A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles

A comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Egill Thorbergsson, Tomas Grönstedt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Energy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431
id doaj-06c5805cf2cf4738abed2bce584c6504
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06c5805cf2cf4738abed2bce584c65042020-11-25T01:40:08ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Energy2356-735X2314-615X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/24384312438431A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined CyclesEgill Thorbergsson0Tomas Grönstedt1Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, SwedenDivision of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, SwedenA comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A parametric study was conducted where the pressure ratio and the turbine entry temperature were varied. The layout and the design of the SCOC-CC are considerably simpler than the Graz cycle while it achieves the same net efficiency as the Graz cycle. The fact that the efficiencies for the two cycles are close to identical differs from previously reported work. Earlier studies have reported around a 3% points advantage in efficiency for the Graz cycle, which is attributed to the use of a second bottoming cycle. This additional feature is omitted to make the two cycles more comparable in terms of complexity. The Graz cycle has substantially lower pressure ratio at the optimum efficiency and has much higher power density for the gas turbine than both the reference cycle and the SCOC-CC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Egill Thorbergsson
Tomas Grönstedt
spellingShingle Egill Thorbergsson
Tomas Grönstedt
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
Journal of Energy
author_facet Egill Thorbergsson
Tomas Grönstedt
author_sort Egill Thorbergsson
title A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
title_short A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
title_full A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
title_fullStr A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
title_full_unstemmed A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
title_sort thermodynamic analysis of two competing mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Energy
issn 2356-735X
2314-615X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description A comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A parametric study was conducted where the pressure ratio and the turbine entry temperature were varied. The layout and the design of the SCOC-CC are considerably simpler than the Graz cycle while it achieves the same net efficiency as the Graz cycle. The fact that the efficiencies for the two cycles are close to identical differs from previously reported work. Earlier studies have reported around a 3% points advantage in efficiency for the Graz cycle, which is attributed to the use of a second bottoming cycle. This additional feature is omitted to make the two cycles more comparable in terms of complexity. The Graz cycle has substantially lower pressure ratio at the optimum efficiency and has much higher power density for the gas turbine than both the reference cycle and the SCOC-CC.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431
work_keys_str_mv AT egillthorbergsson athermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles
AT tomasgronstedt athermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles
AT egillthorbergsson thermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles
AT tomasgronstedt thermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles
_version_ 1725046930957926400