Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills

In smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Ruppen, Bettina Wolfgramm, Ruth Scheidegger, Hans-Peter Bader
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Mountain Society 2016-02-01
Series:Mountain Research and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1
id doaj-0573b83562344fed8c184af5c91a0514
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0573b83562344fed8c184af5c91a05142020-11-25T01:17:59ZengInternational Mountain SocietyMountain Research and Development0276-47411994-71512016-02-013618090http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's FoothillsSebastian Ruppen0Bettina Wolfgramm1Ruth Scheidegger2Hans-Peter Bader3University of Bern, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandUniversity of Bern, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; bettina.wolfgramm@cde.unibe.ch; bwolfgramm@gmx.chSwiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandSwiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandIn smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and productivity decline, and support more sustainable use of marginal land. Mixed crop/livestock systems are often carefully balanced to minimize risks. Thus, when planning interventions, profound systems knowledge is crucial. However, the data required for system characterization are often scarce, and original field studies are thus necessary. The aim of this research, a case study in Tajikistan, was to improve systems understanding of the biomass cycle in crop/livestock systems in order to quantify the obstacles to the spread of sustainable land management technologies to farming households. It aimed to establish a database and methods of rapid data collection to quantify the stocks and flows of biomass, with a focus on mass balances, and to evaluate smallholders’ biomass management options and trade-offs. Data collection included household interviews, secondary literature, and reference data sets from global sources. Trade-off analysis focused on household-level self-supply of food, fodder, and fuel by farmers with different sizes of smallholdings, and their potential for on-farm recycling of organic matter. Results indicate that food self-supply by small and medium smallholders is insufficient and fodder sources are scarce. Fodder scarcity means that application of crop byproducts to soils is unlikely. Animal dung is largely used as fuel. Firewood needs exceed on-farm wood production, leading to deforestation. The approach presented facilitates an understanding of current and potential agricultural land interventions in the crop/livestock farming systems prevailing in mountainous areas.http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1biomass managementmass balancetrade-offsmallholdercrop/livestock systemself-sufficiencysoil conservationsustainable land managementTajikistan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Ruppen
Bettina Wolfgramm
Ruth Scheidegger
Hans-Peter Bader
spellingShingle Sebastian Ruppen
Bettina Wolfgramm
Ruth Scheidegger
Hans-Peter Bader
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
Mountain Research and Development
biomass management
mass balance
trade-off
smallholder
crop/livestock system
self-sufficiency
soil conservation
sustainable land management
Tajikistan
author_facet Sebastian Ruppen
Bettina Wolfgramm
Ruth Scheidegger
Hans-Peter Bader
author_sort Sebastian Ruppen
title Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
title_short Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
title_full Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
title_fullStr Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
title_full_unstemmed Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
title_sort method for analyzing trade-offs in biomass management in smallholder farming systems based on mass balance: a case study in tajikistan's foothills
publisher International Mountain Society
series Mountain Research and Development
issn 0276-4741
1994-7151
publishDate 2016-02-01
description In smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and productivity decline, and support more sustainable use of marginal land. Mixed crop/livestock systems are often carefully balanced to minimize risks. Thus, when planning interventions, profound systems knowledge is crucial. However, the data required for system characterization are often scarce, and original field studies are thus necessary. The aim of this research, a case study in Tajikistan, was to improve systems understanding of the biomass cycle in crop/livestock systems in order to quantify the obstacles to the spread of sustainable land management technologies to farming households. It aimed to establish a database and methods of rapid data collection to quantify the stocks and flows of biomass, with a focus on mass balances, and to evaluate smallholders’ biomass management options and trade-offs. Data collection included household interviews, secondary literature, and reference data sets from global sources. Trade-off analysis focused on household-level self-supply of food, fodder, and fuel by farmers with different sizes of smallholdings, and their potential for on-farm recycling of organic matter. Results indicate that food self-supply by small and medium smallholders is insufficient and fodder sources are scarce. Fodder scarcity means that application of crop byproducts to soils is unlikely. Animal dung is largely used as fuel. Firewood needs exceed on-farm wood production, leading to deforestation. The approach presented facilitates an understanding of current and potential agricultural land interventions in the crop/livestock farming systems prevailing in mountainous areas.
topic biomass management
mass balance
trade-off
smallholder
crop/livestock system
self-sufficiency
soil conservation
sustainable land management
Tajikistan
url http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianruppen methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills
AT bettinawolfgramm methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills
AT ruthscheidegger methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills
AT hanspeterbader methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills
_version_ 1725144501350039552