The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach
Much research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only, conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and region...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Open Archaeology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-05545e14b0704f0fa3cb92dac58ae116 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-05545e14b0704f0fa3cb92dac58ae1162021-10-02T11:14:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602016-10-012110.1515/opar-2016-0010opar-2016-0010The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational ApproachThomas Suzie0Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI00014, Uusimaa, FinlandMuch research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only, conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and regions, with only limited reference to metal detecting activities elsewhere. This has meant that the transnational aspects of metal detecting – such as the international trade of metal-detected objects, and transnational movement of metal detectorists themselves (for example through touristic activities) – has mostly been overlooked or merely speculated upon. Much debate has revolved around assumptions, stymied by perceived ethical barriers and accepted attitudes which limit deeper engagement with the metal detecting community. Approaching the study of hobbyist metal detecting at a trans-European level would encourage greater understanding of the scale of hobbyist metal detecting and the world views, activities and contact and trade networks of metal detectorists. This may challenge traditionally-held perspectives concerning what should be valued as cultural heritage and who is entitled to make use of it. In this paper I set out our current state of knowledge, and propose directions for future research.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INTMetal detecting transnational research archaeology Europe worldviews |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Suzie |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Suzie The Future of Studying Hobbyist Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for a Transnational Approach Open Archaeology Metal detecting transnational research archaeology Europe worldviews |
author_facet |
Thomas Suzie |
author_sort |
Thomas Suzie |
title |
The Future of Studying Hobbyist
Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for
a Transnational Approach |
title_short |
The Future of Studying Hobbyist
Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for
a Transnational Approach |
title_full |
The Future of Studying Hobbyist
Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for
a Transnational Approach |
title_fullStr |
The Future of Studying Hobbyist
Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for
a Transnational Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Future of Studying Hobbyist
Metal Detecting in Europe: A Call for
a Transnational Approach |
title_sort |
future of studying hobbyist
metal detecting in europe: a call for
a transnational approach |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Archaeology |
issn |
2300-6560 |
publishDate |
2016-10-01 |
description |
Much research on hobbyist metal detecting has either focused on the archaeological impact only,
conflated hobbyism with criminal activity (namely looting and illicit trade), or generalized the motivations
and drivers for metal detectorists. Studies to date have targeted specific countries and regions, with only
limited reference to metal detecting activities elsewhere. This has meant that the transnational aspects of
metal detecting – such as the international trade of metal-detected objects, and transnational movement of
metal detectorists themselves (for example through touristic activities) – has mostly been overlooked or merely
speculated upon. Much debate has revolved around assumptions, stymied by perceived ethical barriers and
accepted attitudes which limit deeper engagement with the metal detecting community. Approaching the
study of hobbyist metal detecting at a trans-European level would encourage greater understanding of the
scale of hobbyist metal detecting and the world views, activities and contact and trade networks of metal
detectorists. This may challenge traditionally-held perspectives concerning what should be valued as cultural
heritage and who is entitled to make use of it. In this paper I set out our current state of knowledge, and
propose directions for future research. |
topic |
Metal detecting transnational research archaeology Europe worldviews |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0010/opar-2016-0010.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomassuzie thefutureofstudyinghobbyistmetaldetectingineuropeacallforatransnationalapproach AT thomassuzie futureofstudyinghobbyistmetaldetectingineuropeacallforatransnationalapproach |
_version_ |
1716856282568196096 |