The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach

Much research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only, conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and region...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Suzie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2016-10-01
Series:Open Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INT
id doaj-05545e14b0704f0fa3cb92dac58ae116
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05545e14b0704f0fa3cb92dac58ae1162021-10-02T11:14:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602016-10-012110.1515/opar-2016-0010opar-2016-0010The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational ApproachThomas Suzie0Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI00014, Uusimaa, FinlandMuch research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only, conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and regions, with only limited reference to metal detecting activities elsewhere. This has meant that the transnational aspects of metal detecting – such as the international trade of metal-detected objects, and transnational movement of metal detectorists themselves (for example through touristic activities) – has mostly been overlooked or merely speculated upon. Much debate has revolved around assumptions, stymied by perceived ethical barriers and accepted attitudes which limit deeper engagement with the metal detecting community. Approaching the study of hobbyist metal detecting at a trans-European level would encourage greater understanding of the scale of hobbyist metal detecting and the world views, activities and contact and trade networks of metal detectorists. This may challenge traditionally-held perspectives concerning what should be valued as cultural heritage and who is entitled to make use of it. In this paper I set out our current state of knowledge, and propose directions for future research.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INTMetal detecting transnational research archaeology Europe worldviews
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Suzie
spellingShingle Thomas Suzie
The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
Open Archaeology
Metal detecting
transnational research
archaeology
Europe
worldviews
author_facet Thomas Suzie
author_sort Thomas Suzie
title The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
title_short The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
title_full The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
title_fullStr The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
title_sort future of studying hobbyist metal detecting in europe: a call for a transnational approach
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Archaeology
issn 2300-6560
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Much research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only, conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and regions, with only limited reference to metal detecting activities elsewhere. This has meant that the transnational aspects of metal detecting – such as the international trade of metal-detected objects, and transnational movement of metal detectorists themselves (for example through touristic activities) – has mostly been overlooked or merely speculated upon. Much debate has revolved around assumptions, stymied by perceived ethical barriers and accepted attitudes which limit deeper engagement with the metal detecting community. Approaching the study of hobbyist metal detecting at a trans-European level would encourage greater understanding of the scale of hobbyist metal detecting and the world views, activities and contact and trade networks of metal detectorists. This may challenge traditionally-held perspectives concerning what should be valued as cultural heritage and who is entitled to make use of it. In this paper I set out our current state of knowledge, and propose directions for future research.
topic Metal detecting
transnational research
archaeology
Europe
worldviews
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT thomassuzie thefutureofstudyinghobbyistmetaldetectingineuropeacallforatransnationalapproach
AT thomassuzie futureofstudyinghobbyistmetaldetectingineuropeacallforatransnationalapproach
_version_ 1716856282568196096