Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
This study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institut...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532 |
id |
doaj-061a30013de141a6a98df6e4d49dd433 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-061a30013de141a6a98df6e4d49dd4332020-11-25T00:30:34ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-01-0112253210.3390/su12020532su12020532Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability RisksNatalia Semenova0School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, SwedenThis study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institutional investors to elect to work with more receptive and progressive companies and improve the efficiency of private engagement and dialogue. Stakeholder silence theory and Gond et al.’s model of company perceptions of enablers and barriers to the success of engagement are introduced to analyse the efficiency of private dialogue. The study investigates a proprietary dataset covering the characteristics of 109 complete dialogue processes related to material environmental, social, and corruption issues. The dialogues are led by a professional engagement agent in collaboration with its Nordic clients. The multivariate regression analysis shows that sustainability risk, bureaucracy, and experience are the specific conditions under which the target company can become more receptive to activism by making more progress to address institutional investors’ requests during the hidden dialogue process.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532sustainability risksinvestor activismprivate dialogueengagementefficiency |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natalia Semenova |
spellingShingle |
Natalia Semenova Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks Sustainability sustainability risks investor activism private dialogue engagement efficiency |
author_facet |
Natalia Semenova |
author_sort |
Natalia Semenova |
title |
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks |
title_short |
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks |
title_full |
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks |
title_fullStr |
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks |
title_sort |
company receptivity in private dialogue on sustainability risks |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
This study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institutional investors to elect to work with more receptive and progressive companies and improve the efficiency of private engagement and dialogue. Stakeholder silence theory and Gond et al.’s model of company perceptions of enablers and barriers to the success of engagement are introduced to analyse the efficiency of private dialogue. The study investigates a proprietary dataset covering the characteristics of 109 complete dialogue processes related to material environmental, social, and corruption issues. The dialogues are led by a professional engagement agent in collaboration with its Nordic clients. The multivariate regression analysis shows that sustainability risk, bureaucracy, and experience are the specific conditions under which the target company can become more receptive to activism by making more progress to address institutional investors’ requests during the hidden dialogue process. |
topic |
sustainability risks investor activism private dialogue engagement efficiency |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nataliasemenova companyreceptivityinprivatedialogueonsustainabilityrisks |
_version_ |
1725326131929808896 |