Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken

The U.S. Endangered Species Act is often criticized as "pitting people against wildlife" by conserving habitat at the cost of jobs, but relatively little is known about the labor market effects of listing a species under the Endangered Species Act. We examine changes in employment associat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard T. Melstrom, Kangil Lee, Jacob P. Byl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276499
id doaj-0476cfbcf7e84e028c262da71fb0166d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0476cfbcf7e84e028c262da71fb0166d2020-11-25T02:12:10ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852018-09-0143334636310.22004/ag.econ.276499276499Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie ChickenRichard T. MelstromKangil LeeJacob P. BylThe U.S. Endangered Species Act is often criticized as "pitting people against wildlife" by conserving habitat at the cost of jobs, but relatively little is known about the labor market effects of listing a species under the Endangered Species Act. We examine changes in employment associated with the lesser prairie chicken, which was listed as threatened in May 2014. Using county-level employment data and variation in suitable prairie chicken habitat, we apply a difference-in-differences strategy to measure the employment effects of the listing decision. We find evidence that employment declined about 1.5% in affected counties. The effect is proportional to habitat, which means counties with relatively more habitat experienced a larger share of employment losses.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276499conservationendangered species act of 1973growthhabitat
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard T. Melstrom
Kangil Lee
Jacob P. Byl
spellingShingle Richard T. Melstrom
Kangil Lee
Jacob P. Byl
Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
conservation
endangered species act of 1973
growth
habitat
author_facet Richard T. Melstrom
Kangil Lee
Jacob P. Byl
author_sort Richard T. Melstrom
title Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
title_short Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
title_full Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
title_fullStr Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
title_full_unstemmed Do Regulations to Protect Endangered Species on Private Lands Affect Local Employment? Evidence from the Listing of the Lesser Prairie Chicken
title_sort do regulations to protect endangered species on private lands affect local employment? evidence from the listing of the lesser prairie chicken
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The U.S. Endangered Species Act is often criticized as "pitting people against wildlife" by conserving habitat at the cost of jobs, but relatively little is known about the labor market effects of listing a species under the Endangered Species Act. We examine changes in employment associated with the lesser prairie chicken, which was listed as threatened in May 2014. Using county-level employment data and variation in suitable prairie chicken habitat, we apply a difference-in-differences strategy to measure the employment effects of the listing decision. We find evidence that employment declined about 1.5% in affected counties. The effect is proportional to habitat, which means counties with relatively more habitat experienced a larger share of employment losses.
topic conservation
endangered species act of 1973
growth
habitat
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276499
work_keys_str_mv AT richardtmelstrom doregulationstoprotectendangeredspeciesonprivatelandsaffectlocalemploymentevidencefromthelistingofthelesserprairiechicken
AT kangillee doregulationstoprotectendangeredspeciesonprivatelandsaffectlocalemploymentevidencefromthelistingofthelesserprairiechicken
AT jacobpbyl doregulationstoprotectendangeredspeciesonprivatelandsaffectlocalemploymentevidencefromthelistingofthelesserprairiechicken
_version_ 1724911125331443712