Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics

Abstract Removing influential nodes or shortcuts in a network restrains epidemic or information diffusion, but this method destroys the connectivity of the network and changes the topological structure. As an alternative, an additional field can be imposed in the network to affect node behaviors and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fei Xiong, Zhao-Yi Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06171-6
id doaj-0530705429bf434cae7c5413d80a305a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0530705429bf434cae7c5413d80a305a2020-12-08T02:22:27ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-07-017111410.1038/s41598-017-06171-6Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic DynamicsFei Xiong0Zhao-Yi Li1School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong UniversitySchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong UniversityAbstract Removing influential nodes or shortcuts in a network restrains epidemic or information diffusion, but this method destroys the connectivity of the network and changes the topological structure. As an alternative, an additional field can be imposed in the network to affect node behaviors and slow down diffusion dynamics. However, little research has been performed systematically to analyze and compare these methods. This paper investigates epidemic dynamics and proposes the following four methods to restrain the diffusion process: blocking nodes, blocking edges, distracting node attention, and propagating opposite information. We compare differences in the actions of these methods, and investigate their joint effects. Through numerical experiments in a scale-free network and a real network, we observe that these methods change the spreading threshold and final extent with different conditions. The method of blocking nodes is more efficient and economical than blocking edges. Propagating opposite information can effectively prevent diffusion of target information that has a large spreading rate, whereas distracting node attention only takes effect for the information with a small rate. Meanwhile, the effects of these two methods mainly depend on their action time. From the joint effects, we can select the optimal method for different situations.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06171-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fei Xiong
Zhao-Yi Li
spellingShingle Fei Xiong
Zhao-Yi Li
Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
Scientific Reports
author_facet Fei Xiong
Zhao-Yi Li
author_sort Fei Xiong
title Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
title_short Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
title_full Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
title_fullStr Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Effective Methods of Restraining Diffusion in Terms of Epidemic Dynamics
title_sort effective methods of restraining diffusion in terms of epidemic dynamics
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Removing influential nodes or shortcuts in a network restrains epidemic or information diffusion, but this method destroys the connectivity of the network and changes the topological structure. As an alternative, an additional field can be imposed in the network to affect node behaviors and slow down diffusion dynamics. However, little research has been performed systematically to analyze and compare these methods. This paper investigates epidemic dynamics and proposes the following four methods to restrain the diffusion process: blocking nodes, blocking edges, distracting node attention, and propagating opposite information. We compare differences in the actions of these methods, and investigate their joint effects. Through numerical experiments in a scale-free network and a real network, we observe that these methods change the spreading threshold and final extent with different conditions. The method of blocking nodes is more efficient and economical than blocking edges. Propagating opposite information can effectively prevent diffusion of target information that has a large spreading rate, whereas distracting node attention only takes effect for the information with a small rate. Meanwhile, the effects of these two methods mainly depend on their action time. From the joint effects, we can select the optimal method for different situations.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06171-6
work_keys_str_mv AT feixiong effectivemethodsofrestrainingdiffusionintermsofepidemicdynamics
AT zhaoyili effectivemethodsofrestrainingdiffusionintermsofepidemicdynamics
_version_ 1724393798574800896