Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of newly developed minimal invasive methods for surfactant administration (LISA by using Magill forceps, INSURE) Methods: The research was conducted on 15 patients between 685-2100 gr weight, requiring surfactant administ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasemin Çoban, Erdal Taşkın
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rabia Yılmaz 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54171/712931
id doaj-060be7f639df4e9fade675103f1c8056
record_format Article
spelling doaj-060be7f639df4e9fade675103f1c80562021-08-29T10:32:44ZengRabia YılmazJournal of Contemporary Medicine2667-71802020-12-0110449349810.16899/jcm.7129311809Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress SyndromeYasemin Çoban0Erdal Taşkın1HATAY DEVLET HASTANESİFIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİBackground: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of newly developed minimal invasive methods for surfactant administration (LISA by using Magill forceps, INSURE) Methods: The research was conducted on 15 patients between 685-2100 gr weight, requiring surfactant administration. Poractant alpha, dose 200 mg/kg, was administered to patients with spontaneous breathing on continuous positive airway pressure support. LISA was used to administer surfactant to 7 of 15 patients, whereas 8 of them had surfactant administered using the INSURE method. Results: The data regarding the delivery method, birth weight, gender, prenatal history, usage of steroids, APGAR scores and other data about the patients until hospital discharge were recorded. Desaturation and bradycardia for 3-4 minutes were observed in 71% (5/7) of LISA and 87.5% (7/8) of INSURE cases. Bradycardia was observed in 4 of 8 patients from the INSURE group and positive ventilation was needed. From the INSURE group, 3 patients died; one of 15 had ROP and this patient was from the INSURE group. No difference was found among the groups regarding required duration of O2 and days of hospital stay (p<0.05). The thin catheter group had significantly fewer median days on mechanical ventilation and lower rate of mortality (p<0.05). Conclusions: When there is no need for mechanical ventilation, intubation for surfactant administration was determined not to be necessary in the present study. LISA was observed to be the best method for surfactant administration among the methods without intubation.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54171/712931respiratory distress syndromesurfactantcomplicationsnew methodrespiratuar distres sendromusurfaktankomplikasyonveriliş yöntemicpap
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasemin Çoban
Erdal Taşkın
spellingShingle Yasemin Çoban
Erdal Taşkın
Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
respiratory distress syndrome
surfactant
complications
new method
respiratuar distres sendromu
surfaktan
komplikasyon
veriliş yöntemi
cpap
author_facet Yasemin Çoban
Erdal Taşkın
author_sort Yasemin Çoban
title Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Of Less Invasive Surfactant Delivery Techniques In Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort comparison of less invasive surfactant delivery techniques in respiratory distress syndrome
publisher Rabia Yılmaz
series Journal of Contemporary Medicine
issn 2667-7180
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of newly developed minimal invasive methods for surfactant administration (LISA by using Magill forceps, INSURE) Methods: The research was conducted on 15 patients between 685-2100 gr weight, requiring surfactant administration. Poractant alpha, dose 200 mg/kg, was administered to patients with spontaneous breathing on continuous positive airway pressure support. LISA was used to administer surfactant to 7 of 15 patients, whereas 8 of them had surfactant administered using the INSURE method. Results: The data regarding the delivery method, birth weight, gender, prenatal history, usage of steroids, APGAR scores and other data about the patients until hospital discharge were recorded. Desaturation and bradycardia for 3-4 minutes were observed in 71% (5/7) of LISA and 87.5% (7/8) of INSURE cases. Bradycardia was observed in 4 of 8 patients from the INSURE group and positive ventilation was needed. From the INSURE group, 3 patients died; one of 15 had ROP and this patient was from the INSURE group. No difference was found among the groups regarding required duration of O2 and days of hospital stay (p<0.05). The thin catheter group had significantly fewer median days on mechanical ventilation and lower rate of mortality (p<0.05). Conclusions: When there is no need for mechanical ventilation, intubation for surfactant administration was determined not to be necessary in the present study. LISA was observed to be the best method for surfactant administration among the methods without intubation.
topic respiratory distress syndrome
surfactant
complications
new method
respiratuar distres sendromu
surfaktan
komplikasyon
veriliş yöntemi
cpap
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54171/712931
work_keys_str_mv AT yasemincoban comparisonoflessinvasivesurfactantdeliverytechniquesinrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT erdaltaskın comparisonoflessinvasivesurfactantdeliverytechniquesinrespiratorydistresssyndrome
_version_ 1721187225120538624