Axial and shear pullout forces of composite, porcine and human metatarsal and cuboid bones

• Main Authors: Mark Lenz, Boyko Gueorguiev, Juan B. Gerstner Garces, Michael P. Swords, Stefan Rammelt, Gunther O. Hofmann, Ivan Zderic, Manuela Ernst, Robert Geoff Richards, Andrew K. Sands
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
• Series: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X18300226

Objectives: The varying mechanical properties of human bone have influence on the study results. Pullout and shear forces of human bone were compared to different substitutes to evaluate their suitability for biomechanical studies. Methods: After bone mineral density (BMD) determination, axial pullout tests were performed with cortical 3.5 mm nonlocking (NL) and 2.7 mm head locking (HL) screws on human, porcine and polyurethane composite bones. Porcine and human constructs were additionally loaded in shear direction. Results: Apparent BMD was significantly lower in osteoporotic (159 mgHA/ccm ± 56) and nonosteoporotic (229 mgHA/ccm ± 25) human bone than that in porcine bone (325 mgHA/ccm ± 42; p < 0.01). Axial construct stiffness and ultimate pullout force of porcine bone (NL: 666N/mm ± 226, 910N ± 140; HL: 309N/mm ± 88, 744N ± 185) was significantly different from composite bone (NL: 1284N/mm ± 161; 1175N ± 116; HL: 1241N/mm ± 172, 1185N ± 225) and osteoporotic human bone (NL: 204N/mm ± 121, 185N ± 113; HL: 201N/mm ± 65; 189N ± 58) but not from nonosteoporotic human bone (NL: 620N/mm ± 205, 852N ± 281; HL: 399N/mm ± 224; 567N ± 242). Porcine bone exhibited an ultimate shear force (NL: 278N ± 99; HL: 431N ± 155) comparable to nonosteoporotic human bone (NL: 207 ± 68: HL: 374N ± 137). Conclusion: Screw pullout and shear forces of porcine bone are close to nonosteoporotic human bone. The translational potential of this article: Human bone specimens used in biomechanical studies are predominantly of osteoporotic bone quality. Conclusions on nonosteoporotic human bone behaviour are difficult. Alternatives such as porcine bone and composite bone were investigated, and it could be shown that screw pullout and screw shear forces of porcine bone are close to nonosteoporotic human bone. Keywords: Biomechanical testing, Bone substitute, Bone quality, Composite bone, Human bone, Porcine bone