Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments

The performance of a biased paracentric hemispherical deflection analyzer (HDA), including fringing fields and their effect on focusing and energy resolution, is investigated using numerical methods. Electron energy spectra are calculated for three entry positions R0=84 mm, 100 mm, and 112 mm and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O. Sise
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Spectroscopy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/152647
id doaj-058a701f3ba44ebeb8feec794fd72ba6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-058a701f3ba44ebeb8feec794fd72ba62020-11-24T21:57:48ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Spectroscopy2314-49202314-49392014-01-01201410.1155/2014/152647152647Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of MisalignmentsO. Sise0Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Suleyman Demirel University, 32260 Isparta, TurkeyThe performance of a biased paracentric hemispherical deflection analyzer (HDA), including fringing fields and their effect on focusing and energy resolution, is investigated using numerical methods. Electron energy spectra are calculated for three entry positions R0=84 mm, 100 mm, and 112 mm and compared with the recent experimental measurements. In both experiment and calculation, the two different paracentric entry positions R0=84 mm and R0=112 mm, on either side of the mean radius of 100 mm, are found to have a base energy resolution of about two times better than the conventional centric entry position R0=100 mm. In order to explain the discrepancies (6–30%) between the simulated and the experimental resolutions the focusing characteristics are further investigated for different displacements of the input lens (ΔR0) with respect to the entry position R0 and the tilted input beam axis by αshift in the dispersive direction. We have found that the blame does not in fact lie with the theory and we have shown that the input lens may have been misaligned in the experiment. Slight misalignments affect both the true energy resolution measurement and the transmission of the beam.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/152647
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author O. Sise
spellingShingle O. Sise
Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
Journal of Spectroscopy
author_facet O. Sise
author_sort O. Sise
title Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
title_short Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
title_full Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
title_fullStr Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of Electron Energy Spectra of a Biased Paracentric Hemispherical Deflection Analyzer as a Function of Entry Bias: Effects of Misalignments
title_sort simulation of electron energy spectra of a biased paracentric hemispherical deflection analyzer as a function of entry bias: effects of misalignments
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Spectroscopy
issn 2314-4920
2314-4939
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The performance of a biased paracentric hemispherical deflection analyzer (HDA), including fringing fields and their effect on focusing and energy resolution, is investigated using numerical methods. Electron energy spectra are calculated for three entry positions R0=84 mm, 100 mm, and 112 mm and compared with the recent experimental measurements. In both experiment and calculation, the two different paracentric entry positions R0=84 mm and R0=112 mm, on either side of the mean radius of 100 mm, are found to have a base energy resolution of about two times better than the conventional centric entry position R0=100 mm. In order to explain the discrepancies (6–30%) between the simulated and the experimental resolutions the focusing characteristics are further investigated for different displacements of the input lens (ΔR0) with respect to the entry position R0 and the tilted input beam axis by αshift in the dispersive direction. We have found that the blame does not in fact lie with the theory and we have shown that the input lens may have been misaligned in the experiment. Slight misalignments affect both the true energy resolution measurement and the transmission of the beam.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/152647
work_keys_str_mv AT osise simulationofelectronenergyspectraofabiasedparacentrichemisphericaldeflectionanalyzerasafunctionofentrybiaseffectsofmisalignments
_version_ 1725853401836683264