Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents

Aims: To compare vital parameters; operator’s comfort; and patient’s satisfaction during impacted third molar removal under local anaesthesia, with or without sedative agents. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients undergoing elective third molar surgery were randomly divided into three groups o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jigar M Dhuvad, Rajesh A Kshisagar, Mukesh M Dhuvad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5332/11043_CE(Ra)_F(Sh)_PF1(SNAK)_PFA(AK).pdf
id doaj-049fb2ed10b84c619008c9d81027e8d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-049fb2ed10b84c619008c9d81027e8d52020-11-25T03:42:27ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-12-01812ZC57ZC6010.7860/JCDR/2014/11043.5332Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative AgentsJigar M Dhuvad0Rajesh A Kshisagar1Mukesh M Dhuvad2Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmadabad, India.Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.Private Practiceoner, Ahmadabad, India.Aims: To compare vital parameters; operator’s comfort; and patient’s satisfaction during impacted third molar removal under local anaesthesia, with or without sedative agents. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients undergoing elective third molar surgery were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each: Group A received propofol along with local anaesthesia; Group B received midazolam along with local anaesthesia and Group C received local anaesthesia alone. After the local anaesthesia, with or without sedative agents, the impacted third molars were removed in Operation Theater. Results: Group A clearly showed advantages over Group B & C on all the parameters that we have selected. Conclusion: Even though the cost of propofol is high, suitable operating conditions, faster onset of sedation, rapid recovery, and minimal side effects support the use of this drug for conscious sedation for third molar surgery. https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5332/11043_CE(Ra)_F(Sh)_PF1(SNAK)_PFA(AK).pdfdental surgeryimpacted third molarlocal anaesthesiamidazolampropofol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jigar M Dhuvad
Rajesh A Kshisagar
Mukesh M Dhuvad
spellingShingle Jigar M Dhuvad
Rajesh A Kshisagar
Mukesh M Dhuvad
Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
dental surgery
impacted third molar
local anaesthesia
midazolam
propofol
author_facet Jigar M Dhuvad
Rajesh A Kshisagar
Mukesh M Dhuvad
author_sort Jigar M Dhuvad
title Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Vital Parameters During Third Molar Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia with and without Sedative Agents
title_sort comparative evaluation of vital parameters during third molar surgery under local anaesthesia with and without sedative agents
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Aims: To compare vital parameters; operator’s comfort; and patient’s satisfaction during impacted third molar removal under local anaesthesia, with or without sedative agents. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients undergoing elective third molar surgery were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each: Group A received propofol along with local anaesthesia; Group B received midazolam along with local anaesthesia and Group C received local anaesthesia alone. After the local anaesthesia, with or without sedative agents, the impacted third molars were removed in Operation Theater. Results: Group A clearly showed advantages over Group B & C on all the parameters that we have selected. Conclusion: Even though the cost of propofol is high, suitable operating conditions, faster onset of sedation, rapid recovery, and minimal side effects support the use of this drug for conscious sedation for third molar surgery.
topic dental surgery
impacted third molar
local anaesthesia
midazolam
propofol
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5332/11043_CE(Ra)_F(Sh)_PF1(SNAK)_PFA(AK).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jigarmdhuvad comparativeevaluationofvitalparametersduringthirdmolarsurgeryunderlocalanaesthesiawithandwithoutsedativeagents
AT rajeshakshisagar comparativeevaluationofvitalparametersduringthirdmolarsurgeryunderlocalanaesthesiawithandwithoutsedativeagents
AT mukeshmdhuvad comparativeevaluationofvitalparametersduringthirdmolarsurgeryunderlocalanaesthesiawithandwithoutsedativeagents
_version_ 1724524965099732992