Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review

Home-based reablement (HBR) aims to restore or increase patients’ level of functioning, thereby increasing the patients’ self-reliance and consequently decreasing their dependence on healthcare services. To date, the evidence on whether HBR is an efficient method has not been comprehensively review...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tore Bersvendsen, Jochen Jungeilges, Eirik Abildsnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Oslo 2021-05-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Health Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uio.no/NJHE/article/view/7838
id doaj-06ba7e4b53a345cea4c4e782fbc674e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06ba7e4b53a345cea4c4e782fbc674e02021-05-29T12:58:24ZengUniversity of OsloNordic Journal of Health Economics1892-97291892-97102021-05-0110.5617/njhe.7838Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A reviewTore Bersvendsen0Jochen Jungeilges1Eirik Abildsnes2Kristiansand Municipality, University of Agder University of Agder, Ural Federal UniversityKristiansand Municipality, University of Agder Home-based reablement (HBR) aims to restore or increase patients’ level of functioning, thereby increasing the patients’ self-reliance and consequently decreasing their dependence on healthcare services. To date, the evidence on whether HBR is an efficient method has not been comprehensively reviewed. The aim of this study was to provide a concise summary of relevant existing findings. In addition, we provide a critical constructive assessment of the publications reflecting the extant research.  The relevant literature on this topic was identified through a systematic search of appropriate databases. Thereafter, we screened the studies, first by title, followed by abstract and then by assessing full-text eligibility. A checklist of 15 criteria was developed and used as the basis for the quality assessment. In total, 12 studies from Australia, New Zealand, the USA and Norway were included in the full-text review. The studies reported estimated cost differences between HBR and usual care after the intervention. All the studies indicated lower costs for HBR, but not all of them reported a significant difference. The same pattern was also found for other measures of physical functioning and quality of life. The assessment revealed one specific common pattern: None of the papers scrutinized provided sufficient information about the data or the statistics employed, and all lacked external validity. Some promising results have been reported with respect to HBR reducing the need for specialist or residential care. In short, the existing evidence regarding the effects of HBR is still inconclusive. The findings from the quality assessment should motivate a multidisciplinary approach for future research on HBR. Published: Online May 2021.  https://journals.uio.no/NJHE/article/view/7838Reablement, economic/econometric evaluation, rehabilitation, RCT technology, assessment tool
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tore Bersvendsen
Jochen Jungeilges
Eirik Abildsnes
spellingShingle Tore Bersvendsen
Jochen Jungeilges
Eirik Abildsnes
Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
Nordic Journal of Health Economics
Reablement, economic/econometric evaluation, rehabilitation, RCT technology, assessment tool
author_facet Tore Bersvendsen
Jochen Jungeilges
Eirik Abildsnes
author_sort Tore Bersvendsen
title Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
title_short Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
title_full Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
title_fullStr Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
title_full_unstemmed Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: A review
title_sort empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: a review
publisher University of Oslo
series Nordic Journal of Health Economics
issn 1892-9729
1892-9710
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Home-based reablement (HBR) aims to restore or increase patients’ level of functioning, thereby increasing the patients’ self-reliance and consequently decreasing their dependence on healthcare services. To date, the evidence on whether HBR is an efficient method has not been comprehensively reviewed. The aim of this study was to provide a concise summary of relevant existing findings. In addition, we provide a critical constructive assessment of the publications reflecting the extant research.  The relevant literature on this topic was identified through a systematic search of appropriate databases. Thereafter, we screened the studies, first by title, followed by abstract and then by assessing full-text eligibility. A checklist of 15 criteria was developed and used as the basis for the quality assessment. In total, 12 studies from Australia, New Zealand, the USA and Norway were included in the full-text review. The studies reported estimated cost differences between HBR and usual care after the intervention. All the studies indicated lower costs for HBR, but not all of them reported a significant difference. The same pattern was also found for other measures of physical functioning and quality of life. The assessment revealed one specific common pattern: None of the papers scrutinized provided sufficient information about the data or the statistics employed, and all lacked external validity. Some promising results have been reported with respect to HBR reducing the need for specialist or residential care. In short, the existing evidence regarding the effects of HBR is still inconclusive. The findings from the quality assessment should motivate a multidisciplinary approach for future research on HBR. Published: Online May 2021. 
topic Reablement, economic/econometric evaluation, rehabilitation, RCT technology, assessment tool
url https://journals.uio.no/NJHE/article/view/7838
work_keys_str_mv AT torebersvendsen empiricalevaluationofhomebasedreablementareview
AT jochenjungeilges empiricalevaluationofhomebasedreablementareview
AT eirikabildsnes empiricalevaluationofhomebasedreablementareview
_version_ 1721422085254807552