"Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion
In this paper we investigate the effect of moral suasion on ingroup favouritism. We report a well-powered, pre-registered, two-stage 2x2 mixed-design experiment. In the first stage, groups are formed on the basis of how participants answer a set of questions, concerning non-morally relevant issues i...
Main Authors: | Ennio Bilancini, Leonardo Boncinelli, Valerio Capraro, Tatiana Celadin, Roberto Di Paolo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/191113/jdm191113.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favouritism
by: Jim Albert Charlton Everett, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01) -
The power of moral
words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator
game
by: Valerio Capraro, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Making a “Pledge”: Moral Suasion and Health Promotion Practice
by: Glenn Laverack
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Preschoolers Favor Their Ingroup When Resources Are Limited
by: Kristy Jia Jin Lee, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Reference
dependence, cooperation, and coordination in games
by: Mark Schneider, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)