Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693 |
id |
doaj-050a211755e94d1bb500f413586ef3c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-050a211755e94d1bb500f413586ef3c12020-11-25T03:52:56ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Oncology1179-55492020-08-011410.1177/1179554920946693Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?Emanuela Dell’Aquila0Tea Zeppola1Marco Stellato2Francesco Pantano3Mario Scartozzi4Cristina Madaudo5Filippo Pietrantonio6Chiara Cremolini7Giuseppe Aprile8Bruno Vincenzi9Roberto Moretto10Marco Puzzoni11Silvio Ken Garattini12Riccardo Lobefaro13Giuseppe Tonini14Daniele Santini15Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ItalyUnit of Medical Oncology 2, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyUnit of Medical Oncology 2, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, ItalyMedical Oncology, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, ItalyMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyBackground: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment–related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line.https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emanuela Dell’Aquila Tea Zeppola Marco Stellato Francesco Pantano Mario Scartozzi Cristina Madaudo Filippo Pietrantonio Chiara Cremolini Giuseppe Aprile Bruno Vincenzi Roberto Moretto Marco Puzzoni Silvio Ken Garattini Riccardo Lobefaro Giuseppe Tonini Daniele Santini |
spellingShingle |
Emanuela Dell’Aquila Tea Zeppola Marco Stellato Francesco Pantano Mario Scartozzi Cristina Madaudo Filippo Pietrantonio Chiara Cremolini Giuseppe Aprile Bruno Vincenzi Roberto Moretto Marco Puzzoni Silvio Ken Garattini Riccardo Lobefaro Giuseppe Tonini Daniele Santini Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology |
author_facet |
Emanuela Dell’Aquila Tea Zeppola Marco Stellato Francesco Pantano Mario Scartozzi Cristina Madaudo Filippo Pietrantonio Chiara Cremolini Giuseppe Aprile Bruno Vincenzi Roberto Moretto Marco Puzzoni Silvio Ken Garattini Riccardo Lobefaro Giuseppe Tonini Daniele Santini |
author_sort |
Emanuela Dell’Aquila |
title |
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? |
title_short |
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? |
title_full |
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? |
title_fullStr |
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality? |
title_sort |
anti-egfr therapy in metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma: myth or reality? |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology |
issn |
1179-5549 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment–related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emanueladellaquila antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT teazeppola antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT marcostellato antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT francescopantano antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT marioscartozzi antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT cristinamadaudo antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT filippopietrantonio antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT chiaracremolini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT giuseppeaprile antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT brunovincenzi antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT robertomoretto antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT marcopuzzoni antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT silviokengarattini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT riccardolobefaro antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT giuseppetonini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality AT danielesantini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality |
_version_ |
1724480029360914432 |