Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?

NPs with adjectival heads (the rich, the French) cannot be used as modifiers in genitive constructions (*the disabled’s working conditions), but require the use of an of-phrase (the working conditions of the disabled). The aim of this paper is to try to account for this syntactic constraint by relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evelyne Chabert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi 2012-11-01
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/188
id doaj-058fcc522827429e96dbebec7f3d1f0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-058fcc522827429e96dbebec7f3d1f0d2020-11-25T01:54:30ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662012-11-011615116310.4000/anglophonia.188Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?Evelyne ChabertNPs with adjectival heads (the rich, the French) cannot be used as modifiers in genitive constructions (*the disabled’s working conditions), but require the use of an of-phrase (the working conditions of the disabled). The aim of this paper is to try to account for this syntactic constraint by relating it to some semantic or pragmatic factor(s) that might explain why adjectival heads invariably trigger the selection of the of-phrase rather than that of the genitive.Such NPs are checked against three models (Henri Adamczewski’s, Ronald Flintham’s, and the author’s own), which are supposed to account for the factors at play in the choice between the genitive and the of-phrase. It appears however that none of these theories provides a satisfying explanation, since the construction in every case is shown to have all the properties required to be compatible with the genitive.The paper argues that the incompatibility is syntactic in essence and that it resides in the elliptic nature of adjectival heads. It also poses the question of the fallibility of semantic or pragmatic models, insofar as the invariant value that they put forward fails to relate the syntactic behaviour of each and every NP to some core semantic or pragmatic factor.http://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/188genitivesyntaxadjectival headssemanticsinvariant valuepragmatics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evelyne Chabert
spellingShingle Evelyne Chabert
Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
Anglophonia
genitive
syntax
adjectival heads
semantics
invariant value
pragmatics
author_facet Evelyne Chabert
author_sort Evelyne Chabert
title Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
title_short Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
title_full Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
title_fullStr Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
title_full_unstemmed Incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
title_sort incompatibilité du génitif et des constructions à tête adjectivale (*the disabled’s working conditions) – invariant sémantique et contrainte syntaxique sont-ils conciliables ?
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
series Anglophonia
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
publishDate 2012-11-01
description NPs with adjectival heads (the rich, the French) cannot be used as modifiers in genitive constructions (*the disabled’s working conditions), but require the use of an of-phrase (the working conditions of the disabled). The aim of this paper is to try to account for this syntactic constraint by relating it to some semantic or pragmatic factor(s) that might explain why adjectival heads invariably trigger the selection of the of-phrase rather than that of the genitive.Such NPs are checked against three models (Henri Adamczewski’s, Ronald Flintham’s, and the author’s own), which are supposed to account for the factors at play in the choice between the genitive and the of-phrase. It appears however that none of these theories provides a satisfying explanation, since the construction in every case is shown to have all the properties required to be compatible with the genitive.The paper argues that the incompatibility is syntactic in essence and that it resides in the elliptic nature of adjectival heads. It also poses the question of the fallibility of semantic or pragmatic models, insofar as the invariant value that they put forward fails to relate the syntactic behaviour of each and every NP to some core semantic or pragmatic factor.
topic genitive
syntax
adjectival heads
semantics
invariant value
pragmatics
url http://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/188
work_keys_str_mv AT evelynechabert incompatibilitedugenitifetdesconstructionsateteadjectivalethedisabledsworkingconditionsinvariantsemantiqueetcontraintesyntaxiquesontilsconciliables
_version_ 1724986990066139136