usability
Heuristic walkthrough
Usability evaluation
url https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/69162
work_keys_str_mv AT nicovehmas physiciansasusabilityevaluatorsfirstaidforpoorehrusability
AT johannakaipio physiciansasusabilityevaluatorsfirstaidforpoorehrusability
_version_ 1721516623988260864