How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach

Morocco’s Water Act of 1995 created River Basin Agencies (RBAs) designed to implement water policy according to the international standard of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). This institutional development was accompanied by new claims regarding the management and preservation of nat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kévin Del Vecchio, Sylvain Barone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2018-10-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol11/v11issue3/458-a11-3-11/file
id doaj-068c1262dc594e2789690dc09c64f196
record_format Article
spelling doaj-068c1262dc594e2789690dc09c64f1962020-11-24T22:31:24ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752018-10-01113638662How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach Kévin Del Vecchio0Sylvain Barone1Sciences Po Lyon, UMR Triangle, Lyon; and UMR G-EAU, MontpellierUniversity of Montpellier Morocco’s Water Act of 1995 created River Basin Agencies (RBAs) designed to implement water policy according to the international standard of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). This institutional development was accompanied by new claims regarding the management and preservation of natural resources, including groundwater resources. Aquifer contracts were introduced for this purpose. This article aims to analyse their implementation and seeks to explain both the change and continuity in groundwater policy. Through a neoinstitutional approach it highlights the historical and long-term processes and institutional factors behind groundwater policy outputs. It stresses the influence of bureaucratic interests and sectoral competition on the development and implementation of groundwater policy in Morocco. Finally, this article shows that, while the main policy objectives have changed very little as supply-side mechanisms remain dominant, the process of implementation is neither linear nor guided by a single, central rationale.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol11/v11issue3/458-a11-3-11/fileGroundwaterpublic policyadministrationneo-institutionalismMorocco
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kévin Del Vecchio
Sylvain Barone
spellingShingle Kévin Del Vecchio
Sylvain Barone
How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
Water Alternatives
Groundwater
public policy
administration
neo-institutionalism
Morocco
author_facet Kévin Del Vecchio
Sylvain Barone
author_sort Kévin Del Vecchio
title How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
title_short How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
title_full How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
title_fullStr How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
title_full_unstemmed How has Morocco’s groundwater policy changed? Lessons from the institutional approach
title_sort how has morocco’s groundwater policy changed? lessons from the institutional approach
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Morocco’s Water Act of 1995 created River Basin Agencies (RBAs) designed to implement water policy according to the international standard of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). This institutional development was accompanied by new claims regarding the management and preservation of natural resources, including groundwater resources. Aquifer contracts were introduced for this purpose. This article aims to analyse their implementation and seeks to explain both the change and continuity in groundwater policy. Through a neoinstitutional approach it highlights the historical and long-term processes and institutional factors behind groundwater policy outputs. It stresses the influence of bureaucratic interests and sectoral competition on the development and implementation of groundwater policy in Morocco. Finally, this article shows that, while the main policy objectives have changed very little as supply-side mechanisms remain dominant, the process of implementation is neither linear nor guided by a single, central rationale.
topic Groundwater
public policy
administration
neo-institutionalism
Morocco
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol11/v11issue3/458-a11-3-11/file
work_keys_str_mv AT kevindelvecchio howhasmoroccosgroundwaterpolicychangedlessonsfromtheinstitutionalapproach
AT sylvainbarone howhasmoroccosgroundwaterpolicychangedlessonsfromtheinstitutionalapproach
_version_ 1725737296791076864