The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau

Abstract This article reviews three classic texts of the French, American-Realist and English schools in International Relations, namely Tout Empire Périra (Duroselle 1992), Politics Among Nations (Morgenthau 1948), and Power Politics (Wight 1978). I argue that Wight’s approach can be regarded as a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno Mendelski
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Series:Contexto Internacional
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200249&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-067ae9cd65ad4c85a9f54bb20bbbad7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-067ae9cd65ad4c85a9f54bb20bbbad7d2020-11-24T21:41:07ZspaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroContexto Internacional1982-024040224926710.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200011S0102-85292018000200249The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and MorgenthauBruno MendelskiAbstract This article reviews three classic texts of the French, American-Realist and English schools in International Relations, namely Tout Empire Périra (Duroselle 1992), Politics Among Nations (Morgenthau 1948), and Power Politics (Wight 1978). I argue that Wight’s approach can be regarded as a middle course between those of Duroselle and Morgenthau, and that Wight adopted this position in order to associate himself with important assumptions by both Duroselle and Morgenthau. In particular, there are similarities between Wight’s concept of ‘international revolution’ and Duroselle’s notion of the ‘unbearable.’ Both are critical of behavioural methods, and both search for recurrences in international relations. As regards Morgenthau, Wight shares with him a Realist view of international anarchy, a classical understanding of ‘national interest,’ and an understanding of ideologies as the legitimation of government actions.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200249&lng=en&tlng=enHistoriography of International RelationsMartin WightJean-Baptiste DuroselleHans MorgenthauMiddle Course
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bruno Mendelski
spellingShingle Bruno Mendelski
The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
Contexto Internacional
Historiography of International Relations
Martin Wight
Jean-Baptiste Duroselle
Hans Morgenthau
Middle Course
author_facet Bruno Mendelski
author_sort Bruno Mendelski
title The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
title_short The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
title_full The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
title_fullStr The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
title_full_unstemmed The Historiography of International Relations: Martin Wight in Fresh Conversation with Duroselle and Morgenthau
title_sort historiography of international relations: martin wight in fresh conversation with duroselle and morgenthau
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
series Contexto Internacional
issn 1982-0240
description Abstract This article reviews three classic texts of the French, American-Realist and English schools in International Relations, namely Tout Empire Périra (Duroselle 1992), Politics Among Nations (Morgenthau 1948), and Power Politics (Wight 1978). I argue that Wight’s approach can be regarded as a middle course between those of Duroselle and Morgenthau, and that Wight adopted this position in order to associate himself with important assumptions by both Duroselle and Morgenthau. In particular, there are similarities between Wight’s concept of ‘international revolution’ and Duroselle’s notion of the ‘unbearable.’ Both are critical of behavioural methods, and both search for recurrences in international relations. As regards Morgenthau, Wight shares with him a Realist view of international anarchy, a classical understanding of ‘national interest,’ and an understanding of ideologies as the legitimation of government actions.
topic Historiography of International Relations
Martin Wight
Jean-Baptiste Duroselle
Hans Morgenthau
Middle Course
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200249&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT brunomendelski thehistoriographyofinternationalrelationsmartinwightinfreshconversationwithduroselleandmorgenthau
AT brunomendelski historiographyofinternationalrelationsmartinwightinfreshconversationwithduroselleandmorgenthau
_version_ 1725922980445290496