Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically

Background: Auditory midbrain implant users cannot achieve open speech perception and have limited frequency resolution. It remains unclear whether the spread of excitation contributes to this issue and how much it can be compensated by current-focusing, which is an effective approach in cochlear im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gunnar Lennart Quass, Simone Kurt, K. Jannis Hildebrandt, Andrej Kral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-09-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301566
id doaj-05ad48e3a5914188893ca10278ae6bbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05ad48e3a5914188893ca10278ae6bbd2021-03-19T07:12:12ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2018-09-0111511611174Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetricallyGunnar Lennart Quass0Simone Kurt1K. Jannis Hildebrandt2Andrej Kral3Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, Germany; Corresponding author. Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), OE8891, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, GermanyCluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, GermanyInstitute of AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, GermanyBackground: Auditory midbrain implant users cannot achieve open speech perception and have limited frequency resolution. It remains unclear whether the spread of excitation contributes to this issue and how much it can be compensated by current-focusing, which is an effective approach in cochlear implants. Objective: The present study examined the spread of excitation in the cortex elicited by electric midbrain stimulation. We further tested whether current-focusing via bipolar and tripolar stimulation is effective with electric midbrain stimulation and whether these modes hold any advantage over monopolar stimulation also in conditions when the stimulation electrodes are in direct contact with the target tissue. Methods: Using penetrating multielectrode arrays, we recorded cortical population responses to single pulse electric midbrain stimulation in 10 ketamine/xylazine anesthetized mice. We compared monopolar, bipolar, and tripolar stimulation configurations with regard to the spread of excitation and the characteristic frequency difference between the stimulation/recording electrodes. Results: The cortical responses were distributed asymmetrically around the characteristic frequency of the stimulated midbrain region with a strong activation in regions tuned up to one octave higher. We found no significant differences between monopolar, bipolar, and tripolar stimulation in threshold, evoked firing rate, or dynamic range. Conclusion: The cortical responses to electric midbrain stimulation are biased towards higher tonotopic frequencies. Current-focusing is not effective in direct contact electrical stimulation. Electrode maps should account for the asymmetrical spread of excitation when fitting auditory midbrain implants by shifting the frequency-bands downward and stimulating as dorsally as possible.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301566Inferior colliculusAuditory midbrain implantCurrent focusingNeuroprosthetic stimulationHearing lossMouse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gunnar Lennart Quass
Simone Kurt
K. Jannis Hildebrandt
Andrej Kral
spellingShingle Gunnar Lennart Quass
Simone Kurt
K. Jannis Hildebrandt
Andrej Kral
Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
Brain Stimulation
Inferior colliculus
Auditory midbrain implant
Current focusing
Neuroprosthetic stimulation
Hearing loss
Mouse
author_facet Gunnar Lennart Quass
Simone Kurt
K. Jannis Hildebrandt
Andrej Kral
author_sort Gunnar Lennart Quass
title Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
title_short Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
title_full Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
title_fullStr Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
title_full_unstemmed Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
title_sort electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Background: Auditory midbrain implant users cannot achieve open speech perception and have limited frequency resolution. It remains unclear whether the spread of excitation contributes to this issue and how much it can be compensated by current-focusing, which is an effective approach in cochlear implants. Objective: The present study examined the spread of excitation in the cortex elicited by electric midbrain stimulation. We further tested whether current-focusing via bipolar and tripolar stimulation is effective with electric midbrain stimulation and whether these modes hold any advantage over monopolar stimulation also in conditions when the stimulation electrodes are in direct contact with the target tissue. Methods: Using penetrating multielectrode arrays, we recorded cortical population responses to single pulse electric midbrain stimulation in 10 ketamine/xylazine anesthetized mice. We compared monopolar, bipolar, and tripolar stimulation configurations with regard to the spread of excitation and the characteristic frequency difference between the stimulation/recording electrodes. Results: The cortical responses were distributed asymmetrically around the characteristic frequency of the stimulated midbrain region with a strong activation in regions tuned up to one octave higher. We found no significant differences between monopolar, bipolar, and tripolar stimulation in threshold, evoked firing rate, or dynamic range. Conclusion: The cortical responses to electric midbrain stimulation are biased towards higher tonotopic frequencies. Current-focusing is not effective in direct contact electrical stimulation. Electrode maps should account for the asymmetrical spread of excitation when fitting auditory midbrain implants by shifting the frequency-bands downward and stimulating as dorsally as possible.
topic Inferior colliculus
Auditory midbrain implant
Current focusing
Neuroprosthetic stimulation
Hearing loss
Mouse
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18301566
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnarlennartquass electricalstimulationofthemidbrainexcitestheauditorycortexasymmetrically
AT simonekurt electricalstimulationofthemidbrainexcitestheauditorycortexasymmetrically
AT kjannishildebrandt electricalstimulationofthemidbrainexcitestheauditorycortexasymmetrically
AT andrejkral electricalstimulationofthemidbrainexcitestheauditorycortexasymmetrically
_version_ 1724214032486891520