Differentiated integration contingent on objective ability: a federalist critique

This article is inspired by the 2017 discussions on the future of Europe (in particular some of the ideas debated in the White Paper on the Future of Europe, published by the European Commission) and the events that took place in the crises and post-crises period (aftermath of the financial crisis,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bardutzky Samo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Studies on Federalism 2018-05-01
Series:Perspectives on Federalism
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pof.2018.10.issue-1/pof-2018-0002/pof-2018-0002.xml?format=INT
Description
Summary:This article is inspired by the 2017 discussions on the future of Europe (in particular some of the ideas debated in the White Paper on the Future of Europe, published by the European Commission) and the events that took place in the crises and post-crises period (aftermath of the financial crisis, ongoing refugee crisis and the Brexit shock). It is particularly interested in the scenario of differentiated integration. In this regard, it observes how in the aftermath of the crises, there was a shift in the rationale of differentiated integration with objective (in)ability of the states taking a prominent role. It presents a federalist critique of this development, drawing on the work of Daniel Elazar, discussing the concepts of non-centralization, federal process and federal covenant in the context of the 2017 discussions in the EU.
ISSN:2036-5438