The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy

Combining work from the related but distinct fields of sociology of knowledge and sociology of education, we explore the effects of the changing landscape of higher education on the academic knowledge production system. Drawing on 100 interviews with faculty members from 34 disciplines at an elite p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brandy Simula, Tracy Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/64
id doaj-04aac8a60d8942119c1ca4e3723a4fff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04aac8a60d8942119c1ca4e3723a4fff2020-11-25T03:05:17ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-04-019646410.3390/socsci9050064The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern AcademyBrandy Simula0Tracy Scott1Department of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USADepartment of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USACombining work from the related but distinct fields of sociology of knowledge and sociology of education, we explore the effects of the changing landscape of higher education on the academic knowledge production system. Drawing on 100 interviews with faculty members from 34 disciplines at an elite private research university, we show that faculty members perceive exponentially increasing pressures to produce, and identify the ways that those pressures can negatively impact the knowledge creation process. We then examine the ways those pressures to produce influence how faculty evaluate their colleagues’ work, leading faculty to extend the benefit of the doubt, rely on reputation, and emphasize the peer review process, even as they simultaneously critique its weaknesses. Finally, we show that faculty members ultimately reconcile their perceptions of weaknesses in the current knowledge production system with their belief in that system by emphasizing their own and their colleagues’ commitment to resisting structural pressures to produce. While much of the existing body of scholarship on the changing higher education landscape has focused on teaching and learning outcomes, this study contributes to our understanding of how those changes impact the research process, underscoring the relationship between institutional structures and evaluative processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/64sociology of knowledgeevaluationhigher educationfacultyresearch process
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brandy Simula
Tracy Scott
spellingShingle Brandy Simula
Tracy Scott
The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
Social Sciences
sociology of knowledge
evaluation
higher education
faculty
research process
author_facet Brandy Simula
Tracy Scott
author_sort Brandy Simula
title The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
title_short The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
title_full The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
title_fullStr The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy
title_sort impact of pressures to produce on knowledge production and evaluation in the modern academy
publisher MDPI AG
series Social Sciences
issn 2076-0760
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Combining work from the related but distinct fields of sociology of knowledge and sociology of education, we explore the effects of the changing landscape of higher education on the academic knowledge production system. Drawing on 100 interviews with faculty members from 34 disciplines at an elite private research university, we show that faculty members perceive exponentially increasing pressures to produce, and identify the ways that those pressures can negatively impact the knowledge creation process. We then examine the ways those pressures to produce influence how faculty evaluate their colleagues’ work, leading faculty to extend the benefit of the doubt, rely on reputation, and emphasize the peer review process, even as they simultaneously critique its weaknesses. Finally, we show that faculty members ultimately reconcile their perceptions of weaknesses in the current knowledge production system with their belief in that system by emphasizing their own and their colleagues’ commitment to resisting structural pressures to produce. While much of the existing body of scholarship on the changing higher education landscape has focused on teaching and learning outcomes, this study contributes to our understanding of how those changes impact the research process, underscoring the relationship between institutional structures and evaluative processes.
topic sociology of knowledge
evaluation
higher education
faculty
research process
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/64
work_keys_str_mv AT brandysimula theimpactofpressurestoproduceonknowledgeproductionandevaluationinthemodernacademy
AT tracyscott theimpactofpressurestoproduceonknowledgeproductionandevaluationinthemodernacademy
AT brandysimula impactofpressurestoproduceonknowledgeproductionandevaluationinthemodernacademy
AT tracyscott impactofpressurestoproduceonknowledgeproductionandevaluationinthemodernacademy
_version_ 1724679443169935360