Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks

This study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalia Semenova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532
id doaj-061a30013de141a6a98df6e4d49dd433
record_format Article
spelling doaj-061a30013de141a6a98df6e4d49dd4332020-11-25T00:30:34ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-01-0112253210.3390/su12020532su12020532Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability RisksNatalia Semenova0School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, SwedenThis study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institutional investors to elect to work with more receptive and progressive companies and improve the efficiency of private engagement and dialogue. Stakeholder silence theory and Gond et al.’s model of company perceptions of enablers and barriers to the success of engagement are introduced to analyse the efficiency of private dialogue. The study investigates a proprietary dataset covering the characteristics of 109 complete dialogue processes related to material environmental, social, and corruption issues. The dialogues are led by a professional engagement agent in collaboration with its Nordic clients. The multivariate regression analysis shows that sustainability risk, bureaucracy, and experience are the specific conditions under which the target company can become more receptive to activism by making more progress to address institutional investors’ requests during the hidden dialogue process.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532sustainability risksinvestor activismprivate dialogueengagementefficiency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalia Semenova
spellingShingle Natalia Semenova
Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
Sustainability
sustainability risks
investor activism
private dialogue
engagement
efficiency
author_facet Natalia Semenova
author_sort Natalia Semenova
title Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
title_short Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
title_full Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
title_fullStr Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
title_full_unstemmed Company Receptivity in Private Dialogue on Sustainability Risks
title_sort company receptivity in private dialogue on sustainability risks
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This study examines empirically the efficiency of private collaborative dialogues between Nordic institutional investors and companies included in the MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) World stock market index. It contributes to an understanding of the conditions that allow active institutional investors to elect to work with more receptive and progressive companies and improve the efficiency of private engagement and dialogue. Stakeholder silence theory and Gond et al.’s model of company perceptions of enablers and barriers to the success of engagement are introduced to analyse the efficiency of private dialogue. The study investigates a proprietary dataset covering the characteristics of 109 complete dialogue processes related to material environmental, social, and corruption issues. The dialogues are led by a professional engagement agent in collaboration with its Nordic clients. The multivariate regression analysis shows that sustainability risk, bureaucracy, and experience are the specific conditions under which the target company can become more receptive to activism by making more progress to address institutional investors’ requests during the hidden dialogue process.
topic sustainability risks
investor activism
private dialogue
engagement
efficiency
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/532
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliasemenova companyreceptivityinprivatedialogueonsustainabilityrisks
_version_ 1725326131929808896