Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns

Why do parties and candidates decide to go negative? Research usually starts from the assumption that this decision is strategic, and within this framework two elements stand out: the prospect of electoral failure increases the use of negative campaigning, and so does time pressure (little reaming t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Nai, Ferran Martínez i Coma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-06-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1940
id doaj-06e22a4e35e845dba863a544175cef6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06e22a4e35e845dba863a544175cef6f2020-11-25T01:55:15ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-06-017227829610.17645/pag.v7i2.19401072Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum CampaignsAlessandro Nai0Ferran Martínez i Coma1Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGriffith Business School, Griffith University, AustraliaWhy do parties and candidates decide to go negative? Research usually starts from the assumption that this decision is strategic, and within this framework two elements stand out: the prospect of electoral failure increases the use of negative campaigning, and so does time pressure (little reaming time to convince voters before election day). In this article, we contribute to this framework by testing two new expectations: (i) political actors are more likely to go negative when they face unfavourable competitive standings and voting day is near; and (ii) they are less likely to go negative when they faced a substantive degradation in their competitive standing over the course of the campaign. We test these expectations on a rich database of newspaper ads about national referenda in Switzerland and provide preliminary empirical evidence consistent with those expectations. The results have important implications for existing research on the strategic underpinnings of campaigning and political communication.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1940anxietyadvertisement timingcompetitive standingdirect democracypollsstrategic behaviourSwitzerlandnegative campaigning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandro Nai
Ferran Martínez i Coma
spellingShingle Alessandro Nai
Ferran Martínez i Coma
Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
Politics and Governance
anxiety
advertisement timing
competitive standing
direct democracy
polls
strategic behaviour
Switzerland
negative campaigning
author_facet Alessandro Nai
Ferran Martínez i Coma
author_sort Alessandro Nai
title Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
title_short Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
title_full Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
title_fullStr Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
title_full_unstemmed Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns
title_sort losing in the polls, time pressure, and the decision to go negative in referendum campaigns
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Why do parties and candidates decide to go negative? Research usually starts from the assumption that this decision is strategic, and within this framework two elements stand out: the prospect of electoral failure increases the use of negative campaigning, and so does time pressure (little reaming time to convince voters before election day). In this article, we contribute to this framework by testing two new expectations: (i) political actors are more likely to go negative when they face unfavourable competitive standings and voting day is near; and (ii) they are less likely to go negative when they faced a substantive degradation in their competitive standing over the course of the campaign. We test these expectations on a rich database of newspaper ads about national referenda in Switzerland and provide preliminary empirical evidence consistent with those expectations. The results have important implications for existing research on the strategic underpinnings of campaigning and political communication.
topic anxiety
advertisement timing
competitive standing
direct democracy
polls
strategic behaviour
Switzerland
negative campaigning
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1940
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandronai losinginthepollstimepressureandthedecisiontogonegativeinreferendumcampaigns
AT ferranmartinezicoma losinginthepollstimepressureandthedecisiontogonegativeinreferendumcampaigns
_version_ 1724984231822622720