Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?

Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuela Dell’Aquila, Tea Zeppola, Marco Stellato, Francesco Pantano, Mario Scartozzi, Cristina Madaudo, Filippo Pietrantonio, Chiara Cremolini, Giuseppe Aprile, Bruno Vincenzi, Roberto Moretto, Marco Puzzoni, Silvio Ken Garattini, Riccardo Lobefaro, Giuseppe Tonini, Daniele Santini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-08-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693
id doaj-050a211755e94d1bb500f413586ef3c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-050a211755e94d1bb500f413586ef3c12020-11-25T03:52:56ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Oncology1179-55492020-08-011410.1177/1179554920946693Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?Emanuela Dell’Aquila0Tea Zeppola1Marco Stellato2Francesco Pantano3Mario Scartozzi4Cristina Madaudo5Filippo Pietrantonio6Chiara Cremolini7Giuseppe Aprile8Bruno Vincenzi9Roberto Moretto10Marco Puzzoni11Silvio Ken Garattini12Riccardo Lobefaro13Giuseppe Tonini14Daniele Santini15Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ItalyUnit of Medical Oncology 2, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyUnit of Medical Oncology 2, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, ItalyMedical Oncology, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, ItalyMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, ItalyBackground: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment–related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line.https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emanuela Dell’Aquila
Tea Zeppola
Marco Stellato
Francesco Pantano
Mario Scartozzi
Cristina Madaudo
Filippo Pietrantonio
Chiara Cremolini
Giuseppe Aprile
Bruno Vincenzi
Roberto Moretto
Marco Puzzoni
Silvio Ken Garattini
Riccardo Lobefaro
Giuseppe Tonini
Daniele Santini
spellingShingle Emanuela Dell’Aquila
Tea Zeppola
Marco Stellato
Francesco Pantano
Mario Scartozzi
Cristina Madaudo
Filippo Pietrantonio
Chiara Cremolini
Giuseppe Aprile
Bruno Vincenzi
Roberto Moretto
Marco Puzzoni
Silvio Ken Garattini
Riccardo Lobefaro
Giuseppe Tonini
Daniele Santini
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
author_facet Emanuela Dell’Aquila
Tea Zeppola
Marco Stellato
Francesco Pantano
Mario Scartozzi
Cristina Madaudo
Filippo Pietrantonio
Chiara Cremolini
Giuseppe Aprile
Bruno Vincenzi
Roberto Moretto
Marco Puzzoni
Silvio Ken Garattini
Riccardo Lobefaro
Giuseppe Tonini
Daniele Santini
author_sort Emanuela Dell’Aquila
title Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
title_short Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
title_full Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
title_fullStr Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
title_full_unstemmed Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
title_sort anti-egfr therapy in metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma: myth or reality?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
issn 1179-5549
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment–related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1179554920946693
work_keys_str_mv AT emanueladellaquila antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT teazeppola antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT marcostellato antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT francescopantano antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT marioscartozzi antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT cristinamadaudo antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT filippopietrantonio antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT chiaracremolini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT giuseppeaprile antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT brunovincenzi antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT robertomoretto antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT marcopuzzoni antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT silviokengarattini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT riccardolobefaro antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT giuseppetonini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
AT danielesantini antiegfrtherapyinmetastaticsmallboweladenocarcinomamythorreality
_version_ 1724480029360914432