Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?

The proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Market contains a proposal to harmonise protection of copyright in the digital market and to close the so-called ‘value gap’. The value gap is a term that, in the realm of online copyright dissemination, signifies a situation where the right h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Branka Marušić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2017-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/276
id doaj-05dc9222e0b54f9ab799b7a214b1d778
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05dc9222e0b54f9ab799b7a214b1d7782020-11-25T03:58:21ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582017-12-011316919010.3935/cyelp.13.2017.276Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?Branka Marušić0Stockholm UniversityThe proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Market contains a proposal to harmonise protection of copyright in the digital market and to close the so-called ‘value gap’. The value gap is a term that, in the realm of online copyright dissemination, signifies a situation where the right holder (for example, the author of a song) is not adequately remunerated for his or her work. This situation usually occurs when his or her song is made available on an online platform, such as YouTube, and he or she is not paid for the use and enjoyment of the work. The current market mechanism to tackle this problem is done via licensing schemes. This paper will analyse the possible Trojan horse that is hidden in this proposal in order to ask whether, when it comes to online regulation and enforcement of copyright, the deployment of article 114 TFEU is the correct legal basis for the EU to enhance accountability of internet service providers in the regulation and enforcement of copyright.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/276directive on copyright in the digital marketharmonisationvalue gaplicensingcopyrightarticle 114 tfeuinternet service providers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Branka Marušić
spellingShingle Branka Marušić
Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
directive on copyright in the digital market
harmonisation
value gap
licensing
copyright
article 114 tfeu
internet service providers
author_facet Branka Marušić
author_sort Branka Marušić
title Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
title_short Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
title_full Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
title_fullStr Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
title_full_unstemmed Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?
title_sort derogating regulative and enforcement powers in copyright protection in the digital market: a trojan horse for the eu?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Market contains a proposal to harmonise protection of copyright in the digital market and to close the so-called ‘value gap’. The value gap is a term that, in the realm of online copyright dissemination, signifies a situation where the right holder (for example, the author of a song) is not adequately remunerated for his or her work. This situation usually occurs when his or her song is made available on an online platform, such as YouTube, and he or she is not paid for the use and enjoyment of the work. The current market mechanism to tackle this problem is done via licensing schemes. This paper will analyse the possible Trojan horse that is hidden in this proposal in order to ask whether, when it comes to online regulation and enforcement of copyright, the deployment of article 114 TFEU is the correct legal basis for the EU to enhance accountability of internet service providers in the regulation and enforcement of copyright.
topic directive on copyright in the digital market
harmonisation
value gap
licensing
copyright
article 114 tfeu
internet service providers
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/276
work_keys_str_mv AT brankamarusic derogatingregulativeandenforcementpowersincopyrightprotectioninthedigitalmarketatrojanhorsefortheeu
_version_ 1724457674968399872