Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia

The aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., St...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabel Introzzi, Lorena Canet-Juric, Silvana Montes, Soledad López, Graziella Mascarello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de San Buenaventura 2015-07-01
Series:International Journal of Psychological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300
id doaj-0471a457aa664cd7805ed67957cb9632
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0471a457aa664cd7805ed67957cb96322020-11-24T22:34:36ZengUniversidad de San BuenaventuraInternational Journal of Psychological Research2011-20842011-79222015-07-01826074 Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertiaIsabel Introzzi0Lorena Canet-Juric1Silvana Montes2Soledad López3Graziella Mascarello4Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETThe aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., Stop signal, visual search, Stemberg´s experimental and Simon paradigm) were adapted and included in a computerized program called TAC (Introzzi & Canet Juric, 2014) to the assessment of the different cognitive processes. The final sample consisted of 45 adults (18-50 years). Perceptual and behavioral inhibition shows moderate and low correlations with attentional cost, cognitive inhibition shows no relation with flexibility and only perceptual inhibition predicts switching costs effects, suggesting that different inhibitory processes contribute differentially to switch cost. This could be interpreted as evidence to Attentional Inertia Theory main argument which postulates that inhibition plays an essential role in the ability to flexibly switch between tasks and/or representations.http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300Inhibitory processcognitive flexibilityAttentional Inertia Theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
spellingShingle Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
International Journal of Psychological Research
Inhibitory process
cognitive flexibility
Attentional Inertia Theory
author_facet Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
author_sort Isabel Introzzi
title Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_short Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_full Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_fullStr Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_sort inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
publisher Universidad de San Buenaventura
series International Journal of Psychological Research
issn 2011-2084
2011-7922
publishDate 2015-07-01
description The aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., Stop signal, visual search, Stemberg´s experimental and Simon paradigm) were adapted and included in a computerized program called TAC (Introzzi & Canet Juric, 2014) to the assessment of the different cognitive processes. The final sample consisted of 45 adults (18-50 years). Perceptual and behavioral inhibition shows moderate and low correlations with attentional cost, cognitive inhibition shows no relation with flexibility and only perceptual inhibition predicts switching costs effects, suggesting that different inhibitory processes contribute differentially to switch cost. This could be interpreted as evidence to Attentional Inertia Theory main argument which postulates that inhibition plays an essential role in the ability to flexibly switch between tasks and/or representations.
topic Inhibitory process
cognitive flexibility
Attentional Inertia Theory
url http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelintrozzi inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT lorenacanetjuric inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT silvanamontes inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT soledadlopez inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT graziellamascarello inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
_version_ 1725726487081910272