EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)

In the civil jurisdiction, truth searched is the formal truth. This matter of course different from the criminal justice, where truth searched is material truth. Searching the formal truth, meaning that judge may not be abysmal of boundary that raised by the parties. This matter contain the congenia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Muflichah, Trusto Subekti, Haedah Faradz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jenderal Soedirman University 2008-05-01
Series:Journal of Dinamika Hukum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/48/217
id doaj-06708dca55634d5fb0132ef154d98c93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06708dca55634d5fb0132ef154d98c932020-11-25T02:34:23ZengJenderal Soedirman UniversityJournal of Dinamika Hukum1410-07972407-65622008-05-0182121130EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)Siti Muflichah0Trusto Subekti1 Haedah Faradz2Faculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityFaculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityFaculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityIn the civil jurisdiction, truth searched is the formal truth. This matter of course different from the criminal justice, where truth searched is material truth. Searching the formal truth, meaning that judge may not be abysmal of boundary that raised by the parties. This matter contain the congeniality, that verification process is not see at wight or content, but to wide of case scope or dispute that raised by the parties. In this case judge have the passive character. in civil jurisdiction, truth searched is a truth that relying on formal verification. The Judge decision shall contain the rule of law element, justice and benefit. For the reason judge have to careful, goodness in making draft of decision and also decision intake later. In Case No. 401/ Pdt / 2002 / PT. Smg, The Judge of High Court of middle of Java made the decision by strengthening decision of District Court of Purwokerto in case No. 41/Pdt.G/2000/PN Pwt. This Judge Decision represent an example of careless of the judge in make decision. exception of the lack of party had refused. Therefore, judge have to consider this matter in its decision. Therefore, judge have to consider this matter in its decision. This matter of course relative harm the plaintiff, because if suing is not accepted, plaintiff can improve/ repair its suing or make a lawsuit to the court newly again. But refusedly of suing make the plaintiff cannot improve/ repair its suing or make the new suing again. finally, the decision which is not careful will not fulfill the rule of law elements, justice and benefit.http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/48/217kebenaran formilpenggugattergugatturut tergugatsyarat formil gugatan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siti Muflichah
Trusto Subekti
Haedah Faradz
spellingShingle Siti Muflichah
Trusto Subekti
Haedah Faradz
EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
Journal of Dinamika Hukum
kebenaran formil
penggugat
tergugat
turut tergugat
syarat formil gugatan
author_facet Siti Muflichah
Trusto Subekti
Haedah Faradz
author_sort Siti Muflichah
title EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
title_short EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
title_full EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
title_fullStr EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
title_full_unstemmed EKSEPSI PLURIUM LITIS CONSORTIUM (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang No. 401/Pdt/2002/PT. Smg jo. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto No.41/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Pwt)
title_sort eksepsi plurium litis consortium (studi terhadap putusan pengadilan tinggi semarang no. 401/pdt/2002/pt. smg jo. putusan pengadilan negeri purwokerto no.41/pdt.g/2000/pn.pwt)
publisher Jenderal Soedirman University
series Journal of Dinamika Hukum
issn 1410-0797
2407-6562
publishDate 2008-05-01
description In the civil jurisdiction, truth searched is the formal truth. This matter of course different from the criminal justice, where truth searched is material truth. Searching the formal truth, meaning that judge may not be abysmal of boundary that raised by the parties. This matter contain the congeniality, that verification process is not see at wight or content, but to wide of case scope or dispute that raised by the parties. In this case judge have the passive character. in civil jurisdiction, truth searched is a truth that relying on formal verification. The Judge decision shall contain the rule of law element, justice and benefit. For the reason judge have to careful, goodness in making draft of decision and also decision intake later. In Case No. 401/ Pdt / 2002 / PT. Smg, The Judge of High Court of middle of Java made the decision by strengthening decision of District Court of Purwokerto in case No. 41/Pdt.G/2000/PN Pwt. This Judge Decision represent an example of careless of the judge in make decision. exception of the lack of party had refused. Therefore, judge have to consider this matter in its decision. Therefore, judge have to consider this matter in its decision. This matter of course relative harm the plaintiff, because if suing is not accepted, plaintiff can improve/ repair its suing or make a lawsuit to the court newly again. But refusedly of suing make the plaintiff cannot improve/ repair its suing or make the new suing again. finally, the decision which is not careful will not fulfill the rule of law elements, justice and benefit.
topic kebenaran formil
penggugat
tergugat
turut tergugat
syarat formil gugatan
url http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/48/217
work_keys_str_mv AT sitimuflichah eksepsipluriumlitisconsortiumstuditerhadapputusanpengadilantinggisemarangno401pdt2002ptsmgjoputusanpengadilannegeripurwokertono41pdtg2000pnpwt
AT trustosubekti eksepsipluriumlitisconsortiumstuditerhadapputusanpengadilantinggisemarangno401pdt2002ptsmgjoputusanpengadilannegeripurwokertono41pdtg2000pnpwt
AT haedahfaradz eksepsipluriumlitisconsortiumstuditerhadapputusanpengadilantinggisemarangno401pdt2002ptsmgjoputusanpengadilannegeripurwokertono41pdtg2000pnpwt
_version_ 1724809198698496000