Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions

In the context of data modeling and comparisons between different fit models, Bayesian analysis calls that model best which has the largest evidence, the prior-weighted integral over model parameters of the likelihood function. Evidence calculations automatically take into account both the usual chi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eggers Hans C., de Kock Michiel B., Trainor Thomas A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201612001006
id doaj-053c268f40464d998594cad28df90900
record_format Article
spelling doaj-053c268f40464d998594cad28df909002021-08-02T08:47:28ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2016-01-011200100610.1051/epjconf/201612001006epjconf_ismd2016_01006Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisionsEggers Hans C.de Kock Michiel B.0Trainor Thomas A.1Department of Physics, Stellenbosch UniversityCENPA 354290, University of WashingtonIn the context of data modeling and comparisons between different fit models, Bayesian analysis calls that model best which has the largest evidence, the prior-weighted integral over model parameters of the likelihood function. Evidence calculations automatically take into account both the usual chi-squared measure and an Occam factor which quantifies the price for adding extra parameters. Applying Bayesian analysis to projections onto azimuth of 2D angular correlations from 200 GeV AuAu collisions, we consider typical model choices including Fourier series and a Gaussian plus combinations of individual cosine components. We find that models including a Gaussian component are consistently preferred over pure Fourier-series parametrizations, sometimes strongly so. For 0–5% central collisions the Gaussian-plus-dipole model performs better than Fourier Series models or any other combination of Gaussian-plus-multipoles.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201612001006
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eggers Hans C.
de Kock Michiel B.
Trainor Thomas A.
spellingShingle Eggers Hans C.
de Kock Michiel B.
Trainor Thomas A.
Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Eggers Hans C.
de Kock Michiel B.
Trainor Thomas A.
author_sort Eggers Hans C.
title Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
title_short Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
title_full Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
title_fullStr Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200GeV AuAu collisions
title_sort bayesian model comparison for one-dimensional azimuthal correlations in 200gev auau collisions
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description In the context of data modeling and comparisons between different fit models, Bayesian analysis calls that model best which has the largest evidence, the prior-weighted integral over model parameters of the likelihood function. Evidence calculations automatically take into account both the usual chi-squared measure and an Occam factor which quantifies the price for adding extra parameters. Applying Bayesian analysis to projections onto azimuth of 2D angular correlations from 200 GeV AuAu collisions, we consider typical model choices including Fourier series and a Gaussian plus combinations of individual cosine components. We find that models including a Gaussian component are consistently preferred over pure Fourier-series parametrizations, sometimes strongly so. For 0–5% central collisions the Gaussian-plus-dipole model performs better than Fourier Series models or any other combination of Gaussian-plus-multipoles.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201612001006
work_keys_str_mv AT eggershansc bayesianmodelcomparisonforonedimensionalazimuthalcorrelationsin200gevauaucollisions
AT dekockmichielb bayesianmodelcomparisonforonedimensionalazimuthalcorrelationsin200gevauaucollisions
AT trainorthomasa bayesianmodelcomparisonforonedimensionalazimuthalcorrelationsin200gevauaucollisions
_version_ 1721237141500985344