Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies

Abstract Quantitative evidence of light use efficiency (LUE) controls on water use efficiency (WUE) is lacking, especially comparatively across row crops. Field research experiments (2016–2018) were set up for maize (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meetpal S. Kukal, Suat Irmak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20110
id doaj-068522807a104d228435e8a49bc7a7ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-068522807a104d228435e8a49bc7a7ec2021-02-19T11:21:43ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962020-01-0131n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20110Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopiesMeetpal S. Kukal0Suat Irmak1Dep. of Biological Systems Engineering Univ. of Nebraska 105 L.W. Chase Hall Lincoln NE 68583 USADep. of Biological Systems Engineering Univ. of Nebraska 239 L.W. Chase Hall Lincoln NE 68583 USAAbstract Quantitative evidence of light use efficiency (LUE) controls on water use efficiency (WUE) is lacking, especially comparatively across row crops. Field research experiments (2016–2018) were set up for maize (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), under optimal growth conditions in dry sub‐humid conditions. Overall, LUE was able to explain 52% of variance in WUE, and were related as WUE = 1.73 LUE, although crop‐specific variation was observed. Highest sensitivity of WUE to changes in LUE was found in sorghum, followed by soybean, winter wheat, and maize. Evapotranspiration per unit light absorbed by crop canopy, which is a measure of canopy conductance (gc) ranged from a minimum of 0.45 kg H2O MJ−1 in sorghum to a maximum of 0.68 kg H2O MJ−1 in maize. Slopes of WUE vs. LUE relationship were limited by energy‐limited upper ceiling of latent heat of vaporization and characterized distribution of absorbed energy into latent heat of vaporization and sensible heat. Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) accounted for 41% of variability in the WUE vs. LUE relationship, and the relationship was subject to change with VPD conditions higher or lower than 0.85 kPa. Seasonal evolution of crop‐specific gc was modeled and communicated as a function of heat accumulation during the growing season. The research findings contribute to quantification of critical parameters that bridge water and light use efficiency, and better understanding of the resource use in C3 and C4 agricultural row crops.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20110
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meetpal S. Kukal
Suat Irmak
spellingShingle Meetpal S. Kukal
Suat Irmak
Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
author_facet Meetpal S. Kukal
Suat Irmak
author_sort Meetpal S. Kukal
title Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
title_short Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
title_full Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
title_fullStr Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
title_full_unstemmed Interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
title_sort interrelationships between water use efficiency and light use efficiency in four row crop canopies
publisher Wiley
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
issn 2639-6696
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Quantitative evidence of light use efficiency (LUE) controls on water use efficiency (WUE) is lacking, especially comparatively across row crops. Field research experiments (2016–2018) were set up for maize (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), under optimal growth conditions in dry sub‐humid conditions. Overall, LUE was able to explain 52% of variance in WUE, and were related as WUE = 1.73 LUE, although crop‐specific variation was observed. Highest sensitivity of WUE to changes in LUE was found in sorghum, followed by soybean, winter wheat, and maize. Evapotranspiration per unit light absorbed by crop canopy, which is a measure of canopy conductance (gc) ranged from a minimum of 0.45 kg H2O MJ−1 in sorghum to a maximum of 0.68 kg H2O MJ−1 in maize. Slopes of WUE vs. LUE relationship were limited by energy‐limited upper ceiling of latent heat of vaporization and characterized distribution of absorbed energy into latent heat of vaporization and sensible heat. Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) accounted for 41% of variability in the WUE vs. LUE relationship, and the relationship was subject to change with VPD conditions higher or lower than 0.85 kPa. Seasonal evolution of crop‐specific gc was modeled and communicated as a function of heat accumulation during the growing season. The research findings contribute to quantification of critical parameters that bridge water and light use efficiency, and better understanding of the resource use in C3 and C4 agricultural row crops.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20110
work_keys_str_mv AT meetpalskukal interrelationshipsbetweenwateruseefficiencyandlightuseefficiencyinfourrowcropcanopies
AT suatirmak interrelationshipsbetweenwateruseefficiencyandlightuseefficiencyinfourrowcropcanopies
_version_ 1724261223687520256