Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leong Hoe, Earnest Arul, Chow Angela LP, Chen Mark IC, Leo Yee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-10-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151
id doaj-0548d80d94b74db18d182a5e18014f03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0548d80d94b74db18d182a5e18014f032020-11-25T03:37:34ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342006-10-016115110.1186/1471-2334-6-151Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)Leong HoeEarnest ArulChow Angela LPChen Mark ICLeo Yee<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used epidemiological and clinical data on probable SARS patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Using a case-control approach, index patients who had probable SARS who subsequently transmitted the disease to at least one other patient were analysed as "cases" against patients with no transmission as "controls", using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>98 index patients were available for analysis (22 with transmission, 76 with no transmission). Covariates positively associated with transmission in univariate analysis at p < 0.05 included delay to isolation (Day 7 of illness or later), admission to a non-isolation facility, pre-existing chronic respiratory disease and immunosuppressive disease, need for oxygen, shortness of breath, vomiting, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels and higher neutrophil counts. In the multivariate analysis, only three factors were significant: delay to isolation, admission to a non-isolation facility and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels of >650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leong Hoe
Earnest Arul
Chow Angela LP
Chen Mark IC
Leo Yee
spellingShingle Leong Hoe
Earnest Arul
Chow Angela LP
Chen Mark IC
Leo Yee
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
BMC Infectious Diseases
author_facet Leong Hoe
Earnest Arul
Chow Angela LP
Chen Mark IC
Leo Yee
author_sort Leong Hoe
title Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
title_short Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
title_full Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
title_fullStr Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
title_sort clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in severe acute respiratory syndrome (sars)
publisher BMC
series BMC Infectious Diseases
issn 1471-2334
publishDate 2006-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Only a minority of probable SARS cases caused transmission. We assess if any epidemiological or clinical factors in SARS index patients were associated with increased probability of transmission.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used epidemiological and clinical data on probable SARS patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Using a case-control approach, index patients who had probable SARS who subsequently transmitted the disease to at least one other patient were analysed as "cases" against patients with no transmission as "controls", using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>98 index patients were available for analysis (22 with transmission, 76 with no transmission). Covariates positively associated with transmission in univariate analysis at p < 0.05 included delay to isolation (Day 7 of illness or later), admission to a non-isolation facility, pre-existing chronic respiratory disease and immunosuppressive disease, need for oxygen, shortness of breath, vomiting, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels and higher neutrophil counts. In the multivariate analysis, only three factors were significant: delay to isolation, admission to a non-isolation facility and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels of >650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/151
work_keys_str_mv AT leonghoe clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars
AT earnestarul clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars
AT chowangelalp clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars
AT chenmarkic clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars
AT leoyee clinicalandepidemiologicalpredictorsoftransmissioninsevereacuterespiratorysyndromesars
_version_ 1724545300466499584