Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills
In smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Mountain Society
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Mountain Research and Development |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1 |
id |
doaj-0573b83562344fed8c184af5c91a0514 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0573b83562344fed8c184af5c91a05142020-11-25T01:17:59ZengInternational Mountain SocietyMountain Research and Development0276-47411994-71512016-02-013618090http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's FoothillsSebastian Ruppen0Bettina Wolfgramm1Ruth Scheidegger2Hans-Peter Bader3University of Bern, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandUniversity of Bern, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; bettina.wolfgramm@cde.unibe.ch; bwolfgramm@gmx.chSwiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandSwiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Department Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Duebendorf, SwitzerlandIn smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and productivity decline, and support more sustainable use of marginal land. Mixed crop/livestock systems are often carefully balanced to minimize risks. Thus, when planning interventions, profound systems knowledge is crucial. However, the data required for system characterization are often scarce, and original field studies are thus necessary. The aim of this research, a case study in Tajikistan, was to improve systems understanding of the biomass cycle in crop/livestock systems in order to quantify the obstacles to the spread of sustainable land management technologies to farming households. It aimed to establish a database and methods of rapid data collection to quantify the stocks and flows of biomass, with a focus on mass balances, and to evaluate smallholders’ biomass management options and trade-offs. Data collection included household interviews, secondary literature, and reference data sets from global sources. Trade-off analysis focused on household-level self-supply of food, fodder, and fuel by farmers with different sizes of smallholdings, and their potential for on-farm recycling of organic matter. Results indicate that food self-supply by small and medium smallholders is insufficient and fodder sources are scarce. Fodder scarcity means that application of crop byproducts to soils is unlikely. Animal dung is largely used as fuel. Firewood needs exceed on-farm wood production, leading to deforestation. The approach presented facilitates an understanding of current and potential agricultural land interventions in the crop/livestock farming systems prevailing in mountainous areas.http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1biomass managementmass balancetrade-offsmallholdercrop/livestock systemself-sufficiencysoil conservationsustainable land managementTajikistan |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Ruppen Bettina Wolfgramm Ruth Scheidegger Hans-Peter Bader |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Ruppen Bettina Wolfgramm Ruth Scheidegger Hans-Peter Bader Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills Mountain Research and Development biomass management mass balance trade-off smallholder crop/livestock system self-sufficiency soil conservation sustainable land management Tajikistan |
author_facet |
Sebastian Ruppen Bettina Wolfgramm Ruth Scheidegger Hans-Peter Bader |
author_sort |
Sebastian Ruppen |
title |
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills |
title_short |
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills |
title_full |
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills |
title_fullStr |
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills |
title_full_unstemmed |
Method for Analyzing Trade-offs in Biomass Management in Smallholder Farming Systems Based on Mass Balance: A Case Study in Tajikistan's Foothills |
title_sort |
method for analyzing trade-offs in biomass management in smallholder farming systems based on mass balance: a case study in tajikistan's foothills |
publisher |
International Mountain Society |
series |
Mountain Research and Development |
issn |
0276-4741 1994-7151 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
In smallholder farming systems, especially in mountainous areas, households face trade-offs between meeting short-term human needs and ensuring long-term soil productivity. Improved biomass management can help break the downward spiral of overexploitation of natural resources, land degradation, and productivity decline, and support more sustainable use of marginal land. Mixed crop/livestock systems are often carefully balanced to minimize risks. Thus, when planning interventions, profound systems knowledge is crucial. However, the data required for system characterization are often scarce, and original field studies are thus necessary. The aim of this research, a case study in Tajikistan, was to improve systems understanding of the biomass cycle in crop/livestock systems in order to quantify the obstacles to the spread of sustainable land management technologies to farming households. It aimed to establish a database and methods of rapid data collection to quantify the stocks and flows of biomass, with a focus on mass balances, and to evaluate smallholders’ biomass management options and trade-offs. Data collection included household interviews, secondary literature, and reference data sets from global sources. Trade-off analysis focused on household-level self-supply of food, fodder, and fuel by farmers with different sizes of smallholdings, and their potential for on-farm recycling of organic matter. Results indicate that food self-supply by small and medium smallholders is insufficient and fodder sources are scarce. Fodder scarcity means that application of crop byproducts to soils is unlikely. Animal dung is largely used as fuel. Firewood needs exceed on-farm wood production, leading to deforestation. The approach presented facilitates an understanding of current and potential agricultural land interventions in the crop/livestock farming systems prevailing in mountainous areas. |
topic |
biomass management mass balance trade-off smallholder crop/livestock system self-sufficiency soil conservation sustainable land management Tajikistan |
url |
http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00114.1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastianruppen methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills AT bettinawolfgramm methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills AT ruthscheidegger methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills AT hanspeterbader methodforanalyzingtradeoffsinbiomassmanagementinsmallholderfarmingsystemsbasedonmassbalanceacasestudyintajikistansfoothills |
_version_ |
1725144501350039552 |