THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mladen Karadjoski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute for Research and European Studies 2015-04-01
Series:Journal of Liberty and International Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
id doaj-0641f214a1874b38a6646876b22a1b56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0641f214a1874b38a6646876b22a1b562020-11-25T03:08:46ZengInstitute for Research and European StudiesJournal of Liberty and International Affairs1857-97601857-97602015-04-0111THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESMladen Karadjoski One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks. For these reasons, the main goal of this paper will be to give an answer of the dilemma whether the Accession Dialogue for Macedonia is an accelerator of the entrance in the European Union, or is just a sophisticated tool for delay of the start of the negotiations for final accession. The expected results will correspond with the future EU plans for Macedonia, but also for the other Western Balkan countries, i.e. we will try to examine whether these countries have a realistic perspective for entrance in the European Union, or they are just a “declarative décor” for the vocabulary of the Brussels diplomats and member countries representatives. That will help to determine i.e. to try to predict the next steps of these countries, connected with the European integration, regardless of the actual constellation in the European Union concerning the Enlargement policy. The descriptive method, content analyses method, comparative method, but also the inductive and deductive methods will be used in this paper. http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eaccessionbenchmarkdialoguenegotiationsintegration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mladen Karadjoski
spellingShingle Mladen Karadjoski
THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs
accession
benchmark
dialogue
negotiations
integration
author_facet Mladen Karadjoski
author_sort Mladen Karadjoski
title THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
title_short THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
title_full THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
title_fullStr THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
title_full_unstemmed THE HIGH LEVEL ACCESSION DIALOGUE FOR MACEDONIA: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
title_sort high level accession dialogue for macedonia: advantages and disadvantages
publisher Institute for Research and European Studies
series Journal of Liberty and International Affairs
issn 1857-9760
1857-9760
publishDate 2015-04-01
description One of the strategic goals for the Republic of Macedonia is membership in the European Union. At the end of 2011, the Commission launched a so-called High Level Accession Dialogue for Macedonia, with a possibility to start the negotiations after the fulfillment of the Dialogue goals and benchmarks. For these reasons, the main goal of this paper will be to give an answer of the dilemma whether the Accession Dialogue for Macedonia is an accelerator of the entrance in the European Union, or is just a sophisticated tool for delay of the start of the negotiations for final accession. The expected results will correspond with the future EU plans for Macedonia, but also for the other Western Balkan countries, i.e. we will try to examine whether these countries have a realistic perspective for entrance in the European Union, or they are just a “declarative décor” for the vocabulary of the Brussels diplomats and member countries representatives. That will help to determine i.e. to try to predict the next steps of these countries, connected with the European integration, regardless of the actual constellation in the European Union concerning the Enlargement policy. The descriptive method, content analyses method, comparative method, but also the inductive and deductive methods will be used in this paper.
topic accession
benchmark
dialogue
negotiations
integration
url http://e-jlia.com/index.php?page=paper-details&id=949051394_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
work_keys_str_mv AT mladenkaradjoski thehighlevelaccessiondialogueformacedoniaadvantagesanddisadvantages
AT mladenkaradjoski highlevelaccessiondialogueformacedoniaadvantagesanddisadvantages
_version_ 1724664348396224512