Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state

With the rising of modern data science, data-driven turbulence modeling with the aid of machine learning algorithms is becoming a new promising field. Many approaches are able to achieve better Reynolds stress prediction, with much lower modeling error (ϵM), than traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xianwen Guo, Zhenhua Xia, Shiyi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095034921000519
id doaj-04945827d42a4ebdbc8908db0a036881
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04945827d42a4ebdbc8908db0a0368812021-07-17T04:33:23ZengElsevierTheoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters2095-03492021-03-01113100244Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady stateXianwen Guo0Zhenhua Xia1Shiyi Chen2State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; Corresponding author.Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaWith the rising of modern data science, data-driven turbulence modeling with the aid of machine learning algorithms is becoming a new promising field. Many approaches are able to achieve better Reynolds stress prediction, with much lower modeling error (ϵM), than traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, but they still suffer from numerical error and stability issues when the mean velocity fields are estimated by solving RANS equations with the predicted Reynolds stresses. This fact illustrates that the error of solving the RANS equations (ϵP) is also very important for a RANS simulation. In the present work, the error ϵP is studied separately by using the Reynolds stresses obtained from direct numerical simulation (DNS)/highly resolved large-eddy simulation to minimize the modeling error ϵM, and the sources of ϵP are derived mathematically. For the implementations with known Reynolds stresses solely, we suggest to run an auxiliary RANS simulation to make a first guess on νt* and Sij0. With around 10 iterations, the error of the streamwise velocity component could be reduced by about one-order of magnitude in flow over periodic hills. The present work is not to develop a new RANS model, but to clarify the facts that obtaining mean field with known Reynolds stresses is nontrivial and that the nonlinear part of the Reynolds stresses is very important in flow problems with separations. The proposed approach to reduce ϵP may be very useful for the a posteriori applications of the data-driven turbulence models.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095034921000519RANSPropagation errorNonlinear Reynolds stresses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xianwen Guo
Zhenhua Xia
Shiyi Chen
spellingShingle Xianwen Guo
Zhenhua Xia
Shiyi Chen
Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters
RANS
Propagation error
Nonlinear Reynolds stresses
author_facet Xianwen Guo
Zhenhua Xia
Shiyi Chen
author_sort Xianwen Guo
title Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
title_short Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
title_full Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
title_fullStr Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
title_full_unstemmed Computing mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state
title_sort computing mean fields with known reynolds stresses at steady state
publisher Elsevier
series Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters
issn 2095-0349
publishDate 2021-03-01
description With the rising of modern data science, data-driven turbulence modeling with the aid of machine learning algorithms is becoming a new promising field. Many approaches are able to achieve better Reynolds stress prediction, with much lower modeling error (ϵM), than traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, but they still suffer from numerical error and stability issues when the mean velocity fields are estimated by solving RANS equations with the predicted Reynolds stresses. This fact illustrates that the error of solving the RANS equations (ϵP) is also very important for a RANS simulation. In the present work, the error ϵP is studied separately by using the Reynolds stresses obtained from direct numerical simulation (DNS)/highly resolved large-eddy simulation to minimize the modeling error ϵM, and the sources of ϵP are derived mathematically. For the implementations with known Reynolds stresses solely, we suggest to run an auxiliary RANS simulation to make a first guess on νt* and Sij0. With around 10 iterations, the error of the streamwise velocity component could be reduced by about one-order of magnitude in flow over periodic hills. The present work is not to develop a new RANS model, but to clarify the facts that obtaining mean field with known Reynolds stresses is nontrivial and that the nonlinear part of the Reynolds stresses is very important in flow problems with separations. The proposed approach to reduce ϵP may be very useful for the a posteriori applications of the data-driven turbulence models.
topic RANS
Propagation error
Nonlinear Reynolds stresses
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095034921000519
work_keys_str_mv AT xianwenguo computingmeanfieldswithknownreynoldsstressesatsteadystate
AT zhenhuaxia computingmeanfieldswithknownreynoldsstressesatsteadystate
AT shiyichen computingmeanfieldswithknownreynoldsstressesatsteadystate
_version_ 1721296943279243264