M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?

Introduction. The introduction identifies one of the most important problems in the political history of Russia – the problem of determining and choosing the path of the long-term civilizational development in the aspect of liberal and conservative paradigm. Methods and materials. As the main met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oleg V. Kuznetsov, Konstantin A. Lotarev, Vasiliy V. Tarakanov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2019-10-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2044
id doaj-04bdca6d76fb430f99a90e9d0d09dfcc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04bdca6d76fb430f99a90e9d0d09dfcc2020-11-25T02:39:35ZrusVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ1998-99382312-87042019-10-01245869910.15688/jvolsu4.2019.5.6M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?Oleg V. Kuznetsov0Konstantin A. Lotarev1Vasiliy V. Tarakanov2Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian FederationDepartment of International Relations, Political Science and Area Studies, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian FederationVolgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian FederationIntroduction. The introduction identifies one of the most important problems in the political history of Russia – the problem of determining and choosing the path of the long-term civilizational development in the aspect of liberal and conservative paradigm. Methods and materials. As the main methods the authors apply: the historical-comparative, systemic, typological and historical-political ones. The main sources are the following: ”Plan of State Transformation” by M.M. Speransky and “Note on Ancient and New Russia in Its Political and Civil Relations” by N.M. Karamzin. Analysis. In the course of the comparative analysis the authors carry out the study of the plan of M.M. Speransky’s state reforms and N.M. Karamzin’s political program in the aspect of the liberal and conservative axiology. The authors conclude that there were two different models of civilizational development of the state. One of them, represented by M.M. Speransky, suggested radical changes in the political system, legislation, social relations and led Russia to the liberal Western path of development. N.M. Karamzin proceeded from the priority of national and state traditions and the perniciousness of transferring European political institutions, customs and practicies to the Russian soil. Results. The result of the study is the conclusion that in the complete absence of a basis for the formation of liberalism in Russia, M.M. Speransky’s constitutional search was doomed to failure and resulted in the practice of building a system of the rational public administration within the framework of absolutism. Centuries-old historical traditions of Russia were much stronger than the desire of Alexander I to give the country a Constitution.https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2044history of russia of the 19th centuryautocracyreformpolitical thoughtliberalismconservatismtraditionalism
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleg V. Kuznetsov
Konstantin A. Lotarev
Vasiliy V. Tarakanov
spellingShingle Oleg V. Kuznetsov
Konstantin A. Lotarev
Vasiliy V. Tarakanov
M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
history of russia of the 19th century
autocracy
reform
political thought
liberalism
conservatism
traditionalism
author_facet Oleg V. Kuznetsov
Konstantin A. Lotarev
Vasiliy V. Tarakanov
author_sort Oleg V. Kuznetsov
title M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
title_short M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
title_full M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
title_fullStr M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
title_full_unstemmed M.M. Speransky and N.M. Karamzin: Two Ways of Civilized Development of Russia or a Dispute About a Rational System of Public Administration?
title_sort m.m. speransky and n.m. karamzin: two ways of civilized development of russia or a dispute about a rational system of public administration?
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
issn 1998-9938
2312-8704
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Introduction. The introduction identifies one of the most important problems in the political history of Russia – the problem of determining and choosing the path of the long-term civilizational development in the aspect of liberal and conservative paradigm. Methods and materials. As the main methods the authors apply: the historical-comparative, systemic, typological and historical-political ones. The main sources are the following: ”Plan of State Transformation” by M.M. Speransky and “Note on Ancient and New Russia in Its Political and Civil Relations” by N.M. Karamzin. Analysis. In the course of the comparative analysis the authors carry out the study of the plan of M.M. Speransky’s state reforms and N.M. Karamzin’s political program in the aspect of the liberal and conservative axiology. The authors conclude that there were two different models of civilizational development of the state. One of them, represented by M.M. Speransky, suggested radical changes in the political system, legislation, social relations and led Russia to the liberal Western path of development. N.M. Karamzin proceeded from the priority of national and state traditions and the perniciousness of transferring European political institutions, customs and practicies to the Russian soil. Results. The result of the study is the conclusion that in the complete absence of a basis for the formation of liberalism in Russia, M.M. Speransky’s constitutional search was doomed to failure and resulted in the practice of building a system of the rational public administration within the framework of absolutism. Centuries-old historical traditions of Russia were much stronger than the desire of Alexander I to give the country a Constitution.
topic history of russia of the 19th century
autocracy
reform
political thought
liberalism
conservatism
traditionalism
url https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2044
work_keys_str_mv AT olegvkuznetsov mmsperanskyandnmkaramzintwowaysofcivilizeddevelopmentofrussiaoradisputeaboutarationalsystemofpublicadministration
AT konstantinalotarev mmsperanskyandnmkaramzintwowaysofcivilizeddevelopmentofrussiaoradisputeaboutarationalsystemofpublicadministration
AT vasiliyvtarakanov mmsperanskyandnmkaramzintwowaysofcivilizeddevelopmentofrussiaoradisputeaboutarationalsystemofpublicadministration
_version_ 1724785171950993408