Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program
In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Ene...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Indonesia
2015-07-01
|
Series: | Economics and Finance in Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505 |
id |
doaj-06b4e183a2384831884e0ca993665d73 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-06b4e183a2384831884e0ca993665d732020-11-24T20:59:45ZengUniversitas IndonesiaEconomics and Finance in Indonesia0126-155X2442-92602015-07-0161210711910.7454/efi.v61i2.505Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS ProgramMaxensius Tri Sambodo0Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Energy Saving (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi, SEHEN) that is belong to PLN (state owned company in electricity) and the Solar Home System (SHS) that is financed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). Indonesia has started the rural electrification program in the late 1950s, but how to provide electricity in a sustainable ways both organizationally and institutionally still become a big challenge. The experiences from East Nusa Tenggara provinces showed that both SEHEN and SHS can instantly improve electrification ratio, but government needs to synchronize the technical, administrative, and financial aspect from the two programs. Without any improvements in designing the program, we argue that the existing program is not sustainable.http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505Electrification RatioRural ElectrificationSustainability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maxensius Tri Sambodo |
spellingShingle |
Maxensius Tri Sambodo Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program Economics and Finance in Indonesia Electrification Ratio Rural Electrification Sustainability |
author_facet |
Maxensius Tri Sambodo |
author_sort |
Maxensius Tri Sambodo |
title |
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program |
title_short |
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program |
title_full |
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program |
title_fullStr |
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program |
title_sort |
rural electrification program in indonesia: comparing sehen and shs program |
publisher |
Universitas Indonesia |
series |
Economics and Finance in Indonesia |
issn |
0126-155X 2442-9260 |
publishDate |
2015-07-01 |
description |
In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Energy Saving (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi, SEHEN) that is belong to PLN (state owned company in electricity) and the Solar Home System (SHS) that is financed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). Indonesia has started the rural electrification program in the late 1950s, but how to provide electricity in a sustainable ways both organizationally and institutionally still become a big challenge. The experiences from East Nusa Tenggara provinces showed that both SEHEN and SHS can instantly improve electrification ratio, but government needs to synchronize the technical, administrative, and financial aspect from the two programs. Without any improvements in designing the program, we argue that the existing program is not sustainable. |
topic |
Electrification Ratio Rural Electrification Sustainability |
url |
http://efi.ui.ac.id/index.php/efi/article/view/505 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maxensiustrisambodo ruralelectrificationprograminindonesiacomparingsehenandshsprogram |
_version_ |
1716781677621018624 |