The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate

In order to prevent solids from forming during the transportation and handling of liquid propane, C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>(<i>l</i>), the fluid is dehydrated to a level below the water dew point concentration for the coldest operating temperature. Thus, accurate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kayode I. Adeniyi, Connor E. Deering, Robert A. Marriott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6295
id doaj-0495f8b782874e7ca491ac3b335a7ea0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0495f8b782874e7ca491ac3b335a7ea02020-11-30T00:00:44ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-11-01136295629510.3390/en13236295The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII HydrateKayode I. Adeniyi0Connor E. Deering1Robert A. Marriott2Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaIn order to prevent solids from forming during the transportation and handling of liquid propane, C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>(<i>l</i>), the fluid is dehydrated to a level below the water dew point concentration for the coldest operating temperature. Thus, accurate calculation of the saturation water content for C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub> is important to determine the designed allowable concentration in liquid C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>. In this work, we measured the water content of liquid C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub> in the presence of the structure II hydrate from <i>p</i> = 1.081 to 40.064 MPa and <i>T</i> = 241.95 to 276.11 K using a tunable diode absorption spectroscopy technique. The water content results were modelled using the reference quality reduced Helmholtz equations and the Sloan et al. model for the non-hydrate and hydrate phases, respectively. Calculations show a good agreement (an average difference of less than 12 ppm) when compared to our measurements. Furthermore, the model was also used for calculating the dissociation temperatures for three phase loci, where a relative difference greater than 5 K was observed compared to the literature, hence our previously model reported by Adeniyi et al. is recommended for three phase loci calculations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6295propanestructure type II hydratewater contentflow assurance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kayode I. Adeniyi
Connor E. Deering
Robert A. Marriott
spellingShingle Kayode I. Adeniyi
Connor E. Deering
Robert A. Marriott
The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
Energies
propane
structure type II hydrate
water content
flow assurance
author_facet Kayode I. Adeniyi
Connor E. Deering
Robert A. Marriott
author_sort Kayode I. Adeniyi
title The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
title_short The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
title_full The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
title_fullStr The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
title_full_unstemmed The Saturated Water Content of Liquid Propane in Equilibrium with the sII Hydrate
title_sort saturated water content of liquid propane in equilibrium with the sii hydrate
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-11-01
description In order to prevent solids from forming during the transportation and handling of liquid propane, C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>(<i>l</i>), the fluid is dehydrated to a level below the water dew point concentration for the coldest operating temperature. Thus, accurate calculation of the saturation water content for C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub> is important to determine the designed allowable concentration in liquid C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>. In this work, we measured the water content of liquid C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub> in the presence of the structure II hydrate from <i>p</i> = 1.081 to 40.064 MPa and <i>T</i> = 241.95 to 276.11 K using a tunable diode absorption spectroscopy technique. The water content results were modelled using the reference quality reduced Helmholtz equations and the Sloan et al. model for the non-hydrate and hydrate phases, respectively. Calculations show a good agreement (an average difference of less than 12 ppm) when compared to our measurements. Furthermore, the model was also used for calculating the dissociation temperatures for three phase loci, where a relative difference greater than 5 K was observed compared to the literature, hence our previously model reported by Adeniyi et al. is recommended for three phase loci calculations.
topic propane
structure type II hydrate
water content
flow assurance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6295
work_keys_str_mv AT kayodeiadeniyi thesaturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
AT connoredeering thesaturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
AT robertamarriott thesaturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
AT kayodeiadeniyi saturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
AT connoredeering saturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
AT robertamarriott saturatedwatercontentofliquidpropaneinequilibriumwiththesiihydrate
_version_ 1724411726082867200