Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qigen Fang, Hua Gao, Qing Gao, Jinlan Sun, Peng Li, Meng Cui, Enxi Zhang, Wenlong Yin, Yuanyuan Dong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-w
id doaj-064a65d76d174f408cd06952d69faeeb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-064a65d76d174f408cd06952d69faeeb2020-11-25T02:40:36ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-06-012011610.1186/s12885-020-07006-wElective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinomaQigen Fang0Hua Gao1Qing Gao2Jinlan Sun3Peng Li4Meng Cui5Enxi Zhang6Wenlong Yin7Yuanyuan Dong8Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Central Hospital of YingkouDisease Control and Prevention CenterDepartment of Oral Medicine, Central Hospital of YingkouDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalDepartment of Oral Medicine, Kaifeng Central HospitalAbstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. The patients were divided into two groups based on the nonrandomized management of the neck: 125 patients received END, and 50 patients were exposed to the wait-and-see policy. The main study endpoints were locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients were asked to complete the shoulder domain in the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire, version 4, 1 year postoperatively. Results Ten of the patients undergoing END developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 92%. Five patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 90%. The difference was not significant (p = 0.668). There were 6 deaths in patients undergoing END, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%. There were 3 deaths in patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%; the difference was not significant (p = 0.777). The mean shoulder scores of patients undergoing END and the wait-and-see policy were 93.9 and 100, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.284). Conclusion Elective neck dissection does not carry a survival benefit compared to the wait-and-see policy, and it is not suggested for patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-wBuccal squamous cell carcinomaElective neck dissectionEarly-stage oral squamous cell carcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaOccult lymph node metastasis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qigen Fang
Hua Gao
Qing Gao
Jinlan Sun
Peng Li
Meng Cui
Enxi Zhang
Wenlong Yin
Yuanyuan Dong
spellingShingle Qigen Fang
Hua Gao
Qing Gao
Jinlan Sun
Peng Li
Meng Cui
Enxi Zhang
Wenlong Yin
Yuanyuan Dong
Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
BMC Cancer
Buccal squamous cell carcinoma
Elective neck dissection
Early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Occult lymph node metastasis
author_facet Qigen Fang
Hua Gao
Qing Gao
Jinlan Sun
Peng Li
Meng Cui
Enxi Zhang
Wenlong Yin
Yuanyuan Dong
author_sort Qigen Fang
title Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort elective neck dissection versus wait-and-see policy in ct1n0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Our goal was to clarify the comparison between elective neck dissection (END) and the wait-and-see policy in neck management for cT1N0 buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods This was a retrospective comparison of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC. The patients were divided into two groups based on the nonrandomized management of the neck: 125 patients received END, and 50 patients were exposed to the wait-and-see policy. The main study endpoints were locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients were asked to complete the shoulder domain in the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire, version 4, 1 year postoperatively. Results Ten of the patients undergoing END developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 92%. Five patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy developed recurrence, and the 5-year LRC rate was 90%. The difference was not significant (p = 0.668). There were 6 deaths in patients undergoing END, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%. There were 3 deaths in patients undergoing the wait-and-see policy, and the 5-year DSS rate was 94%; the difference was not significant (p = 0.777). The mean shoulder scores of patients undergoing END and the wait-and-see policy were 93.9 and 100, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.284). Conclusion Elective neck dissection does not carry a survival benefit compared to the wait-and-see policy, and it is not suggested for patients with cT1N0 buccal SCC.
topic Buccal squamous cell carcinoma
Elective neck dissection
Early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Occult lymph node metastasis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07006-w
work_keys_str_mv AT qigenfang electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT huagao electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT qinggao electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT jinlansun electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT pengli electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT mengcui electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT enxizhang electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wenlongyin electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yuanyuandong electiveneckdissectionversuswaitandseepolicyinct1n0buccalsquamouscellcarcinoma
_version_ 1724780606996348928