Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study
Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear mate...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4 |
id |
doaj-06b10e0839874604a45115dae42052e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-06b10e0839874604a45115dae42052e22020-11-25T01:08:08ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742018-07-011911710.1186/s12891-018-2178-4Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective studyFrederic Martens0Geoffrey Lesage1Jeffrey M. Muir2Jonathan R. Stieber3Department of Neurosurgery, OLV ZiekenhuisDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLV ZiekenhuisMotion ResearchClinical Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of MedicineAbstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear material, thus leaving the patient susceptible to reherniation requiring reoperation. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and viability of an annular closure device in limiting reherniation and reoperation in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy with the assistance of an annular closure device. Methods We retrospectively analysed the results from patients treated by a single surgeon between March 2011 and December 2017. All patients had been diagnosed with a large (≥ 5 mm) defect and were treated via minimally invasive surgical techniques. Outcomes included demographic data, the procedural duration and the rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation. Results 60 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42 years (range: 19–66); mean BMI was 24.1 (range: 16.7–36.3). Mean surgical duration was 29 min (range: 16–50). Reoperation was required in 5% (3/60) of patients, although only 3% (2/60) experienced symptomatic reherniation at the index level. No other complications were reported. Conclusions In our study, the use of an annular closure device during minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in a population of patients with large herniations was associated with low rates of reherniation and reoperation at the index level. While more research is required, the results of this study demonstrate the safety and viability of the annular closure device as an adjunct to minimally invasive discectomy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4Annular closure deviceLimited discectomyLumbar disc herniationMicroscopic discectomyMinimally invasiveTubular retractor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Frederic Martens Geoffrey Lesage Jeffrey M. Muir Jonathan R. Stieber |
spellingShingle |
Frederic Martens Geoffrey Lesage Jeffrey M. Muir Jonathan R. Stieber Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Annular closure device Limited discectomy Lumbar disc herniation Microscopic discectomy Minimally invasive Tubular retractor |
author_facet |
Frederic Martens Geoffrey Lesage Jeffrey M. Muir Jonathan R. Stieber |
author_sort |
Frederic Martens |
title |
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
title_short |
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
title_full |
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr |
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
title_sort |
implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear material, thus leaving the patient susceptible to reherniation requiring reoperation. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and viability of an annular closure device in limiting reherniation and reoperation in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy with the assistance of an annular closure device. Methods We retrospectively analysed the results from patients treated by a single surgeon between March 2011 and December 2017. All patients had been diagnosed with a large (≥ 5 mm) defect and were treated via minimally invasive surgical techniques. Outcomes included demographic data, the procedural duration and the rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation. Results 60 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42 years (range: 19–66); mean BMI was 24.1 (range: 16.7–36.3). Mean surgical duration was 29 min (range: 16–50). Reoperation was required in 5% (3/60) of patients, although only 3% (2/60) experienced symptomatic reherniation at the index level. No other complications were reported. Conclusions In our study, the use of an annular closure device during minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in a population of patients with large herniations was associated with low rates of reherniation and reoperation at the index level. While more research is required, the results of this study demonstrate the safety and viability of the annular closure device as an adjunct to minimally invasive discectomy. |
topic |
Annular closure device Limited discectomy Lumbar disc herniation Microscopic discectomy Minimally invasive Tubular retractor |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2178-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fredericmartens implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy AT geoffreylesage implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy AT jeffreymmuir implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy AT jonathanrstieber implantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredeviceinconjunctionwithtubularminimallyinvasivediscectomyforlumbardischerniationaretrospectivestudy |
_version_ |
1725184092755984384 |