Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality

<p class="AbstractTxt">Over the last three decades, welfare states across the West have embraced a host of new technologies and initiatives in the name of fighting welfare abuse and fraud (see Cook 1989, 2006; Wacquant 2001, 2009). Increasingly, these practices of ‘welfare policing’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scarlet Wilcock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Queensland University of Technology 2016-03-01
Series:International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/296
id doaj-06d1ba6bd323451bad830497c9183753
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06d1ba6bd323451bad830497c91837532021-06-02T01:10:08ZengQueensland University of TechnologyInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy2202-79982202-80052016-03-015111313010.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.296212Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and CriminalityScarlet Wilcock0University of New South Wales<p class="AbstractTxt">Over the last three decades, welfare states across the West have embraced a host of new technologies and initiatives in the name of fighting welfare abuse and fraud (see Cook 1989, 2006; Wacquant 2001, 2009). Increasingly, these practices of ‘welfare policing’ are graduated according to risk; particular welfare populations considered at greater risk of welfare fraud are subject to more intense scrutiny. Drawing on interview research with compliance staff from the Australian Department of Human Services, this paper critically explores how the rationality of risk figures in the process of welfare surveillance in Australia. It pays particular attention to the ways in which risk formulations are embedded in gender and class politics, and how this has led to the characterisation of single mothers and unemployed recipients as more ‘risky’ than the general welfare population, a point that is often overlooked in the literature. But, far from being immutable, this paper also considers how the politics of risk are open to reformulation with often unexpected results.</p>https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/296Welfare statewelfare surveillanceriskgendercriminalisation.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scarlet Wilcock
spellingShingle Scarlet Wilcock
Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Welfare state
welfare surveillance
risk
gender
criminalisation.
author_facet Scarlet Wilcock
author_sort Scarlet Wilcock
title Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
title_short Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
title_full Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
title_fullStr Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
title_full_unstemmed Policing Welfare: Risk, Gender and Criminality
title_sort policing welfare: risk, gender and criminality
publisher Queensland University of Technology
series International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
issn 2202-7998
2202-8005
publishDate 2016-03-01
description <p class="AbstractTxt">Over the last three decades, welfare states across the West have embraced a host of new technologies and initiatives in the name of fighting welfare abuse and fraud (see Cook 1989, 2006; Wacquant 2001, 2009). Increasingly, these practices of ‘welfare policing’ are graduated according to risk; particular welfare populations considered at greater risk of welfare fraud are subject to more intense scrutiny. Drawing on interview research with compliance staff from the Australian Department of Human Services, this paper critically explores how the rationality of risk figures in the process of welfare surveillance in Australia. It pays particular attention to the ways in which risk formulations are embedded in gender and class politics, and how this has led to the characterisation of single mothers and unemployed recipients as more ‘risky’ than the general welfare population, a point that is often overlooked in the literature. But, far from being immutable, this paper also considers how the politics of risk are open to reformulation with often unexpected results.</p>
topic Welfare state
welfare surveillance
risk
gender
criminalisation.
url https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/296
work_keys_str_mv AT scarletwilcock policingwelfareriskgenderandcriminality
_version_ 1721409709684031488