A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images

Abstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivan Arismendi, Gwen Bury, Lauren Zatkos, Jeff Snyder, David Lindley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444
id doaj-046ae21859114a3d9695e52ab32ad3a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-046ae21859114a3d9695e52ab32ad3a62021-05-19T04:56:22ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-05-0111105497550210.1002/ece3.7444A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital imagesIvan Arismendi0Gwen Bury1Lauren Zatkos2Jeff Snyder3David Lindley4Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis USAOak Ridge Institute for Science and Technology Fellowship hosted by USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Corvallis USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis USADepartment of Biology Western Oregon University Monmouth USAL.N. Curtis & Sons Walnut Creek USAAbstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body lengths of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and larval coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). Images were postprocessed using ImageJ2. We measured more than 900 individuals of these two species from 200 pool habitats along 9.6 river kilometers. The percent error (mean ± SE) of our approach compared to the use of a traditional graded measuring board was relatively small for all length metrics of the two species. Total length of trout was −2.2% ± 1.0. Snout–vent length and total length of larval salamanders was 3.5% ± 3.3 and −0.6% ± 1.7, respectively. We cross‐validated our results by two independent observers that followed our protocol to measure the same animals and found no significant differences (p > .7) in body size distributions for all length metrics of the two species. Our procedure provides reliable information of body size reducing stress and handling time in the field. The method is transferable across taxa and the inclusion of multiple animals per image increases sampling efficiency with stored images that can be reviewed multiple times. This practical tool can improve data collection of animal size over large sampling efforts and broad spatiotemporal contexts.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444experimental forestLong‐term Ecological Researchsalamanderstream networksynoptic samplingtrout
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivan Arismendi
Gwen Bury
Lauren Zatkos
Jeff Snyder
David Lindley
spellingShingle Ivan Arismendi
Gwen Bury
Lauren Zatkos
Jeff Snyder
David Lindley
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
Ecology and Evolution
experimental forest
Long‐term Ecological Research
salamander
stream network
synoptic sampling
trout
author_facet Ivan Arismendi
Gwen Bury
Lauren Zatkos
Jeff Snyder
David Lindley
author_sort Ivan Arismendi
title A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
title_short A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
title_full A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
title_fullStr A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
title_full_unstemmed A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
title_sort method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body lengths of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and larval coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). Images were postprocessed using ImageJ2. We measured more than 900 individuals of these two species from 200 pool habitats along 9.6 river kilometers. The percent error (mean ± SE) of our approach compared to the use of a traditional graded measuring board was relatively small for all length metrics of the two species. Total length of trout was −2.2% ± 1.0. Snout–vent length and total length of larval salamanders was 3.5% ± 3.3 and −0.6% ± 1.7, respectively. We cross‐validated our results by two independent observers that followed our protocol to measure the same animals and found no significant differences (p > .7) in body size distributions for all length metrics of the two species. Our procedure provides reliable information of body size reducing stress and handling time in the field. The method is transferable across taxa and the inclusion of multiple animals per image increases sampling efficiency with stored images that can be reviewed multiple times. This practical tool can improve data collection of animal size over large sampling efforts and broad spatiotemporal contexts.
topic experimental forest
Long‐term Ecological Research
salamander
stream network
synoptic sampling
trout
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanarismendi amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT gwenbury amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT laurenzatkos amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT jeffsnyder amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT davidlindley amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT ivanarismendi methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT gwenbury methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT laurenzatkos methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT jeffsnyder methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
AT davidlindley methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages
_version_ 1721436989531619328