A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature

ObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG Dong, ZHANG Tao, WU Yunan
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2017-05-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202
id doaj-05b6a6986f44429687acb85b2f149536
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05b6a6986f44429687acb85b2f1495362020-11-24T22:32:17ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562017-05-0133591992310.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.05.026A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literatureZHANG Dong0ZHANG Tao1WU Yunan2Graduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaGraduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaGraduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury. ResultsA total of 609 articles were included, with 410 articles of case studies and 199 case reports. A total of 15 types of diagnostic criteria were used in China, and only 13.4% of these articles used the causality assessment method recommended by the international community. In 46% of the cases reported in the articles, a diagnosis was made based on clinical symptoms and exclusion of common causes of liver injury. ConclusionThere are many diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China, and the diagnosis is subjective and lacks rigor. http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author ZHANG Dong
ZHANG Tao
WU Yunan
spellingShingle ZHANG Dong
ZHANG Tao
WU Yunan
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
author_facet ZHANG Dong
ZHANG Tao
WU Yunan
author_sort ZHANG Dong
title A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
title_short A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
title_full A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
title_fullStr A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
title_full_unstemmed A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
title_sort systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in china based on the literature
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2017-05-01
description ObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury. ResultsA total of 609 articles were included, with 410 articles of case studies and 199 case reports. A total of 15 types of diagnostic criteria were used in China, and only 13.4% of these articles used the causality assessment method recommended by the international community. In 46% of the cases reported in the articles, a diagnosis was made based on clinical symptoms and exclusion of common causes of liver injury. ConclusionThere are many diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China, and the diagnosis is subjective and lacks rigor.
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangdong asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
AT zhangtao asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
AT wuyunan asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
AT zhangdong systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
AT zhangtao systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
AT wuyunan systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature
_version_ 1725734146261647360