A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images
Abstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444 |
id |
doaj-046ae21859114a3d9695e52ab32ad3a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-046ae21859114a3d9695e52ab32ad3a62021-05-19T04:56:22ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-05-0111105497550210.1002/ece3.7444A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital imagesIvan Arismendi0Gwen Bury1Lauren Zatkos2Jeff Snyder3David Lindley4Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis USAOak Ridge Institute for Science and Technology Fellowship hosted by USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Corvallis USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis USADepartment of Biology Western Oregon University Monmouth USAL.N. Curtis & Sons Walnut Creek USAAbstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body lengths of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and larval coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). Images were postprocessed using ImageJ2. We measured more than 900 individuals of these two species from 200 pool habitats along 9.6 river kilometers. The percent error (mean ± SE) of our approach compared to the use of a traditional graded measuring board was relatively small for all length metrics of the two species. Total length of trout was −2.2% ± 1.0. Snout–vent length and total length of larval salamanders was 3.5% ± 3.3 and −0.6% ± 1.7, respectively. We cross‐validated our results by two independent observers that followed our protocol to measure the same animals and found no significant differences (p > .7) in body size distributions for all length metrics of the two species. Our procedure provides reliable information of body size reducing stress and handling time in the field. The method is transferable across taxa and the inclusion of multiple animals per image increases sampling efficiency with stored images that can be reviewed multiple times. This practical tool can improve data collection of animal size over large sampling efforts and broad spatiotemporal contexts.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444experimental forestLong‐term Ecological Researchsalamanderstream networksynoptic samplingtrout |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ivan Arismendi Gwen Bury Lauren Zatkos Jeff Snyder David Lindley |
spellingShingle |
Ivan Arismendi Gwen Bury Lauren Zatkos Jeff Snyder David Lindley A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images Ecology and Evolution experimental forest Long‐term Ecological Research salamander stream network synoptic sampling trout |
author_facet |
Ivan Arismendi Gwen Bury Lauren Zatkos Jeff Snyder David Lindley |
author_sort |
Ivan Arismendi |
title |
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
title_short |
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
title_full |
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
title_fullStr |
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
title_full_unstemmed |
A method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
title_sort |
method to evaluate body length of live aquatic vertebrates using digital images |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2045-7758 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Traditional methods to measure body lengths of aquatic vertebrates rely on anesthetics, and extended handling times. These procedures can increase stress, potentially affecting the animal's welfare after its release. We developed a simple procedure using digital images to estimate body lengths of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and larval coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). Images were postprocessed using ImageJ2. We measured more than 900 individuals of these two species from 200 pool habitats along 9.6 river kilometers. The percent error (mean ± SE) of our approach compared to the use of a traditional graded measuring board was relatively small for all length metrics of the two species. Total length of trout was −2.2% ± 1.0. Snout–vent length and total length of larval salamanders was 3.5% ± 3.3 and −0.6% ± 1.7, respectively. We cross‐validated our results by two independent observers that followed our protocol to measure the same animals and found no significant differences (p > .7) in body size distributions for all length metrics of the two species. Our procedure provides reliable information of body size reducing stress and handling time in the field. The method is transferable across taxa and the inclusion of multiple animals per image increases sampling efficiency with stored images that can be reviewed multiple times. This practical tool can improve data collection of animal size over large sampling efforts and broad spatiotemporal contexts. |
topic |
experimental forest Long‐term Ecological Research salamander stream network synoptic sampling trout |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7444 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ivanarismendi amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT gwenbury amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT laurenzatkos amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT jeffsnyder amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT davidlindley amethodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT ivanarismendi methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT gwenbury methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT laurenzatkos methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT jeffsnyder methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages AT davidlindley methodtoevaluatebodylengthofliveaquaticvertebratesusingdigitalimages |
_version_ |
1721436989531619328 |