Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853

From the beginning of the independent period, the leading classes of Argentina faced the need to populate the vast national territory, and the incorporation of foreign inhabitants was from an early date the undisputed solution to that problem. However, despite the broad consensus that existed on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mónica Baretta
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Associação Latino-americana de Estudos do Discurso 2019-07-01
Series:ALED
Subjects:
Online Access:https://raled.comunidadaled.org/index.php/raled/article/view/362
id doaj-05cedf83c38f443ca1e9dc9fd41c0cab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05cedf83c38f443ca1e9dc9fd41c0cab2020-11-25T02:15:33Zspa Associação Latino-americana de Estudos do DiscursoALED2447-95432447-95432019-07-01191405510.35956/v.19.n1.2019.p.40-55274Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853Mónica Baretta0Universidad Nacional de San Martín, CONICETFrom the beginning of the independent period, the leading classes of Argentina faced the need to populate the vast national territory, and the incorporation of foreign inhabitants was from an early date the undisputed solution to that problem. However, despite the broad consensus that existed on the issue, there were divergent points of view about the “type of immigration” that was desired. In this context, during the debates of the Constituent Assembly of 1853, the treatment of the article 14 of the National Constitution gave rise to an argumentation situation (Plantin 2012) that raised the immigration issue when discussing freedom of religion. Supporters and detractors of religious tolerance linked this issue more or less directly with the foreign population that, it was hoped, came to populate the Argentine territory.Thus, in this paper the arguments put into play in this controversy are analyzed, to point out, on the one hand, the polarization and incompatibility of the positions in dispute (Angenot 2008; Amossy 2016) and, on the other, the starting points that are common on both sides of the debate. In this sense, we are interested in investigating the way in which these arguments construct the image of the immigrant, while offering certain representations about the local population and the idea of economic developmenthttps://raled.comunidadaled.org/index.php/raled/article/view/362Polémica. inmigración. Religión. Constitución. Argumentación.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mónica Baretta
spellingShingle Mónica Baretta
Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
ALED
Polémica. inmigración. Religión. Constitución. Argumentación.
author_facet Mónica Baretta
author_sort Mónica Baretta
title Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
title_short Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
title_full Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
title_fullStr Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
title_full_unstemmed Análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la Asamblea Constituyente argentina de 1853
title_sort análisis de una polémica fundacional: inmigración, religión y desarrollo económico en la asamblea constituyente argentina de 1853
publisher Associação Latino-americana de Estudos do Discurso
series ALED
issn 2447-9543
2447-9543
publishDate 2019-07-01
description From the beginning of the independent period, the leading classes of Argentina faced the need to populate the vast national territory, and the incorporation of foreign inhabitants was from an early date the undisputed solution to that problem. However, despite the broad consensus that existed on the issue, there were divergent points of view about the “type of immigration” that was desired. In this context, during the debates of the Constituent Assembly of 1853, the treatment of the article 14 of the National Constitution gave rise to an argumentation situation (Plantin 2012) that raised the immigration issue when discussing freedom of religion. Supporters and detractors of religious tolerance linked this issue more or less directly with the foreign population that, it was hoped, came to populate the Argentine territory.Thus, in this paper the arguments put into play in this controversy are analyzed, to point out, on the one hand, the polarization and incompatibility of the positions in dispute (Angenot 2008; Amossy 2016) and, on the other, the starting points that are common on both sides of the debate. In this sense, we are interested in investigating the way in which these arguments construct the image of the immigrant, while offering certain representations about the local population and the idea of economic development
topic Polémica. inmigración. Religión. Constitución. Argumentación.
url https://raled.comunidadaled.org/index.php/raled/article/view/362
work_keys_str_mv AT monicabaretta analisisdeunapolemicafundacionalinmigracionreligionydesarrolloeconomicoenlaasambleaconstituyenteargentinade1853
_version_ 1724895528393637888