A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagno...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi |
Online Access: | http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202 |
id |
doaj-05b6a6986f44429687acb85b2f149536 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-05b6a6986f44429687acb85b2f1495362020-11-24T22:32:17ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562017-05-0133591992310.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.05.026A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literatureZHANG Dong0ZHANG Tao1WU Yunan2Graduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaGraduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaGraduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury. ResultsA total of 609 articles were included, with 410 articles of case studies and 199 case reports. A total of 15 types of diagnostic criteria were used in China, and only 13.4% of these articles used the causality assessment method recommended by the international community. In 46% of the cases reported in the articles, a diagnosis was made based on clinical symptoms and exclusion of common causes of liver injury. ConclusionThere are many diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China, and the diagnosis is subjective and lacks rigor. http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
zho |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
ZHANG Dong ZHANG Tao WU Yunan |
spellingShingle |
ZHANG Dong ZHANG Tao WU Yunan A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi |
author_facet |
ZHANG Dong ZHANG Tao WU Yunan |
author_sort |
ZHANG Dong |
title |
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature |
title_short |
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature |
title_full |
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature |
title_fullStr |
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China based on the literature |
title_sort |
systematic analysis of the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in china based on the literature |
publisher |
Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology |
series |
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi |
issn |
1001-5256 1001-5256 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China. MethodsCNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles published from 1990 to 2015, and the diagnostic criteria in the articles were recorded to investigate the current application of diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury. ResultsA total of 609 articles were included, with 410 articles of case studies and 199 case reports. A total of 15 types of diagnostic criteria were used in China, and only 13.4% of these articles used the causality assessment method recommended by the international community. In 46% of the cases reported in the articles, a diagnosis was made based on clinical symptoms and exclusion of common causes of liver injury. ConclusionThere are many diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in China, and the diagnosis is subjective and lacks rigor. |
url |
http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=8202 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhangdong asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature AT zhangtao asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature AT wuyunan asystematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature AT zhangdong systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature AT zhangtao systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature AT wuyunan systematicanalysisoftheapplicationofdiagnosticcriteriafordruginducedliverinjuryinchinabasedontheliterature |
_version_ |
1725734146261647360 |