Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
Abstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. T...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-w |
id |
doaj-064a65d76d174f408cd06952d69faeeb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-064a65d76d174f408cd06952d69faeeb2020-11-25T02:40:36ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-06-012011610.1186/s12885-020-07006-wElective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinomaQigen Fang0Hua Gao1Qing Gao2Jinlan Sun3Peng Li4Meng Cui5Enxi Zhang6Wenlong Yin7Yuanyuan Dong8Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Central Hospital of YingkouDisease Control and Prevention CenterDepartment of Oral Medicine, Central Hospital of YingkouDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalAbstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. The patients were divided into two groups based on the nonrandomized management of the neck: 125 patients received END, and 50 patients were exposed to the wait-and-see policy. The main study endpoints were locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients were asked to complete the shoulder domain in the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire, version 4, 1 year postoperatively. Results Ten of the patients undergoing END developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 92%. Five patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 90%. The difference was not significant (p = 0.668). There were 6 deaths in patients undergoing END, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%. There were 3 deaths in patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%; the difference was not significant (p = 0.777). The mean shoulder scores of patients undergoing END and the wait-and-see policy were 93.9 and 100, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.284). Conclusion Elective neck dissection does not carry a survival benefit compared to the wait-and-see policy, and it is not suggested for patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-wBuccal squamous cell carcinomaElective neck dissectionEarly-stage oral squamous cell carcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaOccult lymph node metastasis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Qigen Fang Hua Gao Qing Gao Jinlan Sun Peng Li Meng Cui Enxi Zhang Wenlong Yin Yuanyuan Dong |
spellingShingle |
Qigen Fang Hua Gao Qing Gao Jinlan Sun Peng Li Meng Cui Enxi Zhang Wenlong Yin Yuanyuan Dong Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma BMC Cancer Buccal squamous cell carcinoma Elective neck dissection Early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Occult lymph node metastasis |
author_facet |
Qigen Fang Hua Gao Qing Gao Jinlan Sun Peng Li Meng Cui Enxi Zhang Wenlong Yin Yuanyuan Dong |
author_sort |
Qigen Fang |
title |
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
title_short |
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full |
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr |
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
title_sort |
elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in ct1n0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. The patients were divided into two groups based on the nonrandomized management of the neck: 125 patients received END, and 50 patients were exposed to the wait-and-see policy. The main study endpoints were locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients were asked to complete the shoulder domain in the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire, version 4, 1 year postoperatively. Results Ten of the patients undergoing END developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 92%. Five patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 90%. The difference was not significant (p = 0.668). There were 6 deaths in patients undergoing END, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%. There were 3 deaths in patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%; the difference was not significant (p = 0.777). The mean shoulder scores of patients undergoing END and the wait-and-see policy were 93.9 and 100, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.284). Conclusion Elective neck dissection does not carry a survival benefit compared to the wait-and-see policy, and it is not suggested for patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. |
topic |
Buccal squamous cell carcinoma Elective neck dissection Early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Occult lymph node metastasis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qigenfang electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT huagao electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT qinggao electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT jinlansun electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT pengli electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT mengcui electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT enxizhang electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT wenlongyin electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma AT yuanyuandong electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma |
_version_ |
1724780606996348928 |