Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information

<b>Background</b>: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyriaki Kalimeri, Mariano G. Beiró, Andrea Bonanomi, Alessandro Rosina, Ciro Cattuto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2020-01-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/
id doaj-04a392bb676d4a89b0b8cace23431a21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04a392bb676d4a89b0b8cace23431a212020-11-25T03:50:08ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712020-01-0142510.4054/DemRes.2020.42.53765Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric informationKyriaki Kalimeri0Mariano G. Beiró1Andrea Bonanomi2Alessandro Rosina3Ciro Cattuto4ISI FoundationUniversidad de Buenos AiresUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreISI Foundation<b>Background</b>: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys. <b>Objective</b>: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes. <b>Methods</b>: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered. <b>Results</b>: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform's intrinsic social character. <b>Conclusions</b>: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration. <b>Contribution</b>: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/biasdemographyfacebookmoral foundationspersonalitypsychometricsrecruitment biasself-reporting biasself-selection biassocial mediasurvey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyriaki Kalimeri
Mariano G. Beiró
Andrea Bonanomi
Alessandro Rosina
Ciro Cattuto
spellingShingle Kyriaki Kalimeri
Mariano G. Beiró
Andrea Bonanomi
Alessandro Rosina
Ciro Cattuto
Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
Demographic Research
bias
demography
facebook
moral foundations
personality
psychometrics
recruitment bias
self-reporting bias
self-selection bias
social media
survey
author_facet Kyriaki Kalimeri
Mariano G. Beiró
Andrea Bonanomi
Alessandro Rosina
Ciro Cattuto
author_sort Kyriaki Kalimeri
title Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_short Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_full Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_fullStr Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_full_unstemmed Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_sort traditional versus facebook-based surveys: evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
series Demographic Research
issn 1435-9871
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <b>Background</b>: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys. <b>Objective</b>: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes. <b>Methods</b>: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered. <b>Results</b>: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform's intrinsic social character. <b>Conclusions</b>: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration. <b>Contribution</b>: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.
topic bias
demography
facebook
moral foundations
personality
psychometrics
recruitment bias
self-reporting bias
self-selection bias
social media
survey
url https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/
work_keys_str_mv AT kyriakikalimeri traditionalversusfacebookbasedsurveysevaluationofbiasesinselfreporteddemographicandpsychometricinformation
AT marianogbeiro traditionalversusfacebookbasedsurveysevaluationofbiasesinselfreporteddemographicandpsychometricinformation
AT andreabonanomi traditionalversusfacebookbasedsurveysevaluationofbiasesinselfreporteddemographicandpsychometricinformation
AT alessandrorosina traditionalversusfacebookbasedsurveysevaluationofbiasesinselfreporteddemographicandpsychometricinformation
AT cirocattuto traditionalversusfacebookbasedsurveysevaluationofbiasesinselfreporteddemographicandpsychometricinformation
_version_ 1724492145617797120