THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute for Research and European Studies
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Liberty and International Affairs |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e |
id |
doaj-0641f214a1874b38a6646876b22a1b56 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0641f214a1874b38a6646876b22a1b562020-11-25T03:08:46ZengInstitute for Research and European StudiesJournal of Liberty and International Affairs1857-97601857-97602015-04-0111THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESMladen Karadjoski One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks. For these reasons, the main goal of this paper will be to give an answer of the dilemma whether the Accession Dialogue for Macedonia is an accelerator of the entrance in the European Union, or is just a sophisticated tool for delay of the start of the negotiations for final accession. The expected results will correspond with the future EU plans for Macedonia, but also for the other Western Balkan countries, i.e. we will try to examine whether these countries have a realistic perspective for entrance in the European Union, or they are just a “declarative décor” for the vocabulary of the Brussels diplomats and member countries representatives. That will help to determine i.e. to try to predict the next steps of these countries, connected with the European integration, regardless of the actual constellation in the European Union concerning the Enlargement policy. The descriptive method, content analyses method, comparative method, but also the inductive and deductive methods will be used in this paper. http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eaccessionbenchmarkdialoguenegotiationsintegration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mladen Karadjoski |
spellingShingle |
Mladen Karadjoski THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES Journal of Liberty and International Affairs accession benchmark dialogue negotiations integration |
author_facet |
Mladen Karadjoski |
author_sort |
Mladen Karadjoski |
title |
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES |
title_short |
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES |
title_full |
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES |
title_fullStr |
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES |
title_sort |
high level accession dialogue for macedonia: advantages and disadvantages |
publisher |
Institute for Research and European Studies |
series |
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs |
issn |
1857-9760 1857-9760 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks. For these reasons, the main goal of this paper will be to give an answer of the dilemma whether the Accession Dialogue for Macedonia is an accelerator of the entrance in the European Union, or is just a sophisticated tool for delay of the start of the negotiations for final accession. The expected results will correspond with the future EU plans for Macedonia, but also for the other Western Balkan countries, i.e. we will try to examine whether these countries have a realistic perspective for entrance in the European Union, or they are just a “declarative décor” for the vocabulary of the Brussels diplomats and member countries representatives. That will help to determine i.e. to try to predict the next steps of these countries, connected with the European integration, regardless of the actual constellation in the European Union concerning the Enlargement policy. The descriptive method, content analyses method, comparative method, but also the inductive and deductive methods will be used in this paper.
|
topic |
accession benchmark dialogue negotiations integration |
url |
http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mladenkaradjoski thehighlevelaccessiondialogueformacedoniaadvantagesanddisadvantages AT mladenkaradjoski highlevelaccessiondialogueformacedoniaadvantagesanddisadvantages |
_version_ |
1724664348396224512 |