The Novel New Jersey Eyewitness Instruction Induces Skepticism but Not Sensitivity.
In recent decades, social scientists have shown that the reliability of eyewitness identifications is much worse than laypersons tend to believe. Although courts have only recently begun to react to this evidence, the New Jersey judiciary has reformed its jury instructions to notify jurors about the...
Main Authors: | Athan P Papailiou, David V Yokum, Christopher T Robertson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4674112?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
by: Annelies Vredeveldt, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
The Skepticism of Skeptical Theism
by: Edward Wierenga
Published: (2019-09-01) -
COVID-19 Skepticism in Relation to Other Forms of Science Skepticism
by: Christopher P. Scheitle, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Eyewitnesses of History
by: Simoni, Paolo
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Rereading «Eyewitness»
by: Charidijr Valihanov
Published: (2013-01-01)