Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program

In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Ene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maxensius Tri Sambodo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Indonesia 2015-07-01
Series:Economics and Finance in Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505
id doaj-06b4e183a2384831884e0ca993665d73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06b4e183a2384831884e0ca993665d732020-11-24T20:59:45ZengUniversitas IndonesiaEconomics and Finance in Indonesia0126-155X2442-92602015-07-0161210711910.7454/efi.v61i2.505Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS ProgramMaxensius Tri Sambodo0Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Energy Saving (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi, SEHEN) that is belong to PLN (state owned company in electricity) and the Solar Home System (SHS) that is financed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). Indonesia has started the rural electrification program in the late 1950s, but how to provide electricity in a sustainable ways both organizationally and institutionally still become a big challenge. The experiences from East Nusa Tenggara provinces showed that both SEHEN and SHS can instantly improve electrification ratio, but government needs to synchronize the technical, administrative, and financial aspect from the two programs. Without any improvements in designing the program, we argue that the existing program is not sustainable.http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505Electrification RatioRural ElectrificationSustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maxensius Tri Sambodo
spellingShingle Maxensius Tri Sambodo
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
Economics and Finance in Indonesia
Electrification Ratio
Rural Electrification
Sustainability
author_facet Maxensius Tri Sambodo
author_sort Maxensius Tri Sambodo
title Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
title_short Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
title_full Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
title_fullStr Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
title_full_unstemmed Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
title_sort rural electrification program in indonesia: comparing sehen and shs program
publisher Universitas Indonesia
series Economics and Finance in Indonesia
issn 0126-155X
2442-9260
publishDate 2015-07-01
description In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Energy Saving (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi, SEHEN) that is belong to PLN (state owned company in electricity) and the Solar Home System (SHS) that is financed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). Indonesia has started the rural electrification program in the late 1950s, but how to provide electricity in a sustainable ways both organizationally and institutionally still become a big challenge. The experiences from East Nusa Tenggara provinces showed that both SEHEN and SHS can instantly improve electrification ratio, but government needs to synchronize the technical, administrative, and financial aspect from the two programs. Without any improvements in designing the program, we argue that the existing program is not sustainable.
topic Electrification Ratio
Rural Electrification
Sustainability
url http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505
work_keys_str_mv AT maxensiustrisambodo ruralelectrificationprograminindonesiacomparingsehenandshsprogram
_version_ 1716781677621018624