Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fifty thousand knee replacements are performed annually in the UK at an estimated cost of £150 million. Post-operative improvement depends on a number of factors including implant design and patient associated factors. To our knowled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wynn-Jones Charles, Dos Remedios Ian, Rahmatalla Aziz, Sayana Murali, Datir Sandeep, Walley Gayle, Bridgman Stephen, Maffulli Nicola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-08-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/87
id doaj-06578a68fe2648059bbafa8e3660b0e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06578a68fe2648059bbafa8e3660b0e42020-11-25T01:03:10ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742007-08-01818710.1186/1471-2474-8-87Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trialWynn-Jones CharlesDos Remedios IanRahmatalla AzizSayana MuraliDatir SandeepWalley GayleBridgman StephenMaffulli Nicola<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fifty thousand knee replacements are performed annually in the UK at an estimated cost of £150 million. Post-operative improvement depends on a number of factors including implant design and patient associated factors. To our knowledge there are no published study's comparing the results of AP glide and rotating platform designs of LCS knee arthroplasty. Therefore we feel that a study is required to investigate and compare the effects of two types of LCS total knee arthroplasty on joint proprioception and range of motion.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Patients will be randomised to receive either a LCS AP glide or Rotating platform prosthesis. Clinical scores (Oxford knee score, American knee society score, EuroQol), range of motion and proprioception will be assessed prior to and at 3,6, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Proprioception will be assessed in terms of absolute error angle (mean difference between the target angle and the response angle). Knee angles will be measured in degrees using an electromagnetic tracking device, Polhemus 3Space Fastrak that detects positions of sensors placed on the test limb. Student's t-test will be used to compare the mean of two groups.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Evidence is lacking concerning the best prosthesis to use for patients undergoing total knee replacement. This pragmatic randomised trial will test the null hypothesis that anteroposterior glide LCS knee arthroplasty does not result in better post operative knee motion and proprioception as compared to rotating platform LCS knee.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ISRCTN52943804</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/87
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wynn-Jones Charles
Dos Remedios Ian
Rahmatalla Aziz
Sayana Murali
Datir Sandeep
Walley Gayle
Bridgman Stephen
Maffulli Nicola
spellingShingle Wynn-Jones Charles
Dos Remedios Ian
Rahmatalla Aziz
Sayana Murali
Datir Sandeep
Walley Gayle
Bridgman Stephen
Maffulli Nicola
Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet Wynn-Jones Charles
Dos Remedios Ian
Rahmatalla Aziz
Sayana Murali
Datir Sandeep
Walley Gayle
Bridgman Stephen
Maffulli Nicola
author_sort Wynn-Jones Charles
title Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (lcs) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2007-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fifty thousand knee replacements are performed annually in the UK at an estimated cost of £150 million. Post-operative improvement depends on a number of factors including implant design and patient associated factors. To our knowledge there are no published study's comparing the results of AP glide and rotating platform designs of LCS knee arthroplasty. Therefore we feel that a study is required to investigate and compare the effects of two types of LCS total knee arthroplasty on joint proprioception and range of motion.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Patients will be randomised to receive either a LCS AP glide or Rotating platform prosthesis. Clinical scores (Oxford knee score, American knee society score, EuroQol), range of motion and proprioception will be assessed prior to and at 3,6, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Proprioception will be assessed in terms of absolute error angle (mean difference between the target angle and the response angle). Knee angles will be measured in degrees using an electromagnetic tracking device, Polhemus 3Space Fastrak that detects positions of sensors placed on the test limb. Student's t-test will be used to compare the mean of two groups.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Evidence is lacking concerning the best prosthesis to use for patients undergoing total knee replacement. This pragmatic randomised trial will test the null hypothesis that anteroposterior glide LCS knee arthroplasty does not result in better post operative knee motion and proprioception as compared to rotating platform LCS knee.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ISRCTN52943804</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/87
work_keys_str_mv AT wynnjonescharles anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dosremediosian anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rahmatallaaziz anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sayanamurali anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT datirsandeep anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walleygayle anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bridgmanstephen anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maffullinicola anteroposteriorglideversusrotatingplatformlowcontactstresslcskneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725202050259615744