Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is known to be specifically involved in the processing of stimuli with pleasant, rewarding meaning to the observer. By the use of non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously possible to show evidence for this valence speci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Constantin Winker, Maimu A. Rehbein, Dean Sabatinelli, Mira Dohn, Julius Maitzen, Kati Roesmann, Carsten H. Wolters, Volker Arolt, Markus Junghoefer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
MEG
EEG
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00083/full
id doaj-05c2ec390f6a408690dc5b793f8548a9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Constantin Winker
Constantin Winker
Maimu A. Rehbein
Maimu A. Rehbein
Dean Sabatinelli
Mira Dohn
Julius Maitzen
Kati Roesmann
Kati Roesmann
Carsten H. Wolters
Carsten H. Wolters
Volker Arolt
Volker Arolt
Markus Junghoefer
Markus Junghoefer
spellingShingle Constantin Winker
Constantin Winker
Maimu A. Rehbein
Maimu A. Rehbein
Dean Sabatinelli
Mira Dohn
Julius Maitzen
Kati Roesmann
Kati Roesmann
Carsten H. Wolters
Carsten H. Wolters
Volker Arolt
Volker Arolt
Markus Junghoefer
Markus Junghoefer
Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
emotion
brain stimulation
tDCS
MEG
EEG
faces
author_facet Constantin Winker
Constantin Winker
Maimu A. Rehbein
Maimu A. Rehbein
Dean Sabatinelli
Mira Dohn
Julius Maitzen
Kati Roesmann
Kati Roesmann
Carsten H. Wolters
Carsten H. Wolters
Volker Arolt
Volker Arolt
Markus Junghoefer
Markus Junghoefer
author_sort Constantin Winker
title Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
title_short Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
title_full Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
title_fullStr Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing
title_sort noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex indicates valence ambiguity in sad compared to happy and fearful face processing
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is known to be specifically involved in the processing of stimuli with pleasant, rewarding meaning to the observer. By the use of non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously possible to show evidence for this valence specificity and to modulate the impact of the vmPFC on emotional network processing. Prior results showed increased neural activation during pleasant relative to unpleasant stimulus processing after excitatory compared to inhibitory vmPFC-tDCS. As dysfunctional vmPFC activation patterns are associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), tDCS of this region could render an attractive application in future therapy. Here, we investigated vmPFC-tDCS effects on sad compared to happy face processing, as sad faces are often used in the study of mood disorders. After counterbalanced inhibitory or excitatory tDCS, respectively, healthy participants viewed happy and sad faces during magnetoencephalography (MEG) recording. In addition, tDCS effects on an interpretational bias of ambiguous happy-sad face morphs and an attentional bias of a dot-probe task with happy and sad faces as emotional primes were investigated. Finally, in conjoint analyses with data from a previous sibling study (happy and fearful faces) we examined whether excitatory vmPFC-tDCS would reveal a general increase in processing of pleasant stimuli independent of the type of unpleasant stimuli applied (sad vs. fearful faces). MEG and behavioral results showed that happy faces promoted a relative positivity bias after excitatory compared to inhibitory tDCS, visible in left orbitofrontal cortex and in the emotion-primed dot-probe task. A converse pattern in the MEG data during sad face processing suggests the possible involvement of an empathy network and thus significantly differed from neuronal processing of fearful face processing. Implications for the bearing of vmPFC modulation on emotional face processing and the impact of specific unpleasant face expressions are discussed.
topic emotion
brain stimulation
tDCS
MEG
EEG
faces
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00083/full
work_keys_str_mv AT constantinwinker noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT constantinwinker noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT maimuarehbein noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT maimuarehbein noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT deansabatinelli noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT miradohn noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT juliusmaitzen noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT katiroesmann noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT katiroesmann noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT carstenhwolters noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT carstenhwolters noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT volkerarolt noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT volkerarolt noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT markusjunghoefer noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
AT markusjunghoefer noninvasivestimulationoftheventromedialprefrontalcortexindicatesvalenceambiguityinsadcomparedtohappyandfearfulfaceprocessing
_version_ 1725792917191131136
spelling doaj-05c2ec390f6a408690dc5b793f8548a92020-11-24T22:15:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532019-05-011310.3389/fnbeh.2019.00083449768Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face ProcessingConstantin Winker0Constantin Winker1Maimu A. Rehbein2Maimu A. Rehbein3Dean Sabatinelli4Mira Dohn5Julius Maitzen6Kati Roesmann7Kati Roesmann8Carsten H. Wolters9Carsten H. Wolters10Volker Arolt11Volker Arolt12Markus Junghoefer13Markus Junghoefer14Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyDepartment of Psychology and BioImaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United StatesInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyThe ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is known to be specifically involved in the processing of stimuli with pleasant, rewarding meaning to the observer. By the use of non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously possible to show evidence for this valence specificity and to modulate the impact of the vmPFC on emotional network processing. Prior results showed increased neural activation during pleasant relative to unpleasant stimulus processing after excitatory compared to inhibitory vmPFC-tDCS. As dysfunctional vmPFC activation patterns are associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), tDCS of this region could render an attractive application in future therapy. Here, we investigated vmPFC-tDCS effects on sad compared to happy face processing, as sad faces are often used in the study of mood disorders. After counterbalanced inhibitory or excitatory tDCS, respectively, healthy participants viewed happy and sad faces during magnetoencephalography (MEG) recording. In addition, tDCS effects on an interpretational bias of ambiguous happy-sad face morphs and an attentional bias of a dot-probe task with happy and sad faces as emotional primes were investigated. Finally, in conjoint analyses with data from a previous sibling study (happy and fearful faces) we examined whether excitatory vmPFC-tDCS would reveal a general increase in processing of pleasant stimuli independent of the type of unpleasant stimuli applied (sad vs. fearful faces). MEG and behavioral results showed that happy faces promoted a relative positivity bias after excitatory compared to inhibitory tDCS, visible in left orbitofrontal cortex and in the emotion-primed dot-probe task. A converse pattern in the MEG data during sad face processing suggests the possible involvement of an empathy network and thus significantly differed from neuronal processing of fearful face processing. Implications for the bearing of vmPFC modulation on emotional face processing and the impact of specific unpleasant face expressions are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00083/fullemotionbrain stimulationtDCSMEGEEGfaces