Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agresta Ferdinando, Ciardo Luigi, Mazzarolo Giorgio, Michelet Ivan, Orsi Guido, Trentin Giuseppe, Bedin Natalino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-03-01
Series:World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Online Access:http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9
id doaj-0680bf9f67b24495800907212b81b671
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0680bf9f67b24495800907212b81b6712020-11-24T21:40:18ZengBMCWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery1749-79222006-03-0111910.1186/1749-7922-1-9Peritonitis: laparoscopic approachAgresta FerdinandoCiardo LuigiMazzarolo GiorgioMichelet IvanOrsi GuidoTrentin GiuseppeBedin Natalino<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to identify the causative pathology and performance of an appropriate operation – can often be accomplished via laparoscopy. There is still a debate of peritonitis as a contraindication to this kind of approach. Aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for abdominal peritonitis emergencies carried out at our institution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From January 1992 and January 2002 a total of 935 patients (mean age 42.3 ± 17.2 years) underwent emergent and/or urgent surgery. Among them, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (of whom 112 -18.7% – with peritonitis), according to the presence of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than two previous major abdominal surgeries or massive bowel distension were not treated Laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not considered contraindication to Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The conversion rate was 23.2% in patients with peritonitis and was mainly due to the presence of dense intra-abdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 5.3% with a postoperative mortality of 1.7%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 85.7% (96 pat.) of cases, and 90.6% (87) of these patients were treated successfully by Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Even if limited by its retrospective feature, the present experience let us to consider the Laparoscopic approach to abdominal peritonitis emergencies a safe and effective as conventional surgery, with a higher diagnostic yield and allows for lesser trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make Laparoscopy a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal peritonitis emergencies.</p> http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agresta Ferdinando
Ciardo Luigi
Mazzarolo Giorgio
Michelet Ivan
Orsi Guido
Trentin Giuseppe
Bedin Natalino
spellingShingle Agresta Ferdinando
Ciardo Luigi
Mazzarolo Giorgio
Michelet Ivan
Orsi Guido
Trentin Giuseppe
Bedin Natalino
Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
author_facet Agresta Ferdinando
Ciardo Luigi
Mazzarolo Giorgio
Michelet Ivan
Orsi Guido
Trentin Giuseppe
Bedin Natalino
author_sort Agresta Ferdinando
title Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
title_short Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
title_full Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
title_fullStr Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
title_full_unstemmed Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
title_sort peritonitis: laparoscopic approach
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Emergency Surgery
issn 1749-7922
publishDate 2006-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment – exploration to identify the causative pathology and performance of an appropriate operation – can often be accomplished via laparoscopy. There is still a debate of peritonitis as a contraindication to this kind of approach. Aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for abdominal peritonitis emergencies carried out at our institution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From January 1992 and January 2002 a total of 935 patients (mean age 42.3 ± 17.2 years) underwent emergent and/or urgent surgery. Among them, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (of whom 112 -18.7% – with peritonitis), according to the presence of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than two previous major abdominal surgeries or massive bowel distension were not treated Laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not considered contraindication to Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The conversion rate was 23.2% in patients with peritonitis and was mainly due to the presence of dense intra-abdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 5.3% with a postoperative mortality of 1.7%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 85.7% (96 pat.) of cases, and 90.6% (87) of these patients were treated successfully by Laparoscopy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Even if limited by its retrospective feature, the present experience let us to consider the Laparoscopic approach to abdominal peritonitis emergencies a safe and effective as conventional surgery, with a higher diagnostic yield and allows for lesser trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make Laparoscopy a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal peritonitis emergencies.</p>
url http://www.wjes.org/content/1/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT agrestaferdinando peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT ciardoluigi peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT mazzarologiorgio peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT micheletivan peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT orsiguido peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT trentingiuseppe peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
AT bedinnatalino peritonitislaparoscopicapproach
_version_ 1725926825775857664