Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.

We investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana S Cortes, Petri Laukka, Christina Lindahl, Håkan Fischer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5453523?pdf=render
id doaj-0634f63d10ee447fb9984f421457412a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0634f63d10ee447fb9984f421457412a2020-11-24T20:45:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e017842310.1371/journal.pone.0178423Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.Diana S CortesPetri LaukkaChristina LindahlHåkan FischerWe investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by incidental Remember/Know recognition tasks. Results from 600 participants showed that accuracy (hits minus false alarms) was consistently higher for neutral compared to emotional items, whereas accuracy for specific emotions varied across the presentation modalities (i.e., faces, voices, and face-voice combinations). For the subjective sense of recollection ("remember" hits), neutral items received the highest hit rates only for faces, whereas for voices and face-voice combinations anger and fear expressions instead received the highest recollection rates. We also observed better accuracy for items by female expressers, and own-sex bias where female participants displayed memory advantage for female faces and face-voice combinations. Results further suggest that own-sex bias can be explained by recollection, rather than familiarity, rates. Overall, results show that memory for faces and voices may be influenced by the expressions that they carry, as well as by the sex of both items and participants. Emotion expressions may also enhance the subjective sense of recollection without enhancing memory accuracy.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5453523?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana S Cortes
Petri Laukka
Christina Lindahl
Håkan Fischer
spellingShingle Diana S Cortes
Petri Laukka
Christina Lindahl
Håkan Fischer
Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Diana S Cortes
Petri Laukka
Christina Lindahl
Håkan Fischer
author_sort Diana S Cortes
title Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
title_short Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
title_full Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
title_fullStr Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
title_full_unstemmed Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
title_sort memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description We investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by incidental Remember/Know recognition tasks. Results from 600 participants showed that accuracy (hits minus false alarms) was consistently higher for neutral compared to emotional items, whereas accuracy for specific emotions varied across the presentation modalities (i.e., faces, voices, and face-voice combinations). For the subjective sense of recollection ("remember" hits), neutral items received the highest hit rates only for faces, whereas for voices and face-voice combinations anger and fear expressions instead received the highest recollection rates. We also observed better accuracy for items by female expressers, and own-sex bias where female participants displayed memory advantage for female faces and face-voice combinations. Results further suggest that own-sex bias can be explained by recollection, rather than familiarity, rates. Overall, results show that memory for faces and voices may be influenced by the expressions that they carry, as well as by the sex of both items and participants. Emotion expressions may also enhance the subjective sense of recollection without enhancing memory accuracy.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5453523?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dianascortes memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT petrilaukka memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT christinalindahl memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT hakanfischer memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
_version_ 1716815412480442368