A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
A comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Energy |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431 |
id |
doaj-06c5805cf2cf4738abed2bce584c6504 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-06c5805cf2cf4738abed2bce584c65042020-11-25T01:40:08ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Energy2356-735X2314-615X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/24384312438431A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined CyclesEgill Thorbergsson0Tomas Grönstedt1Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, SwedenDivision of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, SwedenA comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A parametric study was conducted where the pressure ratio and the turbine entry temperature were varied. The layout and the design of the SCOC-CC are considerably simpler than the Graz cycle while it achieves the same net efficiency as the Graz cycle. The fact that the efficiencies for the two cycles are close to identical differs from previously reported work. Earlier studies have reported around a 3% points advantage in efficiency for the Graz cycle, which is attributed to the use of a second bottoming cycle. This additional feature is omitted to make the two cycles more comparable in terms of complexity. The Graz cycle has substantially lower pressure ratio at the optimum efficiency and has much higher power density for the gas turbine than both the reference cycle and the SCOC-CC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Egill Thorbergsson Tomas Grönstedt |
spellingShingle |
Egill Thorbergsson Tomas Grönstedt A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles Journal of Energy |
author_facet |
Egill Thorbergsson Tomas Grönstedt |
author_sort |
Egill Thorbergsson |
title |
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles |
title_short |
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles |
title_full |
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles |
title_fullStr |
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles |
title_sort |
thermodynamic analysis of two competing mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Energy |
issn |
2356-735X 2314-615X |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
A comparative analysis of two mid-sized oxyfuel combustion combined cycles is performed. The two cycles are the semiclosed oxyfuel combustion combined cycle (SCOC-CC) and the Graz cycle. In addition, a reference cycle was established as the basis for the analysis of the oxyfuel combustion cycles. A parametric study was conducted where the pressure ratio and the turbine entry temperature were varied. The layout and the design of the SCOC-CC are considerably simpler than the Graz cycle while it achieves the same net efficiency as the Graz cycle. The fact that the efficiencies for the two cycles are close to identical differs from previously reported work. Earlier studies have reported around a 3% points advantage in efficiency for the Graz cycle, which is attributed to the use of a second bottoming cycle. This additional feature is omitted to make the two cycles more comparable in terms of complexity. The Graz cycle has substantially lower pressure ratio at the optimum efficiency and has much higher power density for the gas turbine than both the reference cycle and the SCOC-CC. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2438431 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT egillthorbergsson athermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles AT tomasgronstedt athermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles AT egillthorbergsson thermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles AT tomasgronstedt thermodynamicanalysisoftwocompetingmidsizedoxyfuelcombustioncombinedcycles |
_version_ |
1725046930957926400 |