Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p>...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Infectious Diseases |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151 |
id |
doaj-0548d80d94b74db18d182a5e18014f03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0548d80d94b74db18d182a5e18014f032020-11-25T03:37:34ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342006-10-016115110.1186/1471-2334-6-151Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)Leong HoeEarnest ArulChow Angela LPChen Mark ICLeo Yee<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used epidemiological and clinical data on probable SARS patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Using a case-control approach, index patients who had probable SARS who subsequently transmitted the disease to at least one other patient were analysed as "cases" against patients with no transmission as "controls", using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>98 index patients were available for analysis (22 with transmission, 76 with no transmission). Covariates positively associated with transmission in univariate analysis at p < 0.05 included delay to isolation (Day 7 of illness or later), admission to a non-isolation facility, pre-existing chronic respiratory disease and immunosuppressive disease, need for oxygen, shortness of breath, vomiting, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels and higher neutrophil counts. In the multivariate analysis, only three factors were significant: delay to isolation, admission to a non-isolation facility and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels of >650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leong Hoe Earnest Arul Chow Angela LP Chen Mark IC Leo Yee |
spellingShingle |
Leong Hoe Earnest Arul Chow Angela LP Chen Mark IC Leo Yee Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) BMC Infectious Diseases |
author_facet |
Leong Hoe Earnest Arul Chow Angela LP Chen Mark IC Leo Yee |
author_sort |
Leong Hoe |
title |
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
title_short |
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
title_full |
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
title_fullStr |
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
title_sort |
clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in severe acute respiratory syndrome (sars) |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1471-2334 |
publishDate |
2006-10-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used epidemiological and clinical data on probable SARS patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Using a case-control approach, index patients who had probable SARS who subsequently transmitted the disease to at least one other patient were analysed as "cases" against patients with no transmission as "controls", using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>98 index patients were available for analysis (22 with transmission, 76 with no transmission). Covariates positively associated with transmission in univariate analysis at p < 0.05 included delay to isolation (Day 7 of illness or later), admission to a non-isolation facility, pre-existing chronic respiratory disease and immunosuppressive disease, need for oxygen, shortness of breath, vomiting, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels and higher neutrophil counts. In the multivariate analysis, only three factors were significant: delay to isolation, admission to a non-isolation facility and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels of >650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leonghoe clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars AT earnestarul clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars AT chowangelalp clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars AT chenmarkic clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars AT leoyee clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars |
_version_ |
1724545300466499584 |