„Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“

It has become common practice in art historical scholarship to interpret Western still life painting under the aspect of transience. This tendency, however, has obscured our view of the various pictorial solutions and types of representation encompassed within the genre, with the result that the sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karin Leonhard, Sandra Hindriks
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: arthistoricum.net 2020-05-01
Series:21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/xxi/article/view/73142
id doaj-05aad7d695dd4448b38169f3e4fc70dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05aad7d695dd4448b38169f3e4fc70dc2021-04-02T19:29:20Zdeuarthistoricum.net21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual2701-15692020-05-011112718010.11588/xxi.2020.1.7314273142„Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“Karin LeonhardSandra HindriksIt has become common practice in art historical scholarship to interpret Western still life painting under the aspect of transience. This tendency, however, has obscured our view of the various pictorial solutions and types of representation encompassed within the genre, with the result that the subgenre of Vanitas still life itself has been neglected. This article aims to reconsider and reassess Vanitas still life by studying the origins and historical contexts that significantly influenced the genre. It starts with a close examination of the meditatio mortis of Saint Jerome who, from the 14th century onwards, enjoyed increasing popularity because his teachings corresponded most closely to humanism and a changed theology of piety. As translator and exegete of Ecclesiastes, the Church Father embodied the model of a new scholarly view of death in which mortality was understood not as punishment but as human condition and, thus, became the object of individual reflection. A decisive turning point in the relationship between Hieronymus imagery and autonomous Vanitas still life, so will be further argued, then occurred in the middle of the 16th century when the Protestant-Calvinist movement, especially in the university city of Leiden, began to take an increasingly critical look at the Hebrew original text of the Bible and its translations and commentaries. Discussions of these texts certainly included the Book of Ecclesiastes and the term hæbæl (“breath of wind”, “(blown) breath/air”, “steam”, “breath”), which serves as a leitmotif there. This term, which is so complex and meaningful in its pictoriality and semantics, found its way into the new genre of Vanitas still life emerging in Leiden around 1600. As will be shown, it is inherent in (or rather underlies) the new genre, which needs to be understood as a speculative pictorial form.https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/xxi/article/view/73142stilllebenvergänglichkeithieronymuskohelet
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karin Leonhard
Sandra Hindriks
spellingShingle Karin Leonhard
Sandra Hindriks
„Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual
stillleben
vergänglichkeit
hieronymus
kohelet
author_facet Karin Leonhard
Sandra Hindriks
author_sort Karin Leonhard
title „Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
title_short „Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
title_full „Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
title_fullStr „Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
title_full_unstemmed „Windhauch, Windhauch, […] das ist alles Windhauch“
title_sort „windhauch, windhauch, […] das ist alles windhauch“
publisher arthistoricum.net
series 21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual
issn 2701-1569
publishDate 2020-05-01
description It has become common practice in art historical scholarship to interpret Western still life painting under the aspect of transience. This tendency, however, has obscured our view of the various pictorial solutions and types of representation encompassed within the genre, with the result that the subgenre of Vanitas still life itself has been neglected. This article aims to reconsider and reassess Vanitas still life by studying the origins and historical contexts that significantly influenced the genre. It starts with a close examination of the meditatio mortis of Saint Jerome who, from the 14th century onwards, enjoyed increasing popularity because his teachings corresponded most closely to humanism and a changed theology of piety. As translator and exegete of Ecclesiastes, the Church Father embodied the model of a new scholarly view of death in which mortality was understood not as punishment but as human condition and, thus, became the object of individual reflection. A decisive turning point in the relationship between Hieronymus imagery and autonomous Vanitas still life, so will be further argued, then occurred in the middle of the 16th century when the Protestant-Calvinist movement, especially in the university city of Leiden, began to take an increasingly critical look at the Hebrew original text of the Bible and its translations and commentaries. Discussions of these texts certainly included the Book of Ecclesiastes and the term hæbæl (“breath of wind”, “(blown) breath/air”, “steam”, “breath”), which serves as a leitmotif there. This term, which is so complex and meaningful in its pictoriality and semantics, found its way into the new genre of Vanitas still life emerging in Leiden around 1600. As will be shown, it is inherent in (or rather underlies) the new genre, which needs to be understood as a speculative pictorial form.
topic stillleben
vergänglichkeit
hieronymus
kohelet
url https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/xxi/article/view/73142
work_keys_str_mv AT karinleonhard windhauchwindhauchdasistalleswindhauch
AT sandrahindriks windhauchwindhauchdasistalleswindhauch
_version_ 1721548659900809216