Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear mate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frederic Martens, Geoffrey Lesage, Jeffrey M. Muir, Jonathan R. Stieber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4
id doaj-06b10e0839874604a45115dae42052e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06b10e0839874604a45115dae42052e22020-11-25T01:08:08ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742018-07-011911710.1186/s12891-018-2178-4Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective studyFrederic Martens0Geoffrey Lesage1Jeffrey M. Muir2Jonathan R. Stieber3Department of Neurosurgery, OLV ZiekenhuisDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLV ZiekenhuisMotion ResearchClinical Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of MedicineAbstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear material, thus leaving the patient susceptible to reherniation requiring reoperation. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and viability of an annular closure device in limiting reherniation and reoperation in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy with the assistance of an annular closure device. Methods We retrospectively analysed the results from patients treated by a single surgeon between March 2011 and December 2017. All patients had been diagnosed with a large (≥ 5 mm) defect and were treated via minimally invasive surgical techniques. Outcomes included demographic data, the procedural duration and the rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation. Results 60 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42 years (range: 19–66); mean BMI was 24.1 (range: 16.7–36.3). Mean surgical duration was 29 min (range: 16–50). Reoperation was required in 5% (3/60) of patients, although only 3% (2/60) experienced symptomatic reherniation at the index level. No other complications were reported. Conclusions In our study, the use of an annular closure device during minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in a population of patients with large herniations was associated with low rates of reherniation and reoperation at the index level. While more research is required, the results of this study demonstrate the safety and viability of the annular closure device as an adjunct to minimally invasive discectomy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4Annular closure deviceLimited discectomyLumbar disc herniationMicroscopic discectomyMinimally invasiveTubular retractor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frederic Martens
Geoffrey Lesage
Jeffrey M. Muir
Jonathan R. Stieber
spellingShingle Frederic Martens
Geoffrey Lesage
Jeffrey M. Muir
Jonathan R. Stieber
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Annular closure device
Limited discectomy
Lumbar disc herniation
Microscopic discectomy
Minimally invasive
Tubular retractor
author_facet Frederic Martens
Geoffrey Lesage
Jeffrey M. Muir
Jonathan R. Stieber
author_sort Frederic Martens
title Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
title_short Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
title_full Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
title_sort implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear material, thus leaving the patient susceptible to reherniation requiring reoperation. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and viability of an annular closure device in limiting reherniation and reoperation in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy with the assistance of an annular closure device. Methods We retrospectively analysed the results from patients treated by a single surgeon between March 2011 and December 2017. All patients had been diagnosed with a large (≥ 5 mm) defect and were treated via minimally invasive surgical techniques. Outcomes included demographic data, the procedural duration and the rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation. Results 60 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42 years (range: 19–66); mean BMI was 24.1 (range: 16.7–36.3). Mean surgical duration was 29 min (range: 16–50). Reoperation was required in 5% (3/60) of patients, although only 3% (2/60) experienced symptomatic reherniation at the index level. No other complications were reported. Conclusions In our study, the use of an annular closure device during minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in a population of patients with large herniations was associated with low rates of reherniation and reoperation at the index level. While more research is required, the results of this study demonstrate the safety and viability of the annular closure device as an adjunct to minimally invasive discectomy.
topic Annular closure device
Limited discectomy
Lumbar disc herniation
Microscopic discectomy
Minimally invasive
Tubular retractor
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fredericmartens implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy
AT geoffreylesage implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy
AT jeffreymmuir implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy
AT jonathanrstieber implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725184092755984384