Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Objective</h4>Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive approach that can alter brain excitability. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of tDCS in improving language and movement function in stroke patients. However, the effect of tDCS on cognitive func...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ru-Bing Yan, Xiao-Li Zhang, Yong-Hong Li, Jing-Ming Hou, Han Chen, Hong-Liang Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233903
id doaj-06419a9426a64543bb376d7c162ed54e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06419a9426a64543bb376d7c162ed54e2021-03-04T11:18:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023390310.1371/journal.pone.0233903Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ru-Bing YanXiao-Li ZhangYong-Hong LiJing-Ming HouHan ChenHong-Liang Liu<h4>Objective</h4>Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive approach that can alter brain excitability. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of tDCS in improving language and movement function in stroke patients. However, the effect of tDCS on cognitive function after stroke remains uncertain.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform from inception to April 2, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. All statistical analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3, and the mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) were used as the pooled statistics.<h4>Results</h4>Fifteen studies involving 820 participants were included. When compared with passive tDCS, anodal tDCS was associated with improved general cognitive performance as examined by the Minimum Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI 0.91-1.71, P < 0.00001), attention performance (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.11-1.20, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in memory performance (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI -0.67-1.50, P = 0.46).<h4>Conclusions</h4>tDCS is likely to be effective for patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. The evidence for different effects based on population characteristics and stimulation methods was limited, but a real effect cannot be ruled out. More high-quality research in this field is required to determine the potential benefits of tDCS in the treatment of cognitive deficits after stroke and to establish the optimal treatment program.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233903
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ru-Bing Yan
Xiao-Li Zhang
Yong-Hong Li
Jing-Ming Hou
Han Chen
Hong-Liang Liu
spellingShingle Ru-Bing Yan
Xiao-Li Zhang
Yong-Hong Li
Jing-Ming Hou
Han Chen
Hong-Liang Liu
Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ru-Bing Yan
Xiao-Li Zhang
Yong-Hong Li
Jing-Ming Hou
Han Chen
Hong-Liang Liu
author_sort Ru-Bing Yan
title Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Objective</h4>Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive approach that can alter brain excitability. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of tDCS in improving language and movement function in stroke patients. However, the effect of tDCS on cognitive function after stroke remains uncertain.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform from inception to April 2, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. All statistical analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3, and the mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) were used as the pooled statistics.<h4>Results</h4>Fifteen studies involving 820 participants were included. When compared with passive tDCS, anodal tDCS was associated with improved general cognitive performance as examined by the Minimum Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI 0.91-1.71, P < 0.00001), attention performance (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.11-1.20, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in memory performance (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI -0.67-1.50, P = 0.46).<h4>Conclusions</h4>tDCS is likely to be effective for patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. The evidence for different effects based on population characteristics and stimulation methods was limited, but a real effect cannot be ruled out. More high-quality research in this field is required to determine the potential benefits of tDCS in the treatment of cognitive deficits after stroke and to establish the optimal treatment program.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233903
work_keys_str_mv AT rubingyan effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaolizhang effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yonghongli effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingminghou effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanchen effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongliangliu effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoncognitivefunctioninstrokepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1714803992905646080