Gender differences in social networks
This paper examines gender differences in different types of social networks. One of the main concepts relevant for studying gender differences is homophily, which refers to the tendency of people to interact more with similar individuals. In this paper homophily is analysed within the structural pe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Serbian Sociological Association, Belgrade
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Sociološki Pregled |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2014/0085-63201402229K.pdf |
id |
doaj-04d3908b4b9647de9ffc3bf338f5c678 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-04d3908b4b9647de9ffc3bf338f5c6782021-04-02T15:52:55ZengSerbian Sociological Association, BelgradeSociološki Pregled0085-63202560-48802014-01-0148222924010.5937/socpreg1402229K0085-63201402229KGender differences in social networksKomaromi Bojana0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Novi Sad, SerbiaThis paper examines gender differences in different types of social networks. One of the main concepts relevant for studying gender differences is homophily, which refers to the tendency of people to interact more with similar individuals. In this paper homophily is analysed within the structural perspective which explains that the structures of our networks depend primarily on opportunities for social interactions, i.e. the composition and dynamics of the social context in which these interactions are embedded. Homophily is evident among males and females as early as in childhood, only to be even more prominent in school and adult years. Sex segregation is probably the most evident in the organisational context, where it has detrimental effects on women's careers, as women are generally underrepresented in positions of power and authority. Research in the last two decades pointed to the facts: 1) that men and women have very different types of organisational networks, 2) that successful men and women adopt different strategies to reach similar career objectives and acquire similar resources, and 3) that organisations also need to be actively involved in solving these gender-related issues.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2014/0085-63201402229K.pdfsocial network analysisgender differenceshomophilysex segregationstrong and weak ties |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Komaromi Bojana |
spellingShingle |
Komaromi Bojana Gender differences in social networks Sociološki Pregled social network analysis gender differences homophily sex segregation strong and weak ties |
author_facet |
Komaromi Bojana |
author_sort |
Komaromi Bojana |
title |
Gender differences in social networks |
title_short |
Gender differences in social networks |
title_full |
Gender differences in social networks |
title_fullStr |
Gender differences in social networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender differences in social networks |
title_sort |
gender differences in social networks |
publisher |
Serbian Sociological Association, Belgrade |
series |
Sociološki Pregled |
issn |
0085-6320 2560-4880 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
This paper examines gender differences in different types of social networks. One of the main concepts relevant for studying gender differences is homophily, which refers to the tendency of people to interact more with similar individuals. In this paper homophily is analysed within the structural perspective which explains that the structures of our networks depend primarily on opportunities for social interactions, i.e. the composition and dynamics of the social context in which these interactions are embedded. Homophily is evident among males and females as early as in childhood, only to be even more prominent in school and adult years. Sex segregation is probably the most evident in the organisational context, where it has detrimental effects on women's careers, as women are generally underrepresented in positions of power and authority. Research in the last two decades pointed to the facts: 1) that men and women have very different types of organisational networks, 2) that successful men and women adopt different strategies to reach similar career objectives and acquire similar resources, and 3) that organisations also need to be actively involved in solving these gender-related issues. |
topic |
social network analysis gender differences homophily sex segregation strong and weak ties |
url |
http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2014/0085-63201402229K.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT komaromibojana genderdifferencesinsocialnetworks |
_version_ |
1721558663090405376 |