Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-03-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
Online Access: | http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9 |
id |
doaj-0680bf9f67b24495800907212b81b671 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0680bf9f67b24495800907212b81b6712020-11-24T21:40:18ZengBMCWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery1749-79222006-03-0111910.1186/1749-7922-1-9Peritonitis: laparoscopic approachAgresta FerdinandoCiardo LuigiMazzarolo GiorgioMichelet IvanOrsi GuidoTrentin GiuseppeBedin Natalino<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to identify the causative pathology and performance of an appropriate operation – can often be accomplished via laparoscopy. There is still a debate of peritonitis as a contraindication to this kind of approach. Aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for abdominal peritonitis emergencies carried out at our institution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From January 1992 and January 2002 a total of 935 patients (mean age 42.3 ± 17.2 years) underwent emergent and/or urgent surgery. Among them, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (of whom 112 -18.7% – with peritonitis), according to the presence of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than two previous major abdominal surgeries or massive bowel distension were not treated Laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not considered contraindication to Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The conversion rate was 23.2% in patients with peritonitis and was mainly due to the presence of dense intra-abdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 5.3% with a postoperative mortality of 1.7%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 85.7% (96 pat.) of cases, and 90.6% (87) of these patients were treated successfully by Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Even if limited by its retrospective feature, the present experience let us to consider the Laparoscopic approach to abdominal peritonitis emergencies a safe and effective as conventional surgery, with a higher diagnostic yield and allows for lesser trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make Laparoscopy a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal peritonitis emergencies.</p> http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Agresta Ferdinando Ciardo Luigi Mazzarolo Giorgio Michelet Ivan Orsi Guido Trentin Giuseppe Bedin Natalino |
spellingShingle |
Agresta Ferdinando Ciardo Luigi Mazzarolo Giorgio Michelet Ivan Orsi Guido Trentin Giuseppe Bedin Natalino Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
author_facet |
Agresta Ferdinando Ciardo Luigi Mazzarolo Giorgio Michelet Ivan Orsi Guido Trentin Giuseppe Bedin Natalino |
author_sort |
Agresta Ferdinando |
title |
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
title_short |
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
title_full |
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
title_fullStr |
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
title_sort |
peritonitis: laparoscopic approach |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
issn |
1749-7922 |
publishDate |
2006-03-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to identify the causative pathology and performance of an appropriate operation – can often be accomplished via laparoscopy. There is still a debate of peritonitis as a contraindication to this kind of approach. Aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for abdominal peritonitis emergencies carried out at our institution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From January 1992 and January 2002 a total of 935 patients (mean age 42.3 ± 17.2 years) underwent emergent and/or urgent surgery. Among them, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (of whom 112 -18.7% – with peritonitis), according to the presence of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than two previous major abdominal surgeries or massive bowel distension were not treated Laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not considered contraindication to Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The conversion rate was 23.2% in patients with peritonitis and was mainly due to the presence of dense intra-abdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 5.3% with a postoperative mortality of 1.7%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 85.7% (96 pat.) of cases, and 90.6% (87) of these patients were treated successfully by Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Even if limited by its retrospective feature, the present experience let us to consider the Laparoscopic approach to abdominal peritonitis emergencies a safe and effective as conventional surgery, with a higher diagnostic yield and allows for lesser trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make Laparoscopy a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal peritonitis emergencies.</p> |
url |
http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT agrestaferdinando peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT ciardoluigi peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT mazzarologiorgio peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT micheletivan peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT orsiguido peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT trentingiuseppe peritonitislaparoscopicapproach AT bedinnatalino peritonitislaparoscopicapproach |
_version_ |
1725926825775857664 |